"

Chapter 7: Thriving Under Pressure: Workplace Stress and Emotional Dynamics

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

  1. Describe the stress cycle and explain how physiological, psychological, and behavioral responses to stress unfold over time.
  2. Identify common workplace stressors, including organizational, interpersonal, and environmental sources—and recognize how they differ across roles and cultures.
  3. Analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of stress, including impacts on health, performance, attitudes, and organizational effectiveness.
  4. Evaluate strategies for managing stress within organizational contexts, including wellness programs, supportive communication, role clarity, and workload design.
  5. Explain the influence of emotions on workplace attitudes, decision-making, teamwork, and leadership communication.
  6. Define emotional labor and explore techniques to manage it effectively in service-oriented and high-interaction roles.
  7. Assess how emotions shape ethical perceptions and behaviors, and how emotional awareness can support ethical decision-making.
  8. Compare cross-cultural differences in stress experiences, coping strategies, and emotional norms across global workplaces.

Section 7.1: Spotlight

Organizational Stress and Emotional Mismanagement in the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

 

Discussion Questions

  1. How does the stress cycle manifest in high-pressure workplaces, and what are the long-term outcomes for both individuals and organizations when stress is not effectively managed? Can you think of examples where unmanaged stress led to a breakdown in performance or morale?
  2. What are some common sources of stress in organizations, and how do these stressors differ across roles or cultural contexts? How might these stressors lead to outcomes such as burnout, absenteeism, or ethical lapses?
  3. How do emotions and attitudes influence workplace behavior and decision-making, particularly in high-stress environments? In what ways can negative emotions, such as frustration or fear, impact perceptions of fairness or ethical behavior?
  4. How does emotional labor—such as suppressing personal feelings to display organizationally appropriate emotions—affect employees’ well-being and ethical decision-making? Can you think of situations where emotional labor might lead to ethical dilemmas or conflicts?
  5. How do cross-cultural differences in stressors and coping mechanisms complicate workplace dynamics? What strategies can organizations use to address these differences and create a more inclusive and supportive environment for all employees?

Section 7.2: What Is Stress?

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

  • Explain the General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) and its application to organizational stress, including how the alarm, resistance, and exhaustion phases manifest in workplace settings.
  • Identify and classify major workplace stressors, such as role demands, digital communication overload, work–family conflict, cultural misalignment, and ambiguous communication norms.
  • Analyze the multidimensional impact of stress, including psychological, physiological, and performance-related outcomes, with attention to emotional regulation and organizational dynamics.
  • Explore individual differences in stress response, including personality traits, cultural background, gender, and communication style—and their influence on coping strategies and workplace behavior.

Stress—a term borrowed from the physical sciences—originally described the force exerted on an object. In human terms, it refers to the external and internal pressures that challenge our ability to adapt. Psychiatrist Peter Panzarino (2008) described stress as “forces from the outside world affecting the individual,” a definition that still resonates in today’s fast-paced, hyperconnected work environments.

Psychologists define stress as the body’s response to any demand that requires physical, mental, or emotional adjustment (Dyer, 2006). But in organizational contexts, stress is more than a biological reaction—it’s a communicative experience shaped by how individuals interpret, express, and manage pressure within social systems (Kaiser, 2018; Lee, 2025).

Stress can be energizing—the push that gets us out of bed, fuels ambition, and drives performance. But when unmanaged or miscommunicated, it becomes destructive, leading to burnout, disengagement, and ethical lapses (Sapolsky, 2017; Sutton, 2025).

Recent data underscores the urgency:

  • Over 80% of American workers report feeling workplace stress at least some of the time (Pew Research Center, 2023).
  • 63% of workers say stress has led them to quit jobs, citing sleep disruption and negative thought patterns (American Psychological Association, 2022).
  • In the UK, nearly 400,000 new cases of work-related stress, anxiety, and depression were reported in 2021–2022, resulting in 17 million lost workdays (Clarke, 2022).

Organizational communication scholars argue that stress is not just a reaction—it’s a relational signal. It reflects how employees experience role clarity, feedback, psychological safety, and emotional labor in their daily interactions (Deetz, 1992; Jablin, 1987). When stress is openly acknowledged and constructively addressed, it becomes a resource for growth rather than a liability.

This chapter explores how stress unfolds in organizational life, how emotions shape behavior and ethics, and how communication can be used to recognize, regulate, and reframe stress for healthier outcomes.

Understanding the Stress Cycle: From Triggers to Coping

Stress is not just a biological reflex—it’s a communicative and relational experience shaped by how individuals interpret, express, and manage pressure within organizational contexts (Kaiser, 2018; Lee, 2025). While the physiological roots of stress are well-established, modern research emphasizes the role of emotional regulation, organizational messaging, and psychological safety in shaping how stress unfolds and is resolved.

The Brain’s Response to Stress

Our autonomic nervous system governs unconscious functions like breathing, digestion, and heartbeat. When a threat is perceived—whether physical danger or a looming deadline—the amygdala, part of the limbic system, triggers the fight-or-flight response (Cannon, 1915). This reaction floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol, increasing heart rate, sharpening focus, and suppressing non-essential functions like digestion.

Importantly, the amygdala doesn’t differentiate between physical threats and social or psychological stressors. A tense meeting or performance review can activate the same biological response as escaping danger, which is why workplace stress can feel so visceral.

General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)

Hans Selye’s General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS) remains a foundational model for understanding how stress progresses through three stages (Selye, 1956; Selye, 1976):

Figure 7.2

Resistance to stress has three stages: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion

In Selye’s GAS model, stress affects an individual in three steps: alarm, resistance, and exhaustion.

In the alarm phase of stress, an outside stressor jolts the individual, insisting that something must be done. It may help to think of this as the fight-or-flight moment in the individual’s experience. If the response is sufficient, the body will return to its resting state after having successfully dealt with the source of stress.

In the resistance phase, the body begins to release cortisol and draws on reserves of fats and sugars to find a way to adjust to the demands of stress. This reaction works well for short periods of time, but it is only a temporary fix. Individuals forced to endure the stress of cold and hunger may find a way to adjust to lower temperatures and less food. While it is possible for the body to “adapt” to such stresses, the situation cannot continue. The body is drawing on its reserves, like a hospital using backup generators after a power failure. It can continue to function by shutting down unnecessary items like large overhead lights, elevators, televisions, and most computers, but it cannot proceed in that state forever.

In the exhaustion phase, the body has depleted its stores of sugars and fats, and the prolonged release of cortisol has caused the stressor to significantly weaken the individual. Disease results from the body’s weakened state, leading to death in the most extreme cases. This eventual depletion is why we’re more likely to reach for foods rich in fat or sugar, caffeine, or other quick fixes that give us energy when we are stressed. Selye referred to stress that led to disease as distress and stress that was enjoyable or healing as eustress.

Stress as a Communicative Experience

Organizational communication scholars argue that stress is shaped by how it’s talked about, managed, and supported in the workplace. Stress becomes more manageable when:

  • Employees receive clear feedback and role clarity
  • Leaders foster psychological safety and open dialogue
  • Teams engage in collaborative problem-solving rather than isolation

When stress is ignored or stigmatized, it escalates. But when it’s acknowledged and addressed through supportive communication, it can become a catalyst for growth and resilience (Deetz, 1992; Jablin, 1987; Sutton, 2025).

Ten Sources of Stress in Organizational Life

Stressors are events, interactions, or environmental conditions that trigger a physiological or psychological stress response. While stressors are often viewed negatively, they are not inherently harmful. In fact, moderate stress can enhance focus, motivation, and performance—what psychologists call eustress (Selye, 1976). However, when stressors accumulate without adequate recovery or support, they can lead to distress, burnout, and disengagement.

Organizational communication scholars emphasize that stress is shaped not only by external pressures but also by how those pressures are interpreted, discussed, and managed within the workplace (Kaiser, 2018; Sutton, 2025). For example, unclear expectations, poor feedback loops, and lack of psychological safety can amplify the impact of otherwise manageable stressors.

Recent data highlights the widespread nature of workplace stress:

  • The American Psychological Association (2022) reports that top stressors for U.S. adults include money, work, family responsibilities, and housing—all of which are deeply intertwined with employment and organizational life.
  • Workplace dynamics, such as team conflict, lack of autonomy, and poor communication, are increasingly cited as root causes of chronic stress (Lee, 2025; Psychology Today, 2025).

Stress is cumulative. A single stressor may be manageable, but repeated exposure to multiple stressors—especially without adequate support—can lead to emotional exhaustion, cognitive overload, and relational strain. This is why understanding the sources of stress in organizational contexts is essential for designing healthier, more resilient work environments.

One major category of workplace stressors is role demands—the expectations, responsibilities, and pressures associated with a specific job or position. But stress also arises from information overload, work–family conflict, life transitions, and organizational change. Each of these will be explored in the sections that follow.

1. Role Demands

Role demands refer to the expectations, responsibilities, and pressures associated with a person’s position in an organization. When these demands are unclear, contradictory, or excessive, they become powerful stressors that can undermine performance, motivation, and well-being (Quick et al., 1997; Eatough et al., 2011).

Organizational communication scholars emphasize that role stress is not just about workload—it’s about how roles are defined, communicated, and supported. Employees thrive when they understand what’s expected of them, feel empowered to meet those expectations, and receive consistent feedback. When these elements are missing, stress escalates.

Types of Role Stress

Type of Role Stress Description Common Outcomes
Role Ambiguity Unclear expectations, vague responsibilities, or lack of feedback Emotional exhaustion, low job satisfaction, turnover intentions
Role Conflict Contradictory demands from different stakeholders or tasks Frustration, ethical strain, reduced performance
Role Overload Too many responsibilities or insufficient time/resources Burnout, absenteeism, decreased creativity

Role Ambiguity

Role ambiguity occurs when employees are unsure about what their responsibilities are, how success is measured, or what behaviors are expected. This is especially common during onboarding, organizational change, or in poorly structured teams. High role ambiguity is linked to:

  • Lower job satisfaction and performance
  • Higher emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions
  • Difficulty adjusting to new roles or cultures (Bauer et al., 2007; Gilboa et al., 2008; AJHSSR, 2020)

Role Conflict

Role conflict arises when employees face incompatible demands—such as being asked to cut costs while improving customer satisfaction. It can also occur when personal values clash with organizational expectations (e.g., being asked to promote a product one doesn’t believe in). Role conflict is associated with:

  • Increased stress and burnout
  • Reduced organizational commitment
  • Lower team cohesion and trust (Beamible, 2025; Lee et al., 2019; Schmidt et al., 2014)

Role Overload

Role overload happens when employees are expected to do more than they can reasonably handle, either in terms of time or complexity. This often occurs after downsizing, during rapid growth, or in understaffed teams. Role overload contributes to:

  • Physical and psychological strain
  • Declines in performance and innovation
  • Higher absenteeism and turnover (Tang & Vandenberghe, 2021; Widmer, 1993; Eatough et al., 2011)

Interestingly, some employees may respond to overload by increasing their effort—especially if they view it as a challenge rather than a threat (Frontiers in Psychology, 2021). However, sustained overload without support leads to resource depletion and long-term harm.

2. Information Overload: Navigating the Digital Deluge

Information overload occurs when the volume, frequency, or complexity of incoming messages exceeds an individual’s ability to process them effectively. In today’s hyperconnected workplace, employees are bombarded by emails, chats, notifications, reports, and meetings—often across multiple platforms. This constant stream of input can lead to cognitive fatigue, decision paralysis, and emotional exhaustion (Bawden & Robinson, 2020; LumApps, 2025). Originally defined by Schick, Gordon, & Haka (1990) as a mismatch between information demands and processing capacity, information overload now includes:

  • Digital communication overload: Excessive emails, Slack messages, and app notifications
  • Technostress: Stress caused by the use of digital tools and platforms (Marsh et al., 2024)
  • FoMO (Fear of Missing Out): Anxiety from not keeping up with updates or conversations (Barry, 2024)

A 2022 OpenText survey found that 80% of workers reported information overload as a source of daily stress, with frequent interruptions and email addiction contributing to burnout (YAROOMS, 2022).

Organizational communication scholars emphasize that information overload is not just a technical issue—it’s a relational and structural challenge. It reflects how communication is designed, filtered, and prioritized within the workplace (Deetz, 1992; Jablin, 1987). Poorly managed communication systems can:

  • Undermine employee engagement and trust
  • Reduce decision-making quality
  • Fragment team cohesion and collaboration

When employees are overwhelmed, they may disengage, ignore messages, or avoid communication altogether—leading to information avoidance and communication breakdowns (Speakap, 2025; LumApps, 2025).

Strategies for Managing Overload

To reduce information overload, organizations can:

  • Streamline communication channels and eliminate redundancy (YAROOMS, 2022)
  • Promote asynchronous communication and “right to disconnect” policies (Woxday, 2025)
  • Use AI filters and automation to prioritize relevant messages (Barry, 2024)
  • Encourage digital detox windows and focus time blocks (Together Platform, 2023)
  • Train employees in information literacy and boundary-setting

Effective internal communication is not about sending more—it’s about sending better.

3. Work–Family Conflict: Navigating the Spillover Between Roles

Work–family conflict is a form of interrole tension that arises when the demands of work and family are mutually incompatible, such that participation in one domain makes it difficult to fulfill responsibilities in the other (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985; Netemeyer, Boles, & McMurrian, 1996). This conflict can flow in two directions:

  • Work interfering with family (WIF): e.g., long hours or emotional strain from work affecting home life
  • Family interfering with work (FIW): e.g., caregiving responsibilities disrupting work schedules

In today’s digital-first workplace, this conflict has intensified. The rise of remote work, constant connectivity, and dual-earner households have blurred boundaries between professional and personal life (APA, 2023; LumApps, 2025). A recent ADPI Research Institute survey found that average weekly work hours in North America more than doubled from 4 to 8.9 hours of overtime between 2020 and 2021 (Richardson & Klein, 2021), contributing to a spillover effect that heightens stress across domains. Stress in one domain often amplifies stress in another. For example:

  • A demanding job may reduce time and energy for family responsibilities
  • Family stressors (e.g., illness, childcare) may impair focus and productivity at work

This cumulative stress can lead to:

  • Lower job and life satisfaction
  • Burnout and emotional exhaustion
  • Reduced organizational commitment and performance (Allen et al., 2000; Ford, Heinen, & Langkamer, 2007; Frone et al., 1992; Hammer et al., 2003)

Interestingly, research shows that women experience slightly higher levels of work–family conflict than men, likely due to persistent gender norms around caregiving and emotional labor (Kossek & Ozeki, 1998; Shockley et al., 2017).

Organizational Strategies for Work–Life Balance

Organizations that support work–life balance are perceived as more attractive and ethical employers (Barnett & Hall, 2001; Greenhaus & Powell, 2006). Effective strategies include:

  • Flexible scheduling and remote work options
  • Supervisor support for family and personal life (Kelly et al., 2014)
  • Family-supportive organizational cultures, including childcare resources and paid leave policies (Allen et al., 2013)

Communication scholars emphasize that supportive messaging, empathetic leadership, and clear boundaries are essential for reducing work–family conflict and promoting employee well-being (Deetz, 1992; Jablin, 1987).

4. Life Changes and Downsizing: Navigating Stressful Transitions

Major life changes—whether joyful or painful—can significantly disrupt an individual’s emotional, cognitive, and behavioral equilibrium. Events such as marriage, relocation, caregiving, or job loss often require rapid adaptation, and when multiple transitions occur in close succession, the cumulative stress can lead to burnout, emotional exhaustion, and health deterioration (APA, 2024; Workplace Strategies for Mental Health, 2024).

The Holmes-Rahe Life Stress Inventory remains a foundational tool for assessing the impact of life events. For example:

  • Death of a spouse: 100 (highest stress)
  • Marriage: 50
  • Job loss: 47 (Fontana, 1989)

These scores reflect the relative strain each event places on the body and mind. Importantly, stressors are cumulative—meaning that multiple life changes in a short period can compound vulnerability to illness and psychological strain (Inc., 2018).

Among life changes, downsizing is one of the most disruptive in organizational contexts. It affects not only those who lose their jobs but also those who remain—often referred to as “survivors”—who may experience guilt, anxiety, and increased workload (APA, 2025; Lipman, 2024).

Recent studies show:

  • Downsizing leads to elevated stress, anxiety, and low self-esteem, especially when layoffs are abrupt or poorly communicated (Kelly, 2023).
  • Remaining employees often report lower morale, trust, and job satisfaction, along with survivor guilt and fear of future layoffs (SHRM, 2024; Nectar, 2025).
  • Chronic job insecurity is linked to burnout, mental health decline, and reduced productivity (Hammer et al., 2024; López Bohle et al., 2016).

Organizational communication scholars emphasize that transparent messaging, affirmation of employee value, and supportive leadership can buffer the negative effects of downsizing. When employees feel heard and respected—even amid uncertainty—they are more likely to maintain resilience and engagement (Deetz, 1992; Jablin, 1987).

Coping Strategies for Life Transitions

To support employees navigating life changes and downsizing, organizations can:

  • Offer Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and mental health resources
  • Promote resilience training and stress management workshops
  • Encourage open dialogue and normalize emotional responses to change
  • Provide flexible work arrangements and transitional support

Practices such as yoga, mindfulness, and structured reflection have also been shown to reduce cortisol levels and improve emotional regulation during periods of upheaval (MSN Health, 2025).

Workplace Strategy Pack

How Stressed are You?: Managing Workplace Stress

Purpose: To help employees and organizations identify, understand, and manage workplace stress using organizational communication strategies and validated self-assessment tools.

Understanding Workplace Stress

Workplace stress arises when job demands exceed an individual’s capacity to cope, often exacerbated by poor communication, lack of control, and unclear expectations. Chronic stress can lead to burnout, decreased productivity, and health issues (American Institute of Stress, 2024).

Organizational communication plays a critical role in either mitigating or amplifying stress. Transparent messaging, supportive feedback, and inclusive dialogue foster psychological safety and resilience (Rajhans, 2009).

 “How Stressed Are You?” Inventory

Adapted from the American Institute of Stress (2024), this inventory helps individuals assess their current stress levels at work.

Instructions

Rate each statement based on how often it applies to your current job:

Statement Never Rarely Sometimes Often Very Often
Conditions at work are unpleasant or unsafe 1 2 3 4 5
My job negatively affects my physical or emotional well-being 1 2 3 4 5
I have too much work or unreasonable deadlines 1 2 3 4 5
I find it difficult to express my opinions to superiors 1 2 3 4 5
Job pressures interfere with my personal life 1 2 3 4 5
I have inadequate control over my work duties 1 2 3 4 5
I receive inadequate recognition for good performance 1 2 3 4 5
I am unable to fully utilize my skills and talents 1 2 3 4 5

Scoring

  • 8–15: Low stress
  • 16–20: Fairly low stress
  • 21–25: Moderate stress
  • 26–30: High stress
  • 31–40: Severe stress—consider seeking support

Strategies to Reduce Workplace Stress

Strategy Description
Improve Communication Use clear, consistent messaging and active listening to reduce ambiguity.
Encourage Feedback Create safe channels for employees to voice concerns and suggestions.
Promote Autonomy Allow employees control over how they complete tasks.
Recognize Contributions Offer timely, specific praise and rewards.
Support Work-Life Balance Encourage breaks, flexible schedules, and boundary-setting.

Communication Tip

“Stress thrives in silence. Open, empathetic communication is the antidote.” — Inspired by Rajhans (2009)

 

References

American Institute of Stress. (2024). Workplace stress scale. https://www.stress.org/self-assessments/workplace-stress-scale/

Rajhans, K. (2009). Effective organizational communication: A key to employee motivation and performance. Interscience Management Review, 2(2), 81–85. https://www.interscience.in/imr/vol2/iss2/13

Headington Institute. (2020). How stressed are you? Self-assessment inventory. https://www.headington-institute.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/R32-Stress-Test-Eng.pdf

5. Downsizing and Job Insecurity: Organizational Stress Amplified

Among major life changes, downsizing is one of the most disruptive in organizational contexts. It affects not only those who lose their jobs but also those who remain—often referred to as “survivors”—who may experience guilt, anxiety, and increased workload (Moore et al., 2004). These ripple effects can erode trust, morale, and long-term engagement.

A landmark study by the U.S. Department of Labor found that:

  • 59% of companies downsized at least once between 1980–1994
  • Manufacturing firms had the highest rate of downsizing (25%)
  • Retail and service sectors followed at 17% and 15%, respectively (Slocum et al., 1999)

More recent research confirms that downsizing continues to be a chronic organizational stressor, especially in volatile industries and during economic downturns. The consequences include:

  • Elevated psychological strain, absenteeism, and burnout (Kalimo, Taris, & Schaufeli, 2003; APA, 2025)
  • Declines in creativity and innovation, particularly in environments lacking psychological safety (Amabile & Conti, 1999; Lipman, 2024)
  • Increased alcohol use, emotional exhaustion, and reduced performance among employees facing job insecurity (Probst et al., 2007; Sikora et al., 2008)

Job insecurity—whether real or perceived—can trigger pre-traumatic stress responses, including hypervigilance, rumination, and avoidance behaviors (Shehab, 2025). These effects are especially pronounced when layoffs are sudden, poorly communicated, or perceived as unfair.

Communication as a Buffer

Organizational communication scholars emphasize that transparent messaging, affirmation of employee value, and supportive leadership can buffer the negative effects of downsizing (Wisenfeld et al., 2001; Kaiser, 2018). When employees feel heard and respected—even amid uncertainty—they are more likely to maintain resilience and engagement.

Best practices include:

  • Early and honest communication about organizational changes
  • Clear rationale for decisions and acknowledgment of emotional impact
  • Supportive messaging that affirms employee contributions and dignity
  • Access to mental health resources, career counseling, and transitional support

When downsizing is handled with empathy and clarity, organizations can preserve trust and reduce the long-term damage to culture and performance (APA, 2025; Hammer et al., 2024).

6. Unwritten Rules and Ambiguous Communication

In many workplaces, stress doesn’t just come from formal expectations—it emerges from unspoken norms, ambiguous messaging, and unclear feedback loops. These invisible dynamics, often referred to as unwritten rules, shape how employees behave, communicate, and advance—but they can also create confusion, anxiety, and exclusion (Travis, 2013; Robinson, 2024). Unwritten rules are informal expectations about behavior, communication, and performance that are not documented but widely understood—often through observation or trial and error. Examples include:

  • Knowing when it’s “okay” to leave work
  • Understanding how to respond to vague Slack messages like “hey”
  • Navigating office politics or visibility expectations
  • Interpreting silence from leadership as approval or disapproval

These rules often vary by team, manager, or culture, and they disproportionately affect new employees, remote workers, and those from underrepresented backgrounds (Fosslien & Duffy, 2020; Catalyst, 2013).

Ambiguous Communication and Its Effects

Ambiguous communication—such as unclear instructions, vague feedback, or inconsistent messaging—can lead to:

  • Cognitive overload and second-guessing
  • Reduced psychological safety
  • Misinterpretation of tone or intent, especially in digital formats
  • Stress from uncertainty, especially when stakes are high

A 2024 Workhuman study found that 60% of employees encounter unwritten rules that negatively impact their ability to communicate and connect with colleagues. Ambiguity in communication is especially problematic in hybrid and remote environments, where tone and context are harder to interpret (Robinson, 2024).

Coping Strategies and Organizational Solutions

To reduce stress from unwritten rules and ambiguous communication, organizations can:

Organizational Practices

  • Document informal norms: Create “It’s okay to…” lists to clarify expectations (Fosslien & Duffy, 2020; HBR, 2020)
  • Establish communication protocols: Define response time expectations, preferred channels, and tone guidelines
  • Train managers in inclusive messaging: Encourage clarity, empathy, and regular check-ins
  • Use AI-powered tools to flag potentially harmful or unclear language (Robinson, 2024)

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Seek feedback proactively: Ask for clarification when expectations are unclear
  • Observe team dynamics: Learn norms by watching how successful colleagues communicate
  • Build informal networks: Mentors and peers can help decode hidden expectations
  • Practice assertive communication: Express needs and boundaries respectfully

7. Toxic Team Dynamics and Poor Collaboration

Toxic team dynamics and poor collaboration are among the most damaging stressors in organizational life. They erode trust, disrupt communication, and create environments where employees feel isolated, defensive, or unsafe—all of which contribute to chronic stress, disengagement, and turnover (APA, 2024; Davey, 2025).

Toxic teams are often characterized by:

  • Lack of psychological safety: Employees fear speaking up, admitting mistakes, or offering feedback (Inclusion Geeks, 2024; FullTilt, 2024)
  • Broken trust: Leaders micromanage, play favorites, or avoid accountability
  • Communication breakdowns: Passive-aggressive emails, vague instructions, and gossip replace honest dialogue
  • Unresolved conflict: Tension simmers beneath the surface, leading to resentment and avoidance
  • Values drift: Teams lose sight of shared goals and begin rewarding individual heroics over collaboration

These dynamics don’t just affect morale—they corrode performance, increase absenteeism, and stifle innovation (Sloan Management Review, 2022; Psychology Today, 2024).

Collaboration Under Pressure

Stress amplifies dysfunction. When teams are under pressure:

  • Communication becomes reactive and rushed
  • Trust erodes as members become guarded or combative
  • Decision-making suffers from groupthink or conflict escalation
  • Creativity declines as teams revert to safe, familiar routines (Inclusion Geeks, 2024)

Poor collaboration is often rooted in misaligned goals, unclear roles, and lack of empathy—especially in hybrid or remote settings where visibility and tone are harder to interpret (Emergenetics, 2024; Forbes, 2024).

Coping Strategies and Organizational Solutions

To repair toxic dynamics and foster healthy collaboration, organizations can:

Organizational Practices

  • Build psychological safety: Encourage open dialogue, normalize feedback, and protect vulnerability (McKinsey, 2023)
  • Clarify roles and goals: Use shared planning tools and regular check-ins to align expectations
  • Address conflict directly: Train teams in productive conflict and emotional regulation
  • Audit team culture: Use diagnostics to identify dysfunction and track progress (Davey, 2025)

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Detach from drama: Focus on your work and avoid toxic energy
  • Seek allies: Build cross-functional relationships outside your immediate team
  • Practice self-care: Engage in hobbies, mindfulness, and reflection to maintain emotional balance
  • Know when to exit: If toxicity persists and leadership is unresponsive, consider strategic career moves

8. Digital Communication Overload: The Hidden Cost of Constant Connectivity

In today’s digital-first workplace, communication overload has emerged as a major stressor—particularly in hybrid and remote environments. While platforms like email, Slack, Teams, and project management apps were created to facilitate collaboration, their overuse has led to fragmented attention, mental fatigue, and emotional burnout (Brosix, 2023; Together Platform, 2023). Digital communication overload occurs when the volume, frequency, and complexity of messages—across multiple digital channels—exceed an individual’s capacity to process them effectively. Common contributors include:

  • Constant notifications from multiple apps
  • Pressure to respond immediately
  • Difficulty managing multiple communication streams
  • Misinterpretation of tone or intent in text-based messages

Employees now spend approximately 28% of their workweek managing emails alone, with interruptions occurring every 11 minutes and a 25-minute recovery period after each (Brosix, 2023).

Effects on Employees

Impact Area Consequences
Mental Health Anxiety, irritability, and burnout from constant digital stimuli
Productivity Reduced focus, slower decision-making, and missed deadlines
Creativity Limited time for deep work and innovative thinking
Work-Life Boundaries Blurred lines between personal and professional time, especially after hours

Remote workers are especially vulnerable, with 58% reporting pressure to remain digitally available beyond formal work hours (YAROOMS, 2022).

Coping Strategies and Organizational Solutions

Organizational Practices

  • Define clear digital communication expectations and respect off-hours
  • Streamline tools to minimize redundancy (YAROOMS, 2022)
  • Encourage asynchronous communication to reduce urgency (HRD Connect, 2024)
  • Implement communication norms such as “quiet hours” or “no-message blocks”
  • Audit digital workflows and eliminate bottlenecks (Together Platform, 2023)

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Mute non-essential notifications during high-focus tasks
  • Adopt digital detox routines, such as screen-free evenings
  • Set personal boundaries and communicate them respectfully
  • Practice mindfulness to restore focus and emotional regulation
  • Seek human connection through mentorship and voice/video meetings

9. Misaligned Leadership Styles

Leadership is one of the most powerful forces shaping workplace climate—and when leadership style doesn’t align with employee needs, team culture, or organizational goals, it becomes a source of stress rather than a solution (Shrivastava, 2022; Aslan, Sönmez, & Deniz, 2025). A misaligned leadership style occurs when a leader’s approach clashes with:

  • The needs or readiness of their team
  • The demands of the situation
  • The culture or values of the organization

For example, a hands-off, laissez-faire leader may frustrate a team that craves structure and guidance, while an overly directive manager may stifle creativity in a team that thrives on autonomy (Northouse, 2021; Hutchens, 2025).

Consequences of Misalignment

Area of Impact Consequences
Employee Well-being Increased stress, anxiety, and burnout due to unclear expectations or lack of support
Morale and Trust Erosion of confidence, disengagement, and feelings of entrapment
Performance Poor decision-making, inefficiency, and missed goals
Culture Fragmentation, conflict, and high turnover
Misalignment can also lead to organizational silence, where employees withhold feedback or ideas out of fear or frustration, further weakening collaboration and innovation (Moementum, 2025).

Leadership Styles and Stress

Recent research shows that:

  • Charismatic and democratic leaders foster positive climates and reduce stress through clear communication and shared decision-making (Aslan et al., 2025).
  • Autocratic and laissez-faire leaders increase stress and feelings of entrapment, especially when employees lack control or clarity (Shrivastava, 2022; Hutchens, 2025).
  • Situational leadership, while flexible, can backfire if leaders misjudge team readiness or shift styles inconsistently (Northouse, 2021).

Coping Strategies and Organizational Solutions

Organizational Practices

  • Assess leadership fit: Use 360-degree feedback and climate surveys to identify misalignment
  • Train leaders in emotional intelligence and adaptive communication
  • Clarify decision-making authority and expectations to reduce ambiguity
  • Create team agreements that define how leaders and teams collaborate (Moementum, 2025)

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Practice self-reflection: Identify your preferred leadership style and communication needs
  • Seek clarity: Ask for specific expectations and feedback
  • Set boundaries: Protect your time and energy when leadership is inconsistent
  • Build resilience: Use journaling, mentorship, and mindfulness to manage emotional strain

 

10. Cultural and Generational Misalignment

In today’s diverse and multigenerational workplaces, cultural and generational misalignment has emerged as a subtle but powerful source of stress. These misalignments occur when employees’ values, communication styles, and expectations clash with those of their organization or colleagues—often unintentionally. The result? Confusion, disengagement, and emotional strain that can ripple across teams and departments (Nilsen, 2023; Short, 2024). Cultural misalignment happens when an organization’s stated values (e.g., collaboration, transparency, innovation) don’t match its lived practices. For example:

  • A company that promotes “well-being” but rewards overwork
  • A team that claims to value “diversity” but tolerates microaggressions
  • A manager who preaches “respect” but routinely interrupts others

These disconnects erode trust and fuel conflict. Employees may feel disoriented, cynical, or emotionally distant—especially when they can’t reconcile what’s said with what’s done (Short, 2024; Workplace Peace Institute, 2024).

Generational Misalignment: A Growing Divide

With up to five generations now working side by side—from Silent Generation to Gen Z—differences in values, work habits, and communication styles are inevitable. Misalignment often stems from:

  • Communication preferences: Boomers may prefer formal meetings, while Gen Z favors quick chats and emojis (Inclusion Geeks, 2024)
  • Work-life expectations: Gen X may value flexibility for caregiving, while Millennials seek purpose and feedback
  • Technology fluency: Digital natives may feel frustrated by slower tech adoption among older colleagues

These differences can lead to misunderstandings, stereotyping, and interpersonal tension—especially when leaders fail to acknowledge or adapt to generational needs (Pulivarthi Group, 2025; EdStellar, 2025).

Consequences of Misalignment

Type of Misalignment Common Outcomes
Cultural Misalignment Disengagement, passive resistance, high turnover, conflict
Generational Misalignment Miscommunication, reduced collaboration, stereotype-driven bias

Both forms of misalignment can lead to burnout, quiet quitting, and loss of innovation—especially when employees feel unseen or misunderstood.

Coping Strategies and Organizational Solutions

Organizational Practices

  • Audit lived culture vs. stated values: Use behavior-based diagnostics to identify gaps (Nilsen, 2023)
  • Create inclusive communication norms: Blend formal and informal styles to meet generational needs
  • Offer intergenerational mentoring: Pair younger and older employees for mutual learning (EdStellar, 2025)
  • Train leaders in cultural humility: Encourage listening, empathy, and adaptive leadership (Short, 2024)

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Clarify expectations: Ask for specifics when values or norms feel unclear
  • Practice cultural agility: Learn to navigate different styles and values with curiosity
  • Build bridges: Seek allies across generations and cultures to foster understanding
  • Speak up respectfully: Share feedback when misalignment affects your well-being

The Impact of Stress: From Health to Performance

Stress doesn’t just affect how we feel—it reshapes how we think, behave, and perform. In organizational contexts, stress manifests across three interconnected domains: psychological, physiological, and work-related outcomes. These domains influence everything from emotional well-being and physical health to productivity, decision-making, and interpersonal dynamics.

Understanding these dimensions is essential for leaders, teams, and individuals seeking to build resilient, high-performing workplaces. When stress is chronic or unmanaged, it can lead to burnout, illness, and disengagement. But when recognized and addressed proactively, stress can be reframed as a signal for change, adaptation, and support.

In the sections that follow, we’ll explore how stress affects:

  • Psychological outcomes: including mood, cognition, and emotional regulation
  • Physiological outcomes: such as cardiovascular strain, immune suppression, and sleep disruption
  • Work outcomes: including performance, engagement, absenteeism, and turnover

Each area offers insight into how stress operates—and how communication, leadership, and wellness strategies can mitigate its effects.

1. Physiological Outcomes of Stress: What Happens Inside the Body

Stress is not just a feeling—it’s a full-body experience. When triggered, the body initiates a cascade of physiological responses designed to help us survive immediate threats. But in modern organizational life, these responses are often activated by non-life-threatening stressors like deadlines, meetings, or interpersonal conflict. Over time, this chronic activation can lead to serious health consequences.

How the Body Reacts to Stress

When faced with stress, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis releases hormones like cortisol and adrenaline, which:

  • Increase heart rate and blood pressure
  • Suppress digestion and immune function
  • Alter breathing patterns and muscle tension (American Psychological Association, 2023; Williamson, 2025)

These changes are adaptive in the short term—part of the classic “fight or flight” response—but when stress becomes chronic, they contribute to:

  • Cardiovascular strain (e.g., hypertension, increased risk of stroke)
  • Musculoskeletal pain (e.g., tension headaches, back pain)
  • Gastrointestinal issues (e.g., bloating, constipation, acid reflux)
  • Immune suppression, making individuals more vulnerable to illness (APA, 2023; Psychreg, 2025)

Chronic Stress and Long-Term Health

Prolonged exposure to stress hormones can:

  • Accelerate skin aging and trigger flare-ups of conditions like psoriasis and acne (Grossbart, 1992)
  • Disrupt sleep cycles, leading to fatigue and cognitive decline
  • Contribute to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes
  • Increase risk for cardiovascular disease, especially when paired with unhealthy coping behaviors like smoking or poor diet (CPH-NEW, 2024; Talkspace, 2024)

While the direct link between stress and heart attacks remains complex, behavioral patterns associated with stress—such as sedentary lifestyle and poor nutrition—are well-established risk factors (APA, 2023).

Coping Strategies for Physiological Stress

To counteract the physical toll of stress, organizations and individuals can adopt:

  • Mindfulness and breathing exercises to regulate cortisol levels
  • Physical activity to reduce muscle tension and improve cardiovascular health
  • Sleep hygiene practices to restore immune and cognitive function
  • Nutrition education to prevent stress-related eating habits
  • Workplace wellness programs that promote movement, hydration, and recovery breaks (APA, 2023; CDC, 2024)

2. Psychological Outcomes of Stress: Mental Health in the Workplace

Stress doesn’t just wear down the body—it reshapes the mind. Chronic workplace stress is strongly linked to depression, anxiety, emotional exhaustion, and cognitive strain, all of which can impair decision-making, relationships, and overall well-being (American Psychological Association, 2024; Workplace Mental Health, 2024).

How Stress Affects the Brain

Persistent stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, flooding the brain with cortisol and disrupting neurotransmitter balance. This can:

  • Impair emotional regulation and increase irritability
  • Reduce concentration and memory
  • Heighten rumination and worry
  • Lead to sleep disturbances, which further exacerbate mental strain (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2008; CDC, 2024)

Over time, these changes can contribute to clinical depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and burnout—a state of emotional depletion that affects motivation, empathy, and engagement (Workplace Mental Health, 2024).

Mental Health Statistics

  • 33% of Americans report stress accompanied by depression symptoms (APA, 2022)
  • 83% of U.S. workers currently feel work-related stress, with many citing emotional fatigue and irritability (Workplace Mental Health, 2024)
  • Chronic stress is associated with decision fatigue, social withdrawal, and substance use as coping mechanisms (OSHA, 2024)

Coping Strategies for Psychological Stress

To protect mental health in high-stress environments, organizations and individuals can adopt:

Organizational Practices

  • Normalize mental health conversations and reduce stigma
  • Offer Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and counseling resources
  • Train managers to recognize signs of emotional strain and respond empathetically
  • Promote job enrichment and meaningful work to boost morale

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Practice mindfulness and meditation to regulate emotions
  • Build support networks inside and outside of work
  • Use journaling or therapy to process stress
  • Prioritize sleep, movement, and hobbies that restore emotional balance

3. Work Outcomes of Stress: Performance, Commitment, and Turnover

Stress doesn’t just affect health—it reshapes how people show up at work. Chronic stress is consistently linked to declines in job performance, lower organizational commitment, and higher turnover rates (Cropanzano, Rupp, & Byrne, 2003; Podsakoff et al., 2007). It influences both in-role performance (how well employees fulfill their formal duties) and organizational citizenship behaviors—the extra, voluntary efforts that help teams thrive (Gilboa et al., 2008).

Negative Work Outcomes

When stress becomes overwhelming or unmanaged, employees may experience:

  • Reduced productivity and focus
  • Emotional exhaustion, leading to disengagement
  • Irritability and conflict with coworkers or customers
  • Presenteeism, where employees are physically present but mentally depleted
  • Increased absenteeism and turnover, especially in high-stress industries like healthcare and hospitality (Pham, 2024; OSHA, 2024; Shah, 2023)

A recent report from the American Psychological Association (2025) found that stressed employees are more likely to report low motivation, desire to quit, and fatigue-related errors.

The Paradox of Challenge Stressors

Not all stress is harmful. Research shows that moderate levels of challenge stressors—such as tight deadlines or complex tasks—can actually enhance performance for some individuals (Podsakoff, LePine, & LePine, 2007). The key is to stay within the activation zone, where stress energizes rather than exhausts (Quick et al., 1997).

When challenge stressors are paired with:

  • Autonomy
  • Supportive leadership
  • Clear goals and feedback

…employees are more likely to rise to the occasion and perform at higher levels (LeggUP, 2024; Shah, 2023).

Coping Strategies for Work-Related Stress

Organizational Practices

  • Promote work-life balance and flexible scheduling
  • Offer mental health resources and Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs)
  • Encourage recognition and feedback to boost morale
  • Monitor workload distribution and adjust unrealistic demands

Individual Coping Strategies

  • Use time management tools to break tasks into manageable steps
  • Practice mindfulness and regular breaks to sustain focus
  • Set boundaries to protect personal time
  • Seek support from mentors or supervisors when demands feel overwhelming
Figure 7.4

Individuals who are able to find the right balance between work that is too challenging and work that is not challenging enough see increases in performance

Individuals who are able to find the right balance between work that is too challenging and work that is not challenging enough see increases in performance.

Why We Experience Stress Differently: Personality, Culture, and Communication Style

Stress is not a one-size-fits-all experience. How individuals perceive, respond to, and recover from stress is shaped by a complex interplay of personality traits, cultural background, and communication style—each influencing emotional regulation, coping strategies, and workplace dynamics.

1. Personality and Stress Response

Personality plays a central role in how stress is experienced and expressed. The classic Type A vs. Type B framework still offers insight, but modern research expands the conversation:

  • Type A personalities are characterized by urgency, competitiveness, and impatience. These traits correlate with higher stress reactivity, especially in high-pressure environments. Hostility and hyper-reactivity are particularly linked to negative outcomes like burnout and cardiovascular strain (Spector & O’Connell, 1994; Ganster, 1986).
  • Type B personalities tend to be more reflective and relaxed, showing lower physiological arousal in stressful situations and better emotional regulation.

Contemporary models like the Big Five Personality Traits offer deeper nuance:

  • Neuroticism is strongly associated with stress sensitivity and emotional instability.
  • Conscientiousness and agreeableness are linked to proactive coping and resilience (O’Brien & DeLongis, 1996; Carver & Connor-Smith, 2010).

2. Cultural Influences on Stress

Culture shapes how stress is interpreted and managed. For example:

  • Collectivist cultures (e.g., Japan, India) may emphasize harmony and suppress emotional expression, leading to internalized stress.
  • Individualist cultures (e.g., U.S., U.K.) often encourage assertiveness and emotional disclosure, which can buffer stress through social support (Hofstede, 2001; Triandis, 1995).

Cultural norms also influence coping styles:

  • Problem-focused coping is more common in Western contexts.
  • Emotion-focused or avoidance coping may be more prevalent in Eastern or high-context cultures.

3. Communication Style and Stress

Communication style affects how individuals express stress, seek support, and navigate conflict:

  • Assertive communicators tend to manage stress more effectively by setting boundaries and expressing needs clearly.
  • Passive or passive-aggressive styles may lead to unresolved tension and internalized stress (Gupta, 2023; Zurnamer, 2025).
  • Aggressive communicators may externalize stress, creating toxic dynamics and interpersonal strain.

Personality traits like introversion vs. extraversion also influence communication preferences and stress vulnerability. Introverts may internalize stress and avoid confrontation, while extraverts may seek social outlets for relief (16Personalities, 2024).

Coping Strategies Across Differences

To support diverse stress responses, organizations and individuals can:

Organizational Practices

  • Promote inclusive communication norms that respect different styles
  • Offer flexible wellness programs tailored to personality and cultural needs
  • Train managers in emotional intelligence and cultural humility

Individual Strategies

  • Practice self-awareness to understand your stress triggers and coping style
  • Use adaptive communication to express needs and seek support
  • Build cross-cultural empathy to reduce misinterpretation and conflict

Workplace Strategy Pack

Appropriate Stress Outlets

Objective: To equip employees and organizations with effective, research-backed outlets for managing workplace stress through communication, culture, and wellness strategies.

Why Stress Outlets Matter

Workplace stress is a leading contributor to burnout, absenteeism, and reduced productivity. According to the American Institute of Stress, it costs U.S. businesses over $300 billion annually in lost productivity and healthcare expenses.

Organizational communication plays a pivotal role in shaping how stress is experienced and managed. Supportive communication, participatory decision-making, and transparent feedback loops are essential for fostering resilience and psychological safety (Scott, n.d.; Kaiser, 2018).

Appropriate Stress Outlets

Here are evidence-based outlets that help employees manage stress effectively:

1. Open Communication Channels

  • Regular check-ins and feedback sessions
  • Anonymous suggestion boxes or digital platforms
  • Supervisor training in active listening and empathy

“Positive communication and job satisfaction are strong predictors of lower stress levels and fewer cooperation breaches.” — Kaiser (2018)

2. Mindfulness & Relaxation Programs

  • On-site or virtual meditation sessions
  • Breathing exercises and guided imagery
  • Quiet rooms or wellness spaces

3. Physical Activity Opportunities

  • Walking meetings or stretch breaks
  • Subsidized gym memberships or fitness classes
  • On-site yoga or movement workshops

4. Peer Support Networks

  • Mentorship programs
  • Employee resource groups (ERGs)
  • Informal lunch-and-learn sessions

5. Flexible Work Arrangements

  • Remote work options
  • Flexible scheduling
  • Encouragement of boundary-setting (e.g., no emails after hours)

6. Stress Management Training

  • Workshops on time management, resilience, and coping skills
  • Cognitive-behavioral strategies for reframing stress
  • Conflict resolution and assertiveness training

Organizational Communication Strategies

Strategy Impact on Stress Reduction
Transparent Messaging Reduces ambiguity and uncertainty
Participatory Decision-Making Enhances control and ownership
Recognition & Feedback Boosts morale and self-efficacy
Supervisor Support Builds trust and emotional resilience
Conflict Resolution Systems Prevents escalation and promotes psychological safety

References

American Institute of Stress. (2023, May 5). How to address workplace stress for employee well-being. https://www.stress.org/news/how-to-address-workplace-stress-for-employee-well-being/

Kaiser, F. (2018). Understanding stress in communication management: How it limits the effectiveness at personal and organizational level. In B. Peña-Acuña (Ed.), Digital communication management. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/61136

Scott, C. R. (n.d.). Communication, social support, and burnout: A brief literature review. University at Buffalo School of Social Work. https://socialwork.buffalo.edu/content/dam/socialwork/home/self-care-kit/readings/communication-social-support-and-burnout.pdf

American Psychological Association. (2024, October 22). Coping with stress at work. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/work-stress

Sutton, J. (2021). Workplace stress management: 11 best strategies & worksheets. PositivePsychology.com.. https://positivepsychology.com/workplace-stress-management/

Insider Edge

Surviving a Toxic Workplace That Pits Employees Against Each Other

Objective: To equip employees with actionable strategies, grounded in organizational communication research, for navigating and resisting toxic workplace dynamics that deliberately induce stress through manipulation and division.

Understanding the Toxic Dynamic

Toxic workplaces often weaponize stress by fostering competition, favoritism, and distrust. When leadership pits employees against one another, it creates a hostile climate that undermines collaboration, psychological safety, and well-being (Sleek, 2024; Schoenbeck, 2020).

This tactic—sometimes called “divide and conquer management”—is used to maintain control, suppress dissent, and prevent collective resistance. It erodes morale, increases burnout, and drives high turnover (Al Soqair & Al Gharib, 2023).

Signs of Intentional Toxicity

Behavior Impact on Employees
Favoritism and exclusion Fuels resentment and insecurity
Gossip and rumor encouragement Breaks trust and unity
Withholding information Creates confusion and competition
Public comparisons and shaming Undermines confidence and collaboration
Rewarding sabotage or aggression Normalizes unethical behavior

Insider Edge Strategies

1. Build a Micro-Community of Trust

  • Identify allies who share your values
  • Create informal support networks
  • Share information transparently among trusted peers

“Coworker support moderates the effects of toxic leadership and builds resilience.” — Al-Hassani (2025)

2. Practice Strategic Communication

  • Document interactions with toxic leaders
  • Use neutral, professional language
  • Avoid gossip and reactive behavior

3. Clarify Your Values and Boundaries

  • Define your ethical limits
  • Refuse to participate in divisive tactics
  • Use assertive communication to protect your integrity

4. Focus on Psychological Detachment

  • Use mindfulness and cognitive reframing
  • Avoid internalizing toxic narratives
  • Engage in restorative activities outside work

5. Manage Up and Document

  • Keep a record of toxic incidents
  • Communicate concerns through formal channels
  • Seek HR or legal guidance if necessary

Empowerment Tip

“Leadership has nothing to do with rank. You can embody the leader you wish you had.” — Simon Sinek (2024)

References

Al Soqair, N., & Al Gharib, F. (2023). Toxic workplace environment and employee engagement. Journal of Service Science and Management, 16(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2023.166035

Al-Hassani, K. (2025). The effect of toxic leadership on job stress and organizational commitment: The moderating role of coworker support. Indiana Journal of Economics and Business Management, 5(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14779926

Schoenbeck, D. (2020). How to tolerate and outflank an overly competitive coworker. https://daveschoenbeck.com/how-to-tolerate-and-outflank-an-overly-competitive-coworker/

Sleek, S. (2024, June 27). Toxic workplaces leave employees sick, scared, and looking for an exit. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/toxic-workplace

Sinek, S. (2024, February 28). Simon’s tips for combating a toxic work culture. The Optimism Company. https://simonsinek.com/stories/simons-tips-for-combating-a-toxic-work-culture/

Discussion Questions

  1. How might the three phases of General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)—alarm, resistance, and exhaustion—manifest during common workplace challenges such as unclear expectations, heavy workloads, or interpersonal conflict? Think beyond physical strain: what emotional, cognitive, or relational signals might indicate movement from one stage to the next?
  2. Identify two real or hypothetical work scenarios where prolonged exposure to stress could push someone from the resistance phase into exhaustion. Consider factors such as leadership style, lack of recovery time, digital overload, or toxic team dynamics.
  3. What are some effective time management and boundary-setting strategies that help mitigate work-related stress? Reflect on practices that support deep focus and wellbeing—like digital detox windows, mindfulness breaks, or flexible scheduling.
  4. Stress can show up in many ways—physically, emotionally, and behaviorally. Based on what you’ve learned, what symptoms have you noticed in yourself or others during high-pressure times at work? Include subtle signs like changes in communication tone, creativity decline, irritability, or disengagement.

Section 7.3: Thriving Under Pressure: Communication-Based Approaches to Managing Stress

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

  1. Identify effective individual strategies for stress management, such as mindfulness, workload management, and recognizing flow states.
  2. Analyze organizational approaches to reducing stress, including supportive leadership, fair practices, and flexible work policies.
  3. Evaluate the role of communication during change and crisis as a tool for reducing uncertainty and fostering trust.
  4. Explore the potential of emerging technologies like virtual reality and machine learning in enhancing personalized stress management and empathetic communication in hybrid work environments.

Individual Approaches to Managing Stress

The Corporate Athlete: Expanding a High-Performance Model

Stress isn’t just an obstacle—it can be a catalyst for growth. Jack Groppel, a professor of kinesiology and bioengineering at the University of Illinois, recognized that elite athletes didn’t merely endure stress; they trained to thrive under pressure. Inspired by these principles, he introduced the Corporate Athlete model: a framework that helps professionals optimize physical, emotional, and mental energy to achieve peak performance in demanding environments (Groppel & Andelman, 2000).

By adopting proactive rituals—such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, and mindset conditioning—Corporate Athletes don’t just react to stress; they train for it. This approach treats stress as a potential asset: a force that can be converted from distress to eustress, the kind that fuels motivation and creativity (Franks, 2023; APA Dictionary of Psychology, n.d.).

While the model’s foundation remains powerful, today’s workforce faces new challenges that demand expanded strategies. Emerging research in cognitive science, mindfulness, and resilience suggests that individual stress management requires both physical readiness and psychological agility. Modern professionals must not only build strong bodies and minds—they must also cultivate awareness, self-regulation, and connection to effectively navigate workplace pressure (Cásedas, Schooler, Vadillo, & Lupiáñez, 2024; Ferguson, Dinh-Williams, & Segal, 2021; Linder & Mancini, 2021).

What follows is a blended approach: the Corporate Athlete model enhanced with insights from mindfulness, resilience science, and cognitive reframing—giving individuals a full-spectrum toolkit to thrive in high-stress environments.

Flow: Turing Stress into Engagement

Transforming stress into fuel for corporate athleticism is one way to convert a potential adversary into a workplace ally. Another powerful strategy is to break challenges into manageable parts and embrace those that spark joy. In doing so, individuals can enter a state reminiscent of a child at play—fully immersed in the task at hand, losing track of time, and experiencing a deep connection to the challenge before them.

This state of total engagement is known as flow, a concept introduced by psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Flow is defined as a state of consciousness in which a person is completely absorbed in an activity, experiencing a sense of control, clarity, and intrinsic motivation (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). It’s the mental zone where we feel strong, alert, and effortlessly focused.

According to Csikszentmihalyi, the most pleasurable way to work is in harmony with one’s true interests. Work, when approached this way, resembles play—filled with tasks, puzzles, surprises, and rewarding challenges. By breaking down a busy workday into smaller, meaningful pieces, individuals can shift from the “stress” of work to a more engaged and fulfilling state of flow.

Together, corporate athleticism and flow offer complementary pathways for managing stress: one through physical and mental conditioning, the other through psychological immersion and joy. Next, we’ll explore how individual lifestyle choices—such as nutrition, exercise, sleep, and time management—can further reduce stress and enhance performance.

Figure 7.5

High Focus 20% of managers are disengaged at work 10% of managers engage in purposeful work
Low Focus 30% of managers are procrastinators 40% of managers are distracted at work
Low Energy High Energy

A key to flow is engaging at work, yet research shows that most managers do not feel they are engaged in purposeful work.

 

Designing Work That Flows

Keep in mind that work that flows includes the following:

  • Challenge: the task is reachable but requires a stretch
  • Meaningfulness: the task is worthwhile or important
  • Competence: the task uses skills that you have
  • Choice: you have some say in the task and how it’s carried out (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997)

Diet: Fueling the Brain for Peak Performance

What we eat doesn’t just affect our bodies—it directly influences our mental sharpness and stress resilience. Greasy, high-fat foods often leave us feeling sluggish. Why? Because fats take longer to digest, prompting the body to divert blood flow toward the stomach and away from the brain, which can reduce alertness and energy levels.

Similarly, consuming large, heavy meals in the middle of the day may slow cognitive performance. The body prioritizes digestion, pulling resources from mental processing to physical breakdown. In contrast, lighter meals rich in lean protein and omega-3 fatty acids—like wild salmon—can enhance brain function. Fish supports the production of dopamine and norepinephrine, two neurotransmitters associated with alertness, concentration, and faster reaction times (Wurtman & Wurtman, 1988).

By choosing foods that support neurotransmitter activity, individuals can better manage stress and maintain mental clarity throughout the day. Diet, when aligned with performance goals, becomes a strategic tool—not just a source of fuel.

Exercise: Energizing the Mind and Body

Movement isn’t just about physical fitness—it’s a catalyst for mental clarity, emotional regulation, and sustained energy. Regular physical activity stimulates the release of endorphins and serotonin, which elevate mood and reduce stress. But beyond the emotional lift, exercise enhances oxygen flow to the brain, improving focus, memory, and decision-making under pressure.

Sedentary behavior, especially during long workdays, can lead to mental fatigue and sluggishness. When the body remains inactive, circulation slows, and so does cognitive performance. In contrast, even short bursts of movement—like a brisk walk or stretching session—can re-energize the mind by increasing blood flow and activating neural pathways associated with alertness and creativity.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT), yoga, and resistance workouts have all been shown to improve executive function and resilience. According to Ratey (2008), exercise acts as “Miracle-Gro for the brain,” promoting neurogenesis and enhancing the brain’s ability to adapt and recover from stress.

By integrating purposeful movement into daily routines, individuals can sharpen their mental edge and build physical stamina. Exercise, when aligned with performance goals, becomes a strategic asset—not just a wellness checkbox.

Sleep: Breaking the Stress-Fatigue Cycle

Sleep and stress are deeply intertwined in a cycle that can be difficult to escape. Stress disrupts sleep, and poor sleep amplifies stress—leading to reduced focus, irritability, and impaired decision-making. Sleep deprivation doesn’t just affect individual performance; it can ripple through teams, elevating tension and reducing overall productivity.

Insomnia is a widespread issue in the U.S., with approximately one-third of adults reporting difficulty sleeping (Hamilton, Catley, & Karlson, 2007). The consequences extend beyond the workplace. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 684 fatalities in 2021 were linked to drowsy driving—an 8.2% increase from the previous year (Stewart, 2023).

The modern work–life crunch makes restorative sleep feel elusive. Research published in the journal Sleep found that workers suffering from insomnia are significantly more likely to miss work due to exhaustion, costing employers an estimated $1,967 per employee annually—a figure that adds up to over $100 billion in lost productivity across industries (Rosekind et al., 2010).

This cycle is self-reinforcing: employees who miss work due to fatigue often return to heavier workloads, compounding stress and further disrupting sleep. Addressing sleep health isn’t just a personal wellness issue—it’s a strategic imperative for organizations seeking to reduce burnout and improve performance.

Create a Social Support Network: Building Resilience Through Connection

One of the most consistent findings in stress research is that individuals with strong social support networks experience significantly lower stress levels than those without such connections. Social support acts as a buffer, helping individuals cope more effectively with workplace demands and emotional strain (Halbesleben, 2006; Van Yperen & Hagedoorn, 2003).

Support can come from many sources—coworkers, supervisors, friends, and family—and each plays a unique role in reducing stress. In the workplace, fostering a team-oriented atmosphere where colleagues encourage and assist one another can build a culture of shared resilience. Outside of work, simply having someone to talk to and listen to—whether a friend, partner, or family member—can provide emotional relief and perspective.

By cultivating these relationships, individuals not only reduce their own stress but also contribute to a more supportive and emotionally intelligent work environment. Social support isn’t just a comfort—it’s a strategic resource for well-being and performance.

Time Management: Reclaiming Control and Reducing Stress

Time management refers to the development and use of tools or techniques that help individuals work more efficiently and productively. It’s not just about getting more done—it’s about reducing the pressure that comes from feeling overwhelmed. When faced with information overload and competing responsibilities, it’s easy to fall into reactive habits, constantly responding to urgent tasks while neglecting important ones.

Effective time management helps break this cycle. Techniques such as prioritizing, organizing tasks, and maintaining a schedule—whether on paper or digitally—can restore a sense of control and reduce stress. These strategies allow individuals to allocate their energy more intentionally, anticipate challenges, and avoid last-minute scrambles.

Like any skill, time management requires conscious effort and practice. But the payoff is substantial: improved focus, reduced anxiety, and greater confidence in handling daily demands. Research shows that individuals who manage their time well experience lower stress levels and higher satisfaction in both academic and professional settings (Misra & McKean, 2000).

The Enhanced Corporate Athlete Toolkit: A Whole-Person Approach to Managing Stress

Built on the original foundations of Corporate Athleticism, this integrated toolkit helps professionals transform stress into fuel for performance. It combines six core lifestyle strategies with newer evidence-based practices, offering a comprehensive, sustainable approach to individual stress management. Each component supports one or more dimensions of energy—physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual—ensuring individuals have the resources to meet high demands while maintaining well-being.

Integration Enhancements: Expanding the Toolkit

1. Cognitive Reframing

  • Builds on time management and flow by helping individuals reinterpret stressors as challenges rather than threats.
  • Draws from the Transactional Model of Stress, which emphasizes appraisal and coping strategies (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).

2. Mindfulness and Self-Awareness

  • Complements exercise and sleep by improving emotional regulation and attention control.
  • Supported by Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and recent neuroscience research on cognitive change (Cásedas et al., 2024).

3. Resilience Training

  • Adds depth to social support and sleep by focusing on bounce-back ability, grit, and optimism.
  • Often taught through resilience frameworks in leadership development and mental health programs (Linder & Mancini, 2021).

4. Purpose and Values Alignment

  • Enhances the spiritual dimension of the Corporate Athlete by connecting daily work to personal meaning.
  • Encourages reflection practices that reinforce motivation and reduce burnout.

5. Biofeedback and Breathwork

  • Supplements exercise and sleep by helping individuals monitor and regulate physiological stress responses.
  • Techniques like diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation are easy to implement and evidence-based.

Enhanced Corporate Athlete Toolkit

🏛️ Original Pillar 💡 Focus Area 🔗 Integrated Enhancement 🎯 Benefit
Flow Deep engagement in meaningful tasks Mindfulness & Self-Awareness Increases attention, presence, and emotional regulation
Diet Brain-boosting nutrition — (Already aligned) Supports alertness and cognitive stamina
Exercise Energizing physical activity Biofeedback & Breathwork Regulates physiological stress responses
Sleep Restorative recovery Resilience Training Reinforces bounce-back ability and emotional clarity
Social Support Connection and empathy Purpose & Values Alignment Strengthens personal meaning and team cohesion
Time Management Structure and control Cognitive Reframing Shifts perspective to reduce overwhelm and increase adaptability

10 Organizational Approaches to Managing Stress: Creating Cultures of Support and Sustainability

Stress-related issues cost businesses billions of dollars annually through absenteeism, workplace accidents, and lost productivity (Hobson, Delunas, & Kesic, 2001). As a result, managing employee stress is not just a personal wellness concern—it’s a strategic imperative for organizations seeking to maintain performance, engagement, and retention.

Forward-thinking companies are taking proactive steps to address workplace stress. For example, Renault, the French automaker, trains over 2,000 supervisors to recognize and mitigate stress for themselves and their teams. IBM Corporation offers online stress assessments to its global workforce, helping employees develop personalized action plans. Even traditionally high-pressure environments like General Electric (GE) have shifted their tone—bringing in comedians to lighten the atmosphere and replacing the label “bottom 10s” with the more constructive term “less effectives” (Dispatches from the War on Stress, 2007).

1. Clear Expectations: A Cornerstone of Stress Reduction

One of the most effective ways to reduce workplace stress is to establish and communicate clear expectations. Employees with well-defined job roles and task guidelines consistently report lower stress levels than those with ambiguous responsibilities (Jackson & Schuler, 1985; Sauter, Murphy, & Hurrell, 1990).

In today’s dynamic work environments, clarity is more critical than ever. A 2025 workplace survey found that 30% of employees experience less stress when expectations are clearly communicated, and 71% of managers feel responsible for their teams’ wellbeing, including setting clear goals and boundaries (Reward Gateway, 2025). When employees understand what is expected of them, they are more focused, productive, and emotionally grounded.

Stress can be contagious—but so can clarity and contentment. Creating clear expectations doesn’t have to be a top–down directive. In fact, unclear instructions from managers may unintentionally increase employee stress. A collaborative conversation that gently redirects a project or clarifies a task can be a powerful way to reduce tension and foster trust.

In the interest of reducing stress on all sides, it’s essential to frame these moments as opportunities for solution-oriented dialogue, rather than sources of frustration. When expectations are co-created and transparently communicated, employees feel empowered, managers feel supported, and the entire organization benefits.

2. Autonomy and Control: Empowerment as a Stress Buffer

One of the most powerful ways organizations can reduce employee stress is by fostering a sense of autonomy and control. Autonomy—the ability to make decisions about how, when, and where work is done—is consistently linked to lower burnout, higher job satisfaction, and improved mental health (Kossek, Lautschb, & Eaton, 2006).

A lack of control over one’s environment is among the most stressful conditions individuals face. Research shows that employees who feel empowered to influence their work experience significantly less stress, both in the United States and Hong Kong (Schaubroeck, Lam, & Xie, 2000). Similarly, a study comparing American and French employees found that the negative effects of emotional labor were substantially reduced when workers had the autonomy to customize their workspaces and customer interactions (Grandey, Fisk, & Steiner, 2005).

In 2025, autonomy is more than a perk—it’s a psychological necessity. According to the Worklife Digital Report (2025), autonomy is a stronger predictor of wellbeing than traditional perks like free lunches or meditation apps. Employees who can make decisions about their tasks and schedules are more engaged, resilient, and less likely to experience absenteeism.

However, autonomy must be balanced with accountability. Without clear expectations and support, autonomy can lead to confusion and stress. A recent longitudinal study found that within-person increases in job autonomy—especially in roles that already had moderate autonomy—can actually lead to greater emotional exhaustion if not properly supported (Clinton & Conway, 2024).

To maximize the benefits of autonomy:

  • Empower employees with decision-making authority.
  • Prioritize performance outcomes over rigid processes.
  • Foster a culture of trust and open communication.
  • Provide training and clarity around expectations and boundaries.

When autonomy is thoughtfully designed and supported, it becomes a cornerstone of psychological safety and organizational resilience.

3. Fairness and Equity:  The Antidote to Toxic Workplaces

Unfair and unpredictable work environments—often labeled “toxic workplaces”—are those in which employees feel undervalued, disrespected, or excluded (Webber, 1998). These environments not only erode morale but also amplify stress and reduce organizational performance. In contrast, organizations that prioritize fairness and equity consistently outperform those that do not (Huselid, 1995; Pfeffer, 1998; Pfeffer & Veiga, 1999; Welbourne & Andrews, 1996).

Research shows that perceived fairness—both in outcomes and in the processes used to distribute them—acts as a buffer against workplace stress (Judge & Colquitt, 2004; Greenberg, 2004). Employees who feel fairly treated report higher self-esteem, stronger trust in leadership, and greater psychological safety. In one study, nurses who received interpersonal sensitivity training from supervisors felt less stressed—even after a pay cut (Greenberg, 2006).

In 2025, fairness is more than a moral imperative—it’s a strategic necessity. According to the Mind Share Partners & Qualtrics (2025), 78% of employees say fairness and inclusion improve their well-being and engagement. Organizations that invest in equity initiatives see lower burnout, higher retention, and stronger team cohesion.

Harvard researchers Bohnet and Chilazi argue that fairness must be embedded into systems—not just taught in workshops. Their data-driven approach focuses on redesigning key organizational moments where bias tends to surface, such as hiring, promotions, and performance reviews (Bohnet and Chilazi, 2025).

To foster fairness and reduce stress:

  • Ensure transparent decision-making and equitable compensation.
  • Train managers in empathetic leadership and interpersonal sensitivity.
  • Use data to identify bias-prone processes and redesign them for equity.
  • Promote inclusive cultures where all voices are heard and valued.

Fairness isn’t just about doing the right thing—it’s about building resilient, high-performing teams in a rapidly changing world.

Supervisor Support: Work-Family Conflict Survey

Survey Items

Section 1: Supervisor Support (Emotional & Instrumental)

Rate each item on a scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree):

  1. My supervisor is understanding when I have family-related emergencies.
  2. My supervisor encourages me to balance work and family responsibilities.
  3. My supervisor provides flexibility when family demands interfere with work.
  4. My supervisor listens when I talk about family-related stress.
  5. My supervisor helps me find solutions when work-family conflicts arise.
  6. My supervisor respects my non-work time.

Section 2: Work-Family Conflict

Rate each item on a scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always):

  1. My job demands interfere with my family responsibilities.
  2. I feel emotionally drained from work, making it hard to engage with my family.
  3. I miss family activities due to work obligations.
  4. I worry about work problems while I’m at home.
  5. My work schedule makes it difficult to fulfill family duties.

Scoring & Interpretation

  • Supervisor Support Score: Sum of Section 1 items (Range: 6–30)
    • 6–12: Low support
    • 13–20: Moderate support
    • 21–30: High support
  • Work-Family Conflict Score: Sum of Section 2 items (Range: 5–25)
    • 5–10: Low conflict
    • 11–17: Moderate conflict
    • 18–25: High conflict

Higher supervisor support scores are expected to correlate with lower work-family conflict scores, consistent with empirical findings.

References

Frye, N. K., & Breaugh, J. A. (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, work-family conflict, family-work conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-004-0548-4

Geraldes, D., Chambel, M. J., & Carvalho, V. S. (2024). Supervisor support and work-family practices: A systematic review. Societies, 14(12), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120272

Karatepe, O., & Kilic, H. (2007). Supervisor Support and Work–Family Conflict Model Questionnaire [Database record]. PsycTESTS. https://doi.org/10.1037/t26713-000

4. Telecommuting: A Stress Strategic Management Tool

Telecommuting refers to working remotely—whether from home, a satellite office, or even a coffee shop—for part or all of the workweek. This flexibility can significantly reduce stress for many employees by eliminating commutes, allowing for personalized workspaces, and supporting better work–life balance.

In the early 2000s, companies like Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. and AT&T Inc. were pioneers in structured telecommuting programs. Merrill Lynch required employees to complete a two-week simulation in one of its three home office labs and submit detailed work plans and photos of their home setups (Chadderdon, 2008). AT&T estimated that 55% of its U.S.-based managers telecommuted weekly—a practice that gained global traction (AT&T, 2004).

Government agencies also embraced remote work following a 2000 law requiring federal departments to offer telecommuting options. By 2008, 43% of government workers were telecommuting at least part time (Gross, 2008).

Fast forward to today, telecommuting has evolved from a niche perk to a mainstream model. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023), 40.1% of private-sector establishments had employees teleworking in 2021, though that number declined to 27.5% in 2022. A 2025 federal report found that remote work, when implemented thoughtfully, enhances productivity, reduces costs, and improves employee well-being (American Psychological Association, 2025).

A meta-analysis of 12,883 employees found that remote work’s autonomy reduces work–family conflict and boosts job satisfaction, performance, and stress levels (Gajendran & Harrison, 2007). These findings remain consistent in 2025, with newer studies showing that remote-only staff log 51 more productive minutes per day than their office-based peers (Medaris, 2025).

However, telecommuting isn’t stress-free. Common challenges include isolation, blurred boundaries, and environmental distractions. Successful telecommuting hinges on matching the right employees with the right roles and environments. Companies now offer virtual wellness programs, ergonomic stipends, and digital wellness policies to support remote teams (Tarafdar & Stich, 2021).

5. Sabbaticals: A Strategic Pause for Renewal and Retention

Sabbaticals—extended paid time off from regular work duties—have long been a tradition in academia, helping faculty stay current, pursue research, and recharge every five to eight years. Today, this practice has expanded into the corporate world as a strategic response to burnout and a tool for talent retention.

Companies such as Genentech Inc., Container Store Inc., and eBay Inc. now offer paid sabbaticals to employees. According to the Society for Human Resource Management, 11% of employers offered unpaid sabbaticals and 5% offered paid sabbaticals in 2019, the most recent year polled (Sammer, 2022). McDonald’s pioneered corporate sabbaticals in 1977 and continues to offer an eight-week program as of 2023 (O’Loughlin, 2023).

Other companies with formal sabbatical programs include Adobe, Nike, Purina, The Cheesecake Factory, and QuickTrip. Adobe offers four weeks after five years and five weeks after ten years of service, while Purina grants 25 days after five years. At PricewaterhouseCoopers International Ltd., new senior managers and directors can take a four-week paid sabbatical—one week from vacation time and three weeks as a “gift of time” from the firm (O’Loughlin, 2023).

In 2025, sabbaticals are increasingly viewed as essential for organizational health. A recent Forbes report found that 88% of employees experience burnout, with one in five contemplating quitting daily. Companies like Salesloft now offer six-week paid sabbaticals with a $10,000 stipend to encourage deep rest and personal growth (Castrillion, 2025). Research shows that sabbaticals improve resilience, creativity, and organizational performance, with 75% of leaders returning with fresh visions and nearly half implementing new innovations (Castrillion, 2025).

Rather than a luxury, sabbaticals are now a competitive advantage—a way to retain top talent, foster innovation, and build a healthier workplace culture.

6. Access to Support Services

There are times when life outside work causes stress in ways that will impact our lives at work and beyond. These situations may include the death of a loved one, serious illness, drug and alcohol dependencies, depression, or legal or financial problems that are impinging on our work lives. Although treating such stressors is beyond the scope of an organization or a manager, many companies offer their employees outside sources of emotional counseling. Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) are often offered to workers as an adjunct to a company-provided health care plan. Small companies in particular use outside employee assistance programs, because they don’t have the needed expertise in-house. As their name implies, EAPs offer help in dealing with crises in the workplace and beyond. EAPs are often used to help workers who have substance abuse problems.

7. Intelligent Voice Assistants (IVAs) and AI-Enhanced Communication

Another modern communication strategy contributing to reduced workplace stress is the integration of Intelligent Voice Assistants (IVAs). Once simple command-based tools, today’s IVAs have evolved into agentic AI colleagues that assist with everything from task coordination to emotional support. These tools—used across departments such as HR, finance, and sales—leverage real-time reasoning, voice synthesis, and natural language processing to offer employees a more seamless and personalized work experience (McKinsey & Company, 2025). Companies like Leena AI and SoundHound AI have launched voice-enabled platforms where employees can interact conversationally to schedule meetings, retrieve files, update CRM systems, and more (Dollins, 2025). These assistants often come with personalized identities, Slack profiles, and preferences, helping foster familiarity and reduce cognitive load during multitasking (Sippio, 2025).

In hybrid and remote environments, IVAs serve as reliable communication partners by enabling hands-free productivity, offering emotional comfort through empathetic voice interactions, and expanding access for employees with disabilities (Pageon.ai, 2025). For example, SoundHound’s Amelia 7.0 platform uses automatic speech recognition and large language models to handle multi-stage customer interactions and automate IT tasks without human intervention (Das, 2025). Early reports indicate that departments using IVAs experience up to 50% increases in productivity while reducing stress caused by unclear instructions or repetitive administrative tasks (McKinsey & Company, 2025). As organizations explore new ways to create responsive and humane workplaces, IVAs are rapidly becoming valuable allies in supporting psychological well-being and operational clarity.

8. Psychological Safety and Informal Communication

Another increasingly vital strategy for reducing workplace stress is fostering psychological safety through informal communication. Psychological safety refers to an employee’s belief that they can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes, and share ideas without fear of punishment or humiliation (Edmondson, 1999). In 2025, this concept has gained traction as a cornerstone of resilient, high-performing teams—especially in hybrid and remote environments where spontaneous connection is harder to maintain (Cote, 2025). Informal communication—such as casual chats, impromptu video calls, and “structured informality” like jazz dialogues—has proven essential for building trust and reducing interpersonal tension (Ford, 2024). These moments of unscripted interaction help employees feel seen and heard, which in turn buffers stress and improves collaboration.

Research shows that psychological safety enhances employee engagement, creativity, and retention. For example, Google’s Project Aristotle found that psychological safety was the single most important factor in team success, surpassing even technical expertise (Franco, 2025). Similarly, Edmondson’s work revealed that high-performing teams report more errors—not because they make more mistakes, but because they feel safe enough to acknowledge and learn from them (Duncan, 2025). This kind of openness is especially critical in high-stakes industries like healthcare and technology, where rapid decision-making and adaptive learning are essential (Araya-Fischel, 2025).

Leaders play a pivotal role in cultivating psychological safety. By modeling vulnerability, inviting dissent, and encouraging inclusive dialogue, they create environments where employees feel empowered to contribute authentically. Harvard’s Dynamic Teaming framework emphasizes that psychological safety is not about comfort—it’s about candor, curiosity, and constructive risk-taking (Cote, 2025). When employees feel safe to challenge ideas, share concerns, and engage in honest feedback, stress levels decrease and innovation flourishes.

9. Communication During Transformation and Crisis

Another increasingly relevant strategy for reducing stress in organizations is intentional communication during transformation and crisis. In times of change—whether driven by digital innovation, restructuring, or cultural shifts—employees often experience uncertainty, skepticism, and emotional fatigue (Allen, 2025). Without clear and consistent messaging, confusion and resistance can quickly take root. Research shows that structured communication timelines, transparent messaging, and role-based communication are essential for maintaining trust and engagement during transitions (Institute of Internal Communication, 2025; Myers, 2025). Leaders who communicate with clarity, empathy, and purpose can transform disruption into alignment. For example, celebrating milestones, hosting open forums, and empowering managers as communication champions have been shown to boost morale and reduce resistance (Allen, 2025). In today’s fast-paced, hybrid workplaces, communication must be proactive—not reactive—and designed to foster connection, not just convey information. When employees understand the “why” and “how” of change, they are more likely to embrace it, reducing stress and strengthening organizational resilience.

10. VR and ML for Personality-Aware Communication

Organizations are also beginning to explore virtual reality (VR) and machine learning (ML) as tools for personality-aware communication and stress reduction. Recent studies show that immersive VR environments can help employees develop empathetic communication skills, especially in leadership roles (Queiroz et al., 2025). For example, managers who practiced performance reviews in VR—then experienced the conversation from the employee’s perspective—showed increased emotional awareness and used more empathetic language. Eye-tracking and behavioral data collected during these simulations were used to predict personality traits like agreeableness and conscientiousness with high accuracy (Parra Vargas et al., 2024). These insights allow organizations to tailor communication styles, training programs, and team dynamics to individual needs. Adaptive VR systems can also detect cognitive load and stress in real time using physiological signals like heart rate variability and eye movement, enabling dynamic adjustments to training or workload (Nasri, 2025). While still emerging, these technologies offer promising avenues for personalized stress management and leadership development—especially in remote and hybrid settings where emotional cues are harder to detect.

In today’s complex and rapidly evolving work environment, effective stress management requires a multilayered approach that bridges individual empowerment and organizational strategy. From mindfulness practices and flexible work arrangements to leadership development and personality-aware technologies, each tactic plays a role in fostering a healthier, more resilient workforce. Intentional communication during periods of transformation can anchor teams through uncertainty, while emerging tools like VR and ML offer unprecedented personalization for stress reduction and empathetic engagement. Ultimately, organizations that invest in both human-centered design and data-driven innovation are better positioned to create environments where employees can thrive—not just survive. By aligning personal wellbeing strategies with broader cultural and structural support, companies can reduce stress, boost productivity, and cultivate long-term resilience across the entire organization.

Discussion Questions

  1. Have you ever experienced a state of “flow” at work or school? What conditions helped create that experience, and how did it impact your performance or well-being?
  2. In your opinion, who holds the greater responsibility for managing employee stress—individual employees or organizations? Consider strategies like leadership training, communication practices, and personalized support technologies in your response.
  3. Do you believe most organizations foster a fair and psychologically safe environment? Share any experiences or examples that support your viewpoint.
  4. What are your thoughts on remote or hybrid work arrangements? How might tools like VR or AI-based stress detection shape your personal experience, and what do you see as potential benefits or drawbacks?

Section 7.4: The Mood of the Room: Understanding Emotional Contagion

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the follow:

  1. Define emotions and describe their role in workplace dynamics.
  2. Understand how emotions are short, intense reactions tied to specific events, and explore their influence on decision-making, behavior, and organizational culture.
  3. Differentiate between types of emotions and their potential impacts.
  4. Identify positive and negative emotions commonly experienced at work, and examine how they can shape creativity, conflict resolution, and performance.
  5. Explain emotional contagion and its mechanisms in traditional and digital environments.
  6. Analyze how emotions spread within teams and organizations—both face-to-face and through digital communication—and explore factors that influence susceptibility and regulation.

Emotions

Types of Emotions

While financial analysts measure a company’s worth by profits and stock price, employees evaluate their jobs by a different metric: emotion. Rooted in the French word émouvoir, meaning “to stir up,” emotion is inherently active—capable of shifting perspectives, influencing behavior, and shaping the climate of entire organizations.

Formally, emotions are short, intense reactions to specific events. But their power goes far beyond momentary feelings. A manager’s tone might energize one employee, frustrate another, and leave a third in tears—all in the same meeting. Emotions shape whether someone embraces feedback, walks away from a position, or thrives within a team (Cole et al., 2008; George & Jones, 1996; Gino & Schweitzer, 2008).

Positive Emotions: Fuel for Growth and Creativity

Emotions like joy, love, and surprise emerge when something desirable happens—meeting a goal, receiving praise, or hearing good news. These feelings bring a sense of gain, often described as peacefulness or contentment. They’re powerful catalysts:

  • Boost optimism and resilience (Kirby, 2001)
  • Spark upward spirals—good moods leading to good outcomes, reinforcing positivity (Frederickson & Joiner, 2002)
  • Enhance creativity and openness to new ideas
  • Increase emotional engagement with products, teams, and leaders

Companies like Microsoft analyze emotional reactions to improve product appeal, while Apple has famously cultivated emotional loyalty among users (Weler, 2008).

Negative Emotions: Signals for Change

Emotions such as anger, fear, and sadness often arise from undesirable events—being ignored, micromanaged, or treated unfairly. Left unchecked, they can breed conflict and isolation. Yet they aren’t just destructive:

  • Anger can fuel determination and competition
  • Jealousy might inspire effort to outperform rivals
  • Sadness may prompt introspection or deeper collaboration

The key isn’t to suppress negative emotions but to manage them well (Jordan et al., 2006). When guided constructively, they can prompt innovation, personal growth, and organizational improvement.

Emotional Contagion

Emotions in the workplace are not confined to individuals—they ripple outward, shaping team dynamics, organizational culture, and even decision-making. Emotional contagion refers to the process by which people “catch” emotions from others through verbal and nonverbal cues, often unconsciously (Hatfield, Cacioppo, & Rapson, 1994). While both positive and negative emotions are contagious, research consistently shows that negative emotions tend to linger longer and spread more deeply than positive ones (Liu et al., 2025). This asymmetry is often attributed to evolutionary mechanisms: emotions like anger, fear, and suspicion are linked to survival responses and are designed to provoke immediate action.

In team settings, emotional contagion can be especially potent. Ilies, Wagner, and Morgeson (2007) found that team members influence one another’s emotional states even after controlling for performance outcomes. More recent studies have expanded this understanding to digital environments, showing that emotional contagion occurs through email, chat platforms, and video conferencing—where tone, timing, and emoji use can all transmit affect (Goldenberg & Gross, 2025; Chen et al., 2025). This phenomenon, known as digital emotion contagion, has become increasingly relevant in hybrid and remote work contexts.

Susceptibility to emotional contagion varies across individuals. Some people are more emotionally permeable than others, a trait linked to empathy, personality, and emotional regulation capacity (Papousek, Freudenthaler, & Schulter, 2008; Clarkson et al., 2024). Leaders, in particular, play a pivotal role in shaping emotional climates. When a manager expresses optimism and calm, it can elevate team morale; conversely, a leader’s stress or frustration can cascade through the organization (Bono & Ilies, 2006; Barsade, Coutifaris, & Pillemer, 2018). This is especially true in high-interdependence teams, where emotional alignment is critical to collaboration.

Consider a frontline service scenario: a fast-food employee begins the day in a neutral mood. A tense interaction with a customer triggers frustration, which persists long after the customer leaves. That frustration may color subsequent interactions, increase error rates, and contribute to a negative emotional spiral. Pugh (2001) and Hareli and Rafaeli (2007) demonstrated that such emotional spillover can affect not only coworkers but also customers, creating a feedback loop of negativity.

However, emotional contagion is not inherently harmful. Positive emotional contagion—such as enthusiasm, gratitude, or humor—can enhance creativity, resilience, and team cohesion. Recent research also explores counter-contagion, the ability of individuals to resist or neutralize emotional influence, which is especially valuable in high-stress environments (Michalec et al., 2025). Organizations are increasingly investing in emotional intelligence (EI) training and emotion-aware design to help employees regulate their own emotions and buffer against negative contagion (Cao & Cao, 2025).

In sum, emotional contagion is a powerful force in organizational life. Understanding its mechanisms—especially in digital and hybrid contexts—can help leaders foster healthier emotional climates and mitigate the risks of unchecked negativity.

Workplace Strategy Pack

Practicing Emotional Change at Work

Objective

To help employees recognize, regulate, and intentionally shift their emotional responses in workplace settings—enhancing communication, reducing conflict, and fostering psychological safety.

Why It Matters

Emotions are not just personal—they’re communicative. In the workplace, emotional reactions influence how we interpret feedback, collaborate with others, and respond to stress. According to Affective Events Theory (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996), workplace events trigger emotional responses that shape behavior and job satisfaction. Emotional regulation—not suppression—is key to building trust, resilience, and effective teams (Eliadis, 2025).

Changing your emotional response doesn’t mean ignoring how you feel—it means learning to respond with intention rather than impulse.

Strategy Toolkit

Practice How to Use It
Name the Emotion Use emotional vocabulary to identify what you’re feeling (e.g., frustrated, anxious, proud). Naming reduces intensity.
Pause and Reframe Before reacting, ask: “What else could be true?” Reframing helps shift perspective and reduce defensiveness.
Use Affective Journaling Track emotional triggers and responses. Reflect on patterns and progress over time.
Practice Emotional Substitution Replace reactive emotions with constructive ones. Example: shift from irritation to curiosity.
Engage in Mindful Breathing Use short breathing exercises to calm the nervous system and regain clarity.
Seek Feedback on Emotional Impact Ask trusted colleagues how your emotional responses affect team dynamics. Use this insight to adjust.

“You can’t control every situation—but you can choose your emotional response.” Emotional agility is a skill. The more you practice, the more influence you gain—not just over yourself, but over the culture around you.

References
Eliadis, A. (2025, June 20). Emotions at work: Why regulation, not repression, builds stronger teams. Forbes Coaches Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/06/20/emotions-at-work-why-regulation-not-repression-builds-stronger-teams/

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.

Freis, T. (2025). Emotion management in organizations: The transformation of unreachable feelings to modifiable communication. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1505275

Insider Edge

Empowering Yourself When One Colleague Is the Source of Stress

Objective: To help employees strategically respond to interpersonal stress caused by a single colleague using communication tools, boundary-setting, and empowerment techniques grounded in organizational research.

Understanding the Stress Dynamic

When one colleague becomes a persistent source of stress—through micromanagement, passive aggression, exclusion, or undermining—it can erode psychological safety and job satisfaction. These behaviors often go unchecked in organizations lacking clear communication norms or conflict resolution mechanisms (Linvill, 2025; Kaiser, 2018).

Such stress is not just interpersonal—it’s organizational. It affects productivity, morale, and retention. Empowering yourself means reclaiming control over your emotional and communicative responses.

Insider Edge Strategies

1. Use Assertive Communication

  • Practice “I” statements: “I feel undermined when my ideas are dismissed in meetings.”
  • Stay calm and factual—avoid emotional escalation
  • Document interactions if patterns persist

“Assertive communication reduces ambiguity and helps establish boundaries in toxic interactions.” — Kaiser (2018)

2. Build Psychological Safety Elsewhere

  • Connect with trusted coworkers
  • Seek mentorship or peer support
  • Reinforce your value through collaborative projects

3. Reframe and Detach

  • Use cognitive reframing: “Their behavior reflects their insecurity, not my worth.”
  • Practice emotional detachment techniques like mindfulness and journaling
  • Avoid gossip or retaliation—it fuels the stress cycle

4. Empower Yourself Through Meaningful Work

  • Focus on tasks that align with your strengths
  • Set micro-goals to maintain motivation
  • Celebrate small wins to reinforce self-efficacy

5. Engage Leadership Strategically

  • If safe, raise concerns with a supervisor or HR
  • Frame the issue in terms of team productivity and morale
  • Use documented examples to support your case

Empowerment Tip

“Empowerment is not about control—it’s about clarity, courage, and connection.” — Tripathi & Bharadwaja (2020)

References

Kaiser, F. (2018). Understanding stress in communication management: How it limits the effectiveness at personal and organizational level. In B. Peña-Acuña (Ed.), Digital communication management. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/61136

Linvill, J. S. (2025). “I just feel like I can’t connect”: Understanding targets’ organizational identification through experiences with destructive workplace behaviors. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1145411

Tripathi, N., & Bharadwaja, M. (2020). Empowering leadership and psychological health: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 32(3), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-020-09349-9

American Psychological Association. (2024, October 22). Coping with stress at work. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/work-stress

 

Discussion Questions

  1. How easy or difficult is it to regulate your emotions at work, especially in high-stress or digital environments? Consider moments when you’ve had to manage your emotions during video calls, emails, or team meetings. What strategies helped—or didn’t?
  2. Which emotions do you think are encouraged or rewarded in today’s workplace? Which ones are suppressed or discouraged? Reflect on how organizational norms, leadership behavior, and even emojis shape emotional expression at work.
  3. What internal and external factors tend to influence your emotional state during the workday? Think about your personal disposition, team dynamics, leadership tone, and digital communication.
  4. Share a specific example of emotional contagion you’ve witnessed or experienced—positive or negative. What triggered the emotional shift, and how did it spread across individuals or teams? What helped to amplify or interrupt the contagion?
  5. How do you typically respond when you’re in a negative emotional state? What tools or techniques help you reset your mood—and are they different in remote vs. in-person settings? Explore the effectiveness of strategies like mindfulness, humor, reframing, emotional intelligence training, or digital boundaries.

Section 7.5: Professional Poise: Navigating Emotional Expectations at Work

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

  1. Understand how specific workplace events can trigger emotional reactions, and how those reactions shape employee attitudes and behavior.
  2. Examine how emotions—both positive and negative—impact decision-making, interpersonal relationships, and overall organizational climate.
  3. Define emotional labor and evaluate its effects on individual well-being, job satisfaction, and professional performance.
  4. Learn the components of emotional intelligence and how they contribute to effective communication, conflict resolution, and leadership.

In today’s workplace, emotions are more than fleeting feelings—they’re powerful forces that shape how people think, act, and relate to others. For employees, especially those balancing multiple jobs and financial pressures, emotional experiences at work can influence not only how they feel about their role, but also how they behave on the job. Emotions help define the perceived value of a job, a company, or a team, and they play a central role in shaping workplace attitudes and performance.

One foundational framework for understanding this connection is Affective Events Theory (AET), developed by Weiss and Cropanzano (1996). AET proposes that specific events at work—whether positive or negative—trigger emotional reactions that influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors. These reactions are not universal; people respond differently depending on their personality, values, and context. For example, a manager’s casual compliment might make one employee feel proud and energized, while another might feel anxious or skeptical. These emotional responses can lead to affect-driven behaviors, such as volunteering to help a colleague or withdrawing from team interactions (Fisher, 2002).

Figure 7.11

According to Affective Events Theory, six emotions are affected by events by work. These emotions are Fear, Joy, Surprise, Love, Sadness, and Anger

According to Affective Events Theory, six emotions are affected by events at work.

Recent research has expanded AET to include coping strategies and individual dispositions, showing that how people manage emotions—especially negative ones like anger or frustration—can significantly affect outcomes like goal achievement, burnout, and team cohesion (Umbra & Fasbender, 2025). Emotional experiences at work accumulate over time, shaping job satisfaction in ways that go beyond salary or perks. In fact, satisfaction often stems from “inside-in” factors: personality traits, emotional regulation, and the meaning people attach to everyday interactions (Fripp, 2025).

When emotional demands are high and support is low, employees may experience burnout, a chronic state of emotional exhaustion and disengagement. Burnout is now recognized as a global workplace crisis, with younger workers—especially Gen Z and Millennials—reporting peak burnout as early as age 25 (Interview Guys, 2025). Symptoms include anxiety, depression, irritability, and physical health issues, all of which can spill over into customer service, team dynamics, and organizational culture. Emotional regulation—not repression—is key to managing these challenges and building resilient, high-performing teams (Eliadis, 2025).

Emotional Labor: Performing Feelings on the Job

In today’s service-driven economy, emotional labor has become a defining feature of many jobs—especially those that require face-to-face interaction with customers, clients, or students. Unlike manufacturing roles, where emotional expression is rarely part of the job, service workers are expected to project warmth, patience, and professionalism regardless of how they actually feel. This expectation creates a unique challenge: employees must regulate their emotions not just for personal well-being, but to meet organizational standards (Grandey, 2000).

Emotional labor refers to the effort required to manage feelings and expressions to fulfill the emotional requirements of a job. Sociologist Arlie Hochschild (1983) identified three key strategies: surface acting, deep acting, and genuine expression. Surface acting involves faking emotions—smiling when frustrated or appearing calm when anxious. Deep acting goes further, requiring employees to actively generate the emotions they’re expected to display. Genuine expression, the least taxing form, occurs when the emotions required by the job align with what the employee truly feels.

Recent research shows that surface acting is associated with higher stress, emotional exhaustion, and reduced job satisfaction (Sayre, Chi, & Grandey, 2025; Hu et al., 2025). It can also spill over into other areas of life, leading to irritability, sleep disruption, and strained relationships. Deep acting, while more effortful, is linked to better performance and lower burnout—especially when supported by empowering leadership and job autonomy (Cheng et al., 2025; Popucza et al., 2025). In contrast, genuine emotional expression tends to be the most sustainable, as it requires little internal conflict.

 

Figure 7.12

When it comes to acting, the closer to the middle of the circle that your actions are, the less emotional labor your job demands. The further away, the more emotional labor the job demands. From the inner circle to the outer, the sections are: employee personality, genuine acting, deep acting, and surface acting

When it comes to acting, the closer to the middle of the circle that your actions are, the less emotional labor your job demands. The further away, the more emotional labor the job demands.

Emotional labor is especially prevalent in service roles that are both emotionally demanding and financially undervalued—such as hospitality, education, and healthcare (Afshar et al., 2025; Yoo et al., 2025). These jobs often require employees to manage emotionally charged situations, like calming an angry customer or comforting a grieving family. When the emotions displayed are authentic, the strain is minimal. But when there’s a mismatch between felt and expressed emotions, workers may experience cognitive dissonance—a psychological discomfort caused by conflicting beliefs, feelings, or behaviors (Chattha, 2023; Dalla-Camina, 2025).

For example, a flight attendant may feel frustrated after being treated rudely but must continue smiling and offering service. Over time, this disconnect can lead to burnout, especially if the employee lacks autonomy or support. Studies show that breaks, mindfulness, and emotionally intelligent leadership can help mitigate the effects of emotional labor (Afshar et al., 2025; Sayre et al., 2025). Organizations that recognize emotional labor as a legitimate form of work—and provide resources to support it—are more likely to retain employees and foster well-being.

Emotional Intelligence: Understanding and Managing Emotions at Work

Emotional intelligence (EI) is the ability to recognize, understand, and manage emotions—both your own and those of others. In today’s workplace, where collaboration, empathy, and adaptability are essential, EI has emerged as a key predictor of success. The concept was first introduced by psychologists Peter Salovey and John Mayer, and later popularized by Daniel Goleman, who emphasized its role in leadership, teamwork, and well-being (Goleman, 1995).

At its core, emotional intelligence helps individuals bridge the gap between their internal emotional experiences and the emotional expectations of their professional roles. Asking questions like “What am I feeling?” and “What are others feeling?” is central to developing EI. This awareness is especially important in service-oriented jobs, where emotional labor—managing emotions to meet organizational expectations—is common.

There are four foundational components of emotional intelligence: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002; Weisinger, 1998). Self-awareness involves accurately identifying and expressing your emotions. Self-management refers to the ability to regulate emotional responses, especially under pressure. Social awareness is the capacity to empathize and understand others’ emotional states. Relationship management involves using emotional insight to build trust, resolve conflict, and foster collaboration.

Figure 7.13

The four steps of emotional intelligence build upon one another. From the bottom step to the top step is self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, and relationship management

The four steps of emotional intelligence build upon one another.

In the workplace, emotionally intelligent individuals are better equipped to form cohesive teams, navigate interpersonal challenges, and lead with empathy. Goleman (1998) found that empathy—understanding and sharing the feelings of others—is a cornerstone of effective teamwork. Employees with high EI are more likely to perceive adversity as a challenge rather than a threat, and they tend to have greater self-efficacy, resilience, and life satisfaction (Law, Wong, & Song, 2004; Mikolajczak & Luminet, 2008).

Recent trends in organizational psychology emphasize the strategic value of emotional intelligence. In 2025, emotionally intelligent leaders are seen as essential for managing hybrid teams, fostering inclusion, and supporting mental health in high-stress environments (Gave, 2024; Wilcox, 2025; Team DILAN, 2025). Companies are investing in EI training to improve decision-making, reduce burnout, and enhance employee engagement. As automation reshapes the workplace, emotional intelligence remains a uniquely human skill—one that cannot be outsourced or replaced.

Insider Edge

Keeping Your Cool with a Toxic Manager

Objective: To equip employees with emotional regulation strategies and communication tools to maintain professionalism and protect well-being when working under a toxic manager.

Understanding the Emotional Toll

Toxic managers often exhibit behaviors such as micromanagement, manipulation, public criticism, and favoritism. These behaviors can trigger emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and workplace deviance (Ahmed et al., 2024). Emotional dysregulation in response to such leadership can impair decision-making, damage reputations, and escalate conflict.

Rather than suppressing emotions or reacting impulsively, emotional regulation allows employees to respond with clarity, professionalism, and self-control (Eliadis, 2025).

Insider Edge Strategies

1. Practice Emotional Regulation, Not Repression

  • Recognize early signs of emotional escalation (e.g., racing thoughts, tension)
  • Use grounding techniques: deep breathing, counting, or brief walks
  • Reframe the situation: “This is about their behavior, not my worth.”

“Emotional regulation is a learned competency that restores cognitive clarity and supports professional outcomes.” — Eliadis (2025)

2. Use Strategic Communication

  • Keep responses neutral and fact-based
  • Avoid sarcasm, defensiveness, or emotional outbursts
  • Document interactions for clarity and protection

3. Build Emotional Buffer Zones

  • Create supportive relationships outside the toxic dynamic
  • Engage in restorative activities (e.g., hobbies, exercise, journaling)
  • Limit unnecessary exposure to the toxic manager when possible

4. Strengthen Your Internal Narrative

  • Affirm your values and strengths daily
  • Use self-talk to reinforce boundaries: “I control my response.”
  • Focus on long-term goals rather than short-term frustrations

5. Seek Constructive Channels

  • If safe, raise concerns through HR or formal feedback systems
  • Frame issues in terms of team impact, not personal grievance
  • Use documented examples to support your case

Empowerment Tip

“Toxic leadership may hijack the environment, but emotional regulation lets you reclaim your mind.” — Inspired by Ahmed et al. (2024) & Eliadis (2025)

References

Ahmed, A. K., Ramadan Atta, M. H., El-Monshed, A. H., & Mohamed, A. I. (2024). The effect of toxic leadership on workplace deviance: The mediating effect of emotional exhaustion and the moderating effect of organizational cynicism. BMC Nursing, 23, Article 669. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02308-x

Eliadis, A. (2025, June 20). Emotions at work: Why regulation, not repression, builds stronger teams. Forbes Coaches Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/06/20/emotions-at-work-why-regulation-not-repression-builds-stronger-teams/

Laguda, E. (2021). Toxic leadership: Managing its poisonous effects on employees and organizational outcomes. In S. Dhiman (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of workplace well-being (pp. 969–999). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30025-8_71

Duffy, M. K., & Yu, L. (2018). Toxic emotions at work. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 487–498). Sage Reference.

Discussion Questions

  1. Reflect on a job or team experience where you felt emotionally drained. Was emotional labor involved—for example, needing to act cheerful, composed, or confident when you didn’t feel that way? What strategies did you use (or wish you had used) to cope?
  2. Why do you think pretending to be happy when you’re not can lead to exhaustion or burnout? Have you experienced this yourself, and what techniques—such as breaks, deep acting, or emotional awareness—help you reset?
  3. In your opinion, how does emotional intelligence affect teamwork, leadership, or customer interactions? Are there specific situations you’ve seen or experienced where emotional intelligence made a difference?

Section 7.6: The Role of Ethics and National Culture

Learning Objectives

After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:

  1. Analyze the Interplay Between Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making Explore how emotional responses influence moral judgment in organizational settings, and evaluate strategies for recognizing emotions as ethical cues in the workplace.
  2. Examine the Cultural Dimensions of Work Stress and Recovery Investigate how national cultural norms shape attitudes toward leisure time, vacation policies, and stress management, and assess the implications for employee well-being across global contexts.

In organizational settings, we often explore the tension between the emotions we feel internally and the ones we’re expected to display publicly—a mismatch that can lead to emotional labor and distress. But what happens when there’s a gap between our emotions and our core beliefs or ethical values? That disconnect can be even more disorienting, influencing how we make moral decisions at work.

Neuroscientist and philosopher Joshua Greene uses brain imaging to study how people respond to moral dilemmas. In a classic example, Greene presents two versions of the trolley problem:

  • In the first, participants are asked to imagine diverting a runaway trolley onto a track that will kill one person instead of five. Most say this is the “least harmful” option—difficult, but ethically acceptable.
  • In the second scenario, participants must imagine pushing a large man onto the tracks to stop the trolley and save five lives. This time, most find the act emotionally and morally unacceptable, even though the outcome is mathematically the same.

Greene’s research shows that emotional intensity changes how people judge right and wrong. In the second scenario, participants used more of their brains, especially areas tied to emotion. He writes, “These differences in emotional engagement affect people’s judgments” (Greene et al., 2001).

At work, these findings apply in subtle ways: when we feel uncomfortable about something—whether it’s bending a rule, overlooking a mistake, or staying silent during an ethical conflict—we’re often grappling with our emotions as moral signals. These emotions aren’t just noise. They help guide our behavior, shape ethical norms, and define workplace culture.

By learning to recognize, understand, and channel our emotional responses, we build a more ethical and empathetic work environment. Emotions can connect us—but only if we allow ourselves to listen.

Lack of Leisure Time and Stress in Cross-Cultural Communication

Across cultures, the way people experience work and leisure varies dramatically—but one common thread is the growing concern over chronic stress and insufficient recovery.

Economist Steven Landsburg highlights a stark contrast: Americans work longer hours than their European counterparts—about three hours more per week than the French, and they take fewer and shorter vacations (Landsburg, 2006). In fact, many Americans don’t take full advantage of their paid time off. A 2023 Pew Research Center study found that nearly half of U.S. workers with paid leave take less time off than they’re offered, often due to concerns about burdening colleagues or missing out on career opportunities (Horowitz & Parker, 2023).

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 95% of Americans report having about five hours of leisure time per weekday, but much of that is spent on passive activities like watching television (BLS, 2023). Only a small portion is dedicated to socializing or engaging in restorative hobbies, which raises red flags for long-term well-being. Research by Sonnentag & Zijlstra (2006) underscores that recovery time is essential—without it, stress accumulates and can lead to serious health consequences.

Globally, the picture is just as complex. Data from the International Labor Organization shows that workers in Tanzania (54 hours/week), Bangladesh, Senegal, and Gambia all average over 50 hours of work per week, while countries like Iraq, Rwanda, and the Netherlands report some of the shortest workweeks, around 30–31 hours (World Population Review, 2023). These disparities reflect not just economic conditions, but also cultural values around productivity, rest, and social responsibility.

In Europe, extended vacations—especially during August shutdowns—are a cultural norm. In contrast, American companies are beginning to recognize the need for structured time off. For example, PricewaterhouseCoopers now enforces a 10-day winter break and a 5-day summer shutdown to ensure employees actually disconnect without guilt or peer pressure (Jones, 2022).

As the pace of work accelerates across the globe, the need for meaningful leisure and recovery time becomes not just a personal concern—but an organizational and cultural imperative. Whether it’s through intentional policies, national norms, or a deeper appreciation for human sustainability, the way we balance work and rest defines our long-term well-being. By recognizing the cultural variations and psychological impacts of overwork, organizations can move beyond productivity metrics to create healthier, more resilient environments where recovery is not a luxury, but a necessity.

Insider Edge

Helping Managers Respect Emotional Differences Without Bias

Objective: To help managers recognize that emotional responses differ across individuals and to avoid judging employee reactions through a biased lens—using emotional intelligence and inclusive communication strategies.

The Challenge

Managers often unintentionally dismiss or misjudge employee emotions based on their own standards of what’s “appropriate.” This can lead to invalidation, resentment, and disengagement. Emotional responses are shaped by culture, personality, lived experience, and communication style—not by a universal rulebook (Edelman & van Knippenberg, 2018; Goleman, 2007).

When managers fail to acknowledge this diversity, they risk reinforcing bias and undermining psychological safety.

Insider Edge Strategies

1. Build Emotional Intelligence

  • Develop self-awareness: Recognize your own emotional filters and triggers
  • Practice empathy: Ask, “What might this person be experiencing that I don’t see?”
  • Use emotional regulation: Respond calmly, not reactively

“Leaders with high emotional intelligence are better at interpreting and responding to diverse emotional cues, which enhances team trust and effectiveness.” — Edelman & van Knippenberg (2018)

2. Use Inclusive Communication

  • Avoid minimizing language: Replace “You’re overreacting” with “Help me understand what’s upsetting you.”
  • Validate emotions without judgment: Acknowledge the feeling even if you don’t share it
  • Encourage open dialogue: Create space for employees to express concerns safely

3. Recognize Cultural and Personality Differences

  • Understand that collectivist cultures may express emotion differently than individualist ones
  • Introverts may internalize stress, while extroverts may vocalize it
  • Avoid assuming uniform emotional norms across the team

4. Use Reflective Tools

  • Implement anonymous pulse surveys to gauge emotional climate
  • Use structured feedback tools to reduce subjective bias
  • Encourage journaling or self-assessment for employees to process emotions privately

5. Reframe What “Professionalism” Means

  • Professionalism doesn’t mean emotional suppression—it means emotional maturity
  • Redefine workplace norms to include emotional expression as part of healthy communication

Empowerment Tip

“Emotions are data—not disruptions. The best managers learn to read them, not silence them.” — Inspired by Goleman (2007) & Suladze (2025)

 

References

Edelman, P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Emotional intelligence, management of subordinate’s emotions, and leadership effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2018-0154

Goleman, D. (2007). Emotional intelligence (10th ed.). Bantam Books.

Suladze, T. (2025, March 31). The role of emotions in organizational change management. The European Business Review. https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/the-role-of-emotions-in-organizational-change-management/

Cunningham, G. B., & Cunningham, H. R. (2022). Bias among managers: Its prevalence across a decade and comparison across occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1034712. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1034712

Discussion Questions

  1. Reflect on a time when emotions guided someone toward a more ethical choice. How did their emotional response—such as empathy, guilt, or compassion—play a role in upholding ethical standards or standing up for what was right?
  2. Describe a situation where emotions may have clouded someone’s judgment, leading to less ethical behavior. Was it anger, fear, pressure, or something else that influenced their decision-making? What might have helped them regulate their response?
  3. Why do you think vacation policies vary so widely across different countries and cultures? In your view, does having less leisure time contribute to workplace stress or diminish well-being? Should organizations do more to support recovery?

Section 7.7: Spotlight

Edward Jones and the Communication of Resilience in Workplace Stress Management

Discussion Questions

  1. What are some other jobs that deal with relatively negative or unfavorable emotions daily?
  2. What type of personality might be better equipped for dealing with negative emotions at work?
  3. What are some ways you deal with negative emotions either at work or at school? Do your methods differ depending on what type of situation you are in?

Section 7.8: Conclusion

Stress poses a significant challenge for both individuals and organizations, often leading to exhaustion when sustained over time. To mitigate the adverse health and performance outcomes associated with chronic stress, a variety of strategies can be employed at both personal and organizational levels. Emotions are an integral part of organizational life, and developing a deeper understanding of them enables individuals to manage emotional experiences more effectively. While emotional labor—the effort required to regulate emotions in professional settings—can be psychologically demanding, emotional intelligence offers a valuable resource for coping with these demands and maintaining well-being in the workplace.

Section 7.9: Case Study and Exercises

Ethical Dilemma Case Study

Compassion Denied

Jasmine, a mid-level analyst at a financial services firm, recently received devastating news: her father passed away after a long illness. She had requested time off to visit him during his final days, but her manager denied the request, citing workload and policy constraints. Now grieving, Jasmine feels emotionally overwhelmed but fears disclosing her situation or requesting bereavement leave. Her manager has a reputation for emotional detachment and punitive responses to personal needs, creating a climate of fear and silence.

Jasmine faces a painful ethical crossroads:

  • Should she disclose her emotional state and request time off, risking retaliation or reputational damage?
  • Or should she suppress her grief to maintain professional standing, potentially compromising her mental health and job performance?

This situation raises critical questions about emotional labor, psychological safety, and ethical leadership in organizational communication.

Organizational Communication Insights

1. Emotional Labor and Suppression

Employees often feel compelled to hide emotions to meet workplace norms, especially in emotionally cold environments. This suppression can lead to burnout, disengagement, and long-term psychological harm (Grandey, 2000).

“When employees feel they must conceal emotions to meet organizational expectations, they experience emotional dissonance, which can erode well-being.” — Grandey (2000)

2. Psychological Safety and Managerial Empathy

A lack of psychological safety—where employees fear punishment for expressing vulnerability—undermines trust and communication (Edmondson, 1999). Managers who lack emotional intelligence may inadvertently foster toxic climates.

“Psychological safety enables employees to speak up, take risks, and express emotions without fear of negative consequences.” — Edmondson (1999)

3. Ethical Leadership and Organizational Culture

Ethical leaders model compassion and fairness, especially during personal crises. When leadership fails to support employees during emotionally significant events, it signals a misalignment between organizational values and human needs (Brown & Treviño, 2006).

Resolution Pathways

  • HR Intervention: Jasmine could confidentially approach HR to request bereavement leave and report the manager’s behavior.
  • Peer Support: Trusted colleagues may help Jasmine navigate the situation and advocate on her behalf.
  • Organizational Reform: The company should review its leave policies and train managers in emotional intelligence and ethical communication.

References

Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95

American Psychological Association. (2018). Work and well-being survey. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/supporting-employee-psychological-well-being

Individual Exercise

Stress and Emotions in the Workplace

Objective: To deepen your understanding of how stress and emotions influence workplace behavior, decision-making, and communication—through personal reflection and applied analysis.

Instructions

Complete the following three-part exercise using only your own experiences, observations, and course materials. Do not use AI tools, internet searches, or external assistance. This is a personal reflection and application task designed to help you internalize key concepts from organizational behavior.

Part 1: Personal Reflection (300–400 words)

Think about a time when you or someone you know experienced stress or strong emotions in a work, volunteer, or team setting (e.g., part-time job, group project, internship, campus organization).

Respond to the following prompts:

  • What triggered the stress or emotional response?
  • How did the individual express or manage their emotions?
  • How did others in the environment respond?
  • What were the short-term and long-term effects on performance, communication, or relationships?

Tip: Focus on describing the situation clearly and analyzing the emotional dynamics—not just the outcome.

Part 2: Concept Application (250–350 words)

Choose two concepts from your organizational behavior course related to stress or emotions (e.g., emotional labor, burnout, emotional intelligence, affective events theory, psychological safety).

For each concept:

  • Define it in your own words.
  • Explain how it applies to the situation you described in Part 1.
  • Reflect on how understanding this concept could have changed the outcome or improved the situation.

Tip: Use your textbook or lecture notes to guide your definitions and applications.

Part 3: Action Plan (200–300 words)

Imagine you are a team leader in a similar situation. Based on what you’ve learned:

  • What would you do differently to support someone experiencing stress or strong emotions?
  • What communication strategies would you use?
  • How would you balance empathy with professionalism?

Tip: Be specific. Think about tone, timing, and tools (e.g., check-ins, feedback, boundaries).

References

Afshar, K., Itani, O. S., Gabler, C. B., Kalra, A., & Agnihotri, R. (2025). The interplay of morality, emotional labor, and customer injustice: How salesperson experiences shape job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 124, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.11.014

AJHSSR. (2020). The effect of role ambiguity on work-related stress and employee satisfaction. AJHSSR PDF

Allen, K. (2025, July 3). The role of communications during business transformation: The critical success factor. Forbes Communications Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescommunicationscouncil/2025/07/03/the-role-of-communications-during-business-transformation-the-critical-success-factor

Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2020). A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 539–576.

Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630–640.

American Psychological Association. (2022). Stress in America: 2022 report. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress

American Psychological Association. (2023). Stress in America: 2023 report. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress

American Psychological Association. (2023, March 8). Stress effects on the body. https://www.apa.org/topics/stress/body

American Psychological Association. (2024). Coping with stress at work. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/work-stress

American Psychological Association. (2024). Toxic workplaces leave employees sick, scared, and looking for an exit. APA article

American Psychological Association. (2024, October 22). Coping with stress at work. https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/work-stress

American Psychological Association. (2025). The experience of working in America during times of change. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/work-in-america/2025/full-report-working-times-change

American Psychological Association. (2025, May 21). More than half of U.S. workers say job insecurity causing stress. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2025/05/job-insecurity-causing-stress

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Eustress. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved from [17]

Araya-Fischel, X. (2025, May 20). Why psychological safety drives performance in high-stakes industries. Forbes.

Aslan, M., Sönmez, S., & Deniz, M. (2025). Leadership styles and work stress: The role of workplace climate and feelings of entrapment. Current Psychology, 44, 6407–6420. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-025-07656-8

AT&T Inc. (2004). Telecommuting trends and practices. Internal corporate report.

Barnett, R. C., & Hall, D. T. (2001). How to use work-family policies to boost employee commitment and productivity. Harvard Business Review.

Barry, D. (2024, October 10). Information overload is bad for your health. Here’s what you can do. Reworked

Barsade, S. G., Coutifaris, C. G., & Pillemer, J. (2018). Emotional contagion in organizational life. Wharton Faculty Research. https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/…

Bauer, T. N., et al. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational entry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707–721.

Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). Information overload: An overview. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1031–1054.

Beamible. (2025). Role conflict: Examples and types. Beamible article

Bohnet, I., & Chilazi, S. (2025). Moments that matter: How to bake fairness into the workplace. Harvard Kennedy School PolicyCast.

Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008

Bornstein, J. (2023, June 5). How a lack of clear expectations leaves employees anxious and adrift. Forbes Coaches Council.

Cannon, W. B. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. D. Appleton & Company.

Cao, S., & Cao, N. (2025). Emotion-aware design: Modulating valence, arousal, and dominance in communication via design. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16038

Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.

Cásedas, L., Schooler, J. W., Vadillo, M. A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2024). An integrative framework for the mechanisms underlying mindfulness-induced cognitive change. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3(12), 821–834.

Castrillon, C. (2025, April 21). Why more employers offer paid sabbaticals to combat burnout. Forbes.

Catalyst. (2013). Unwritten rules in the workplace. https://www.tempomilwaukee.org/assets/documents/travis%20dnika%20-%20unwritten%20rules_final.pdf

CDC. (2024, February 13). About stress at work. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/stress/about/index.html

Chadderdon, L. (2008). Telecommuting at Merrill Lynch: A case study. BusinessWeek, March issue.

Chattha, Q. S. (2023, August 20). Impacts of cognitive dissonance in the workplace and how to deal with it. HSE Blog. https://www.hseblog.com/cognitive-dissonance-in-the-workplace/

Chen, H., Jin, J., Sun, S., Zhang, C., & Yu, M. (2025). Research on propagation dynamics of emotional contagion using S3EIR model based on multiple social media platforms. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1582974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1582974

Cheng, P., Zhou, L., Liu, T., & Ge, N. (2025). Empowering leadership and frontline employees’ emotional labor: The mediation effects of job passion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1437736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1437736

Clarke, L. (2022). Work-related stress, anxiety or depression statistics in Great Britain. Health and Safety Executive. https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/stress.pdf

Clarkson, B. G., Wagstaff, C. R. D., Arthur, C. A., & Thelwell, R. C. (2024). Measuring emotional contagion as a multidimensional construct. The Journal of Social Psychology, 165(3), 330–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2348486

Clinton, M. E., & Conway, N. (2024). Within-person increases in job autonomy linked to greater employee strain. Work & Stress, 39(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2024.2364593

Cole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945

Cote, C. (2025, May 20). How to build psychological safety in the workplace. Harvard Business School Online.

CPH-NEW. (2024). Job stress health effects. University of Massachusetts Lowell. https://www.uml.edu/Research/CPH-NEW/Worker/stress-at-work/health-effects.aspx

Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., & Byrne, Z. S. (2003). The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 160–169.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Dalla-Camina, M. (2025, June 5). The emotional labor tax: Naming the invisible work women carry. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/real-women/202506/the-emotional-labor-tax-naming-the-invisible-work-women-carry

Das, S. (2025, July 9). Top 10 benefits of voice-based AI assistants in 2025. INORU. https://www.inoru.com/blog/top-10-benefits-voice-based-ai-assistants-2025

Davey, L. (2025). Diagnosing a toxic team. Liane Davey guide

Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. SUNY Press.

DiDonna, D. (2025, February 4). When employees take sabbaticals, organizations benefit. Harvard Business Review.

Dispatches from the war on stress. (2007). Fortune, 155(1), 48–56.

Dollins, M. (2025, July 21). The 2025 AI landscape: What communicators need to know now. Forbes Communications Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescommunicationscouncil/2025/07/21/the-2025-ai-landscape-what-communicators-need-to-know-now/

Duncan, R. D. (2025, July 17). Psychological safety: Take a risk with no penalty or punishment. Forbes.

Dyer, K. A. (2006). The anatomy of stress. Psychology Today.

Eatough, E. M., et al. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619–632.

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

EdStellar. (2025). 11 strategies to handle intergenerational conflict at work. https://www.edstellar.com/blog/intergenerational-conflict-management-strategies

Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203

Eliadis, A. (2025, June 20). Emotions at work: Why regulation, not repression, builds stronger teams. Forbes Coaches Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/06/20/emotions-at-work-why-regulation-not-repression-builds-stronger-teams/

Emergenetics. (2024). 12 warning signs of poor collaboration. Emergenetics blog

Ferguson, A., Dinh-Williams, L.-A., & Segal, Z. (2021). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. In A. Wenzel (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy: Overview and approaches (pp. 595–615). American Psychological Association.

Fisher, C. D. (2002). Real-time affect at work: A neglected phenomenon in organizational behavior. Australian Journal of Management, 27(1_suppl), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620202701S01

Fontana, D. (1989). Managing stress. British Psychological Society.

Forbes. (2024). Unwritten workplace rules and miscommunication. Forbes article

Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007). Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 57–80.

Ford, P. (2024, December 30). Psychological safety at work: A 2025 guide for leaders. Edstellar.

Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M. W. (2020). Write down your team’s unwritten rules. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/tip/2020/11/document-your-teams-unwritten-rules

Franco, D. D. (2025, May 14). 5 ways to create psychological safety in the workplace. Meditopia for Work.

Franks, S. (2023). Distress vs Eustress: Critical Thinking Exercise. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from [16]

Frederickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431

Fripp, G. (2025). Understanding affective events theory. MyOrganisationalBehaviour.com. . https://www.myorganisationalbehaviour.com/affective-events-theory/

Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78.

FullTilt Team Development. (2024). Team building in toxic cultures. FullTilt blog

Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524

Ganster, D. C. (1986). Type A behavior and occupational stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 8(2), 61–75.

Gave, J. (2024, November 26). Top 5 emotional intelligence trends in 2025 leaders must master. The Metiss Group. https://www.themetissgroup.com/blog/top-5-emotional-intelligence-trends-in-2025

George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1996). The experience of work and turnover intentions: Interactive effects of value attainment, job satisfaction, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.318

Gilboa, S., et al. (2008). A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 227–271.

Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165

Goldenberg, A., & Gross, J. J. (2025). Digital emotion contagion. Harvard Business School Working Paper. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/digital_emotion_contagion_8f38bccf-c655-4f3b-a66d-0ac8c09adb2d.pdf

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95

Grandey, A. A., Fisk, G. M., & Steiner, D. D. (2005). Must “service with a smile” be stressful? The moderating role of personal control for American and French employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.893

Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress: Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.09.003

Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to workplace unfairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.58

Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.

Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.

Groppel, J. L., & Andelman, B. (2000). The corporate athlete: How to achieve peak performance in business and life. Wiley.

Gross, G. (2008). Federal telework: Progress and pitfalls. Government Technology, April issue.

Grossbart, T. A. (1992). Skin Deep: A Mind/Body Program for Healthy Skin. Health Press.

Gupta, S. (2023). Understanding communication styles and stress. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/workplace-communication-styles-how-to-improve-yours-and-navigate-others-7853338

Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1134

Hamilton, N. A., Catley, D., & Karlson, C. (2007). Sleep and the affective response to stress and pain. Health Psychology, 26(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.3.288

Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work–family conflict and work–related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(3), 419–436.

Hammer, L. B., et al. (2024). Workplace conditions and mental health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(5), 421–438.

Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A. (2007). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(07)28002-4

Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press.

Hobson, C. J., Delunas, L., & Kesic, D. (2001). Compelling evidence of the need for corporate work/life balance initiatives: Results from a national survey of stressful life-events. Journal of Employment Counseling, 38(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2001.tb00491.x

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.

Horowitz, J. M., & Parker, K. (2023, March 30). How Americans view their jobs. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/03/ST_2023.03.30_Culture-of-Work_Report.pdf

Hu, T., Zhang, L., Ma, S., & Wang, J. (2025). Surface acting unveiled: Exploring the multifaceted pathways to workplace incivility and the dark side of mindfulness. Current Psychology, 44, 2705–2721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07322-z

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/256741

Hutchens, K. (2025). Recognizing and addressing toxic and misaligned leadership. Executive Support Magazine. https://executivesupportmagazine.com/recognizing-and-addressing-toxic-and-misaligned-leadership/

Ilies, R., Wagner, D. T., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Explaining affective linkages in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1140

Inclusion Geeks. (2024). Generational differences or miscommunication? https://www.inclusiongeeks.com/articles/generational-differences-or-miscommunication-whats-really-driving-workplace-tensions

Inclusion Geeks. (2024). Team dynamics under pressure. Inclusion Geeks article

Institute of Internal Communication. (2025). Change and transformation: Communication strategies for organizational resilience. https://www.ioic.org.uk/knowledge-hub/find-resources-by-topic/change-and-transformation.html

Interview Guys. (2025, May 25). The state of workplace burnout in 2025: A comprehensive research report. https://blog.theinterviewguys.com/workplace-burnout-in-2025-research-report/

Jablin, F. M. (1987). Organizational entry, assimilation, and exit. In F. M. Jablin et al. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 679–740). Sage.

Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90020-2

Jones, T. (2022, May 10). Why flats dominate Spain’s housing market. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200506-why-do-flats-dominate-spains-housing-market

Jordan, P. J., Lawrence, S. A., & Troth, A. C. (2006). Emotions and coping with conflict: An introduction. Journal of Management & Organization, 12(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200004013

Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.395

Kaiser, F. (2018). Understanding stress in communication management: How it limits effectiveness. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/61136

Kalimo, R., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). The effects of past and anticipated downsizing on survivor well-being: An equity perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(2), 91–109.

Kelly, E. L., Moen, P., & Oakes, J. M. (2014). Changing work and work–family conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 485–516.

Kelly, J. (2023). Layoffs are harming the mental health of workers. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2023/02/07/layoffs-are-harming-the-mental-health-of-workers-making-them-feel-vulnerable-and-disposable/

Kirby, L. (2001). Personality, physiology and performance: The effects of optimism on task engagement. University of Pennsylvania, Positive Psychology Center.

Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139–149.

Kossek, E. E., Lautschb, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002

Landsburg, S. E. (2006). The armchair economist: Economics and everyday life (Rev. ed.). Free Press.

Law, K. S., Wong, C.-S., & Song, L. J. (2004). The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.483

Lee, M. K., et al. (2019). Role ambiguity and burnout among psychotherapists: A meta-analysis. Counseling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(1), 164–172.

Lee, S. (2025). Mastering stress in the workplace: Effective strategies for organizational communication success. Number Analytics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/stress-management-in-organizational-communication

Lee, S. (2025). Motivation in ethics and labor. Number Analytics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/motivation-in-ethics-and-labor

LeggUP. (2024). The science of workplace stress and its impact on productivity. https://www.leggup.com/articles/the-science-of-workplace-stress-and-its-impact-on-productivity

Linder, J. N., & Mancini, J. A. (2021). Observations on the relationship between resilience and mindfulness. Counseling and Family Therapy Scholarship Review, 3(2), Article 1.

Lipman, V. (2024, May 20). How reorganizations can harm a workforce. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-of-the-manager/202405/how-reorganizations-can-harm-a-workforce

Liu, H., Zhang, D., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Emotions spread like contagious diseases. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1493512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1493512

López Bohle, S., et al. (2016). Layoffs and employee engagement. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(20), 2840–2861.

LumApps. (2025). Work-family conflict: Causes, impact, and solutions. https://www.lumapps.com/insights/blog/work-family-conflict

LumApps. (2025, July 10). Information overload: Causes, impact, and solutions for the workplace. LumApps Blog

Marsh, E., et al. (2024). Overloaded by information or worried about missing out on it. Digital Work Research.

Mayo Clinic Staff. (2008). Stress and depression: Is there a link? Mayo Clinic.

Mayo Clinic Staff. (2008). Stress and job performance. Mayo Clinic.

McKinsey & Company. (2025). AI in the workplace: Empowering people to unlock AI’s full potential. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/superagency-in-the-workplace-empowering-people-to-unlock-ais-full-potential-at-work

Medaris, A. (2025). Work is reaching a boiling point. Monitor on Psychology, 56(1), 62. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2025/01/trends-workplace-tensions

Michalec, B., Forbes, C. E., Pardon, K., et al. (2025). A scoping review of emotional contagion research with human subjects. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1573375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1573375

Mikolajczak, M., & Luminet, O. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence and the cognitive appraisal of stressful events: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.001

Mind Share Partners & Qualtrics. (2025). 2025 Mental Health at Work Report. https://www.mindsharepartners.org/2025-mental-health-at-work-report

Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41–51.

Moementum. (2025). How to align a dysfunctional leadership team (without firing everyone). https://moementum.com/how-to-align-a-dysfunctional-leadership-team-without-firing-everyone/

Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Greenberg, E. (2004). Surviving organizational downsizing: The roles of social support and control. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(1), 3–25.

MSN Health. (2025). Harnessing yoga to manage workplace stress. https://www.msn.com/en-in/health/other/harnessing-yoga-to-manage-workplace-stress-and-boost-performance/ar-AA1ILlDs

Murphy, K. (2025, March 3). Why career breaks are good for you, your employer and co-workers. RTÉ Brainstorm.

Myers, A. (2025, March 4). Workplace communication crisis? Business leaders are the answer. HR Daily Advisor. https://hrdailyadvisor.com/2025/03/04/workplace-communication-crisis-business-leaders-are-the-answer

Nasri, M. (2025). Towards intelligent VR training: A physiological adaptation framework for cognitive load and stress detection [arXiv:2504.06461]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06461

Nectar. (2025). Layoffs and employee morale survey.

Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410.

Nilsen, Y. (2023). Cultural alignment in organizations: Impact and strategies. Journal of Organizational Culture and Communication, 47(3), 105–121. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/cultural-alignment-in-organizations-impact-and-strategies.pdf

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.

O’Brien, T. B., & DeLongis, A. (1996). The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 775–813.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2024). Workplace stress overview. https://www.osha.gov/workplace-stress

O’Loughlin, A. (2023). Sabbatical programs in corporate America. HR Digest, March issue.

Pageon.ai. . (2025). Top AI-powered voice assistants you should know in 2025. https://www.pageon.ai/blog/ai-powered-voice-assistants

Papousek, I., Freudenthaler, H. H., & Schulter, G. (2008). The interplay of perceiving and regulating emotions in becoming infected with positive and negative moods. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 463–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.021

Parra Vargas, E., Carrasco-Ribelles, L. A., Marin-Morales, J., Ayuso Molina, C., & Alcañiz Raya, M. (2024). Feasibility of virtual reality and machine learning to assess personality traits in an organizational environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1342018

Pew Research Center. (2023). Workplace stress and generational differences. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/03/15/workplace-stress-and-generational-differences/

Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press.

Pfeffer, J., & Veiga, J. F. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899547

Pham, E. (2024, September 17). Workplace stress: Causes, impacts and solutions. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2024/09/17/workplace-stress-causes-impacts-and-solutions/

Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454.

Popucza, T. Z., Eriksson, L., & Eriksson, M. (2025). Emotional demands, burnout, and mental well-being in healthcare, care, and service work: The mediating role of surface acting across age. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 3, Article 1628713. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1628713

Probst, T. M., Gailey, N. J., Jiang, L., & Bohle, S. A. (2007). Job insecurity and workplace safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 345–356.

Psychology Today. (2025). Workplace dynamics and employee well-being. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/workplace-dynamics

Psychreg. (2025, June 7). Understanding stress: Physiological and psychological. https://www.psychreg.org/understanding-stress-physiological-psychological/

Pugh, S. D. (2001). Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069445

Pulivarthi Group. (2025). Addressing workplace stress across generations. https://pulivarthigroup.com/blogs/addressing-workplace-stress-across-generations

Queiroz, A. C. M., Thille, C., & Stanford Accelerator for Learning. (2025). Self-review and feedback in virtual reality dialogues increase language markers of personal and emotional expression in an empathetic communication training experience. Computers & Education: X Reality. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100108

Quick, J. C., et al. (1997). Organizational demands and stressors. In Preventive stress management in organizations (pp. 21–40). APA. APA PsycNet

Quick, J. C., et al. (1997). Preventive stress management in organizations. American Psychological Association.

Reward Gateway. (2025). Workplace wellbeing in 2025 [PDF report]. https://www.rewardgateway.com/hubfs/09-us-reports/2025_us_workplace-wellbeing-report.pdf

Richardson, K., & Klein, A. (2021). Workforce trends and overtime escalation. ADPI Research Institute.

Robinson, B. (2024, March 22). Employees say unwritten workplace rules cause miscommunication and disconnection. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2024/03/22/employees-say-unwritten-workplace-rules-cause-miscommunication-and-disconnection-analysis-finds/

Rosekind, M. R., Gregory, K. B., Mallis, M. M., Brandt, S. L., Seal, B., & Lerner, D. (2010). The cost of poor sleep: Workplace productivity loss and associated costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181c78c30

Sammer, J. (2022). Sabbaticals: A growing trend in employee benefits. Society for Human Resource Management.

Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.

Sauter, S. L., Murphy, L. R., & Hurrell, J. J. (1990). Prevention of work-related psychological disorders: A national strategy proposed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). American Psychologist, 45(10), 1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.10.1146

Sayre, G. M., Chi, N.-W., & Grandey, A. A. (2025). Surface acting loss spirals: Getting unstuck with recovery activities. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2859

Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Xie, J. L. (2000). Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.512

Schmidt, S., et al. (2014). Uncertainty in the workplace: Role ambiguity and conflict. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(4), 91–109.

Schor, J. B. (1992). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. Basic Books.

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. McGraw-Hill.

Selye, H. (1976). Stress in health and disease. Butterworths.

Shah, B. (2023). Work stress and employee performance: Analysis of work. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(4), 1–12. https://ijip.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/18.01.031.20231104.pdf

Shehab, A. (2025, March 19). The rise of job insecurity: Handling layoff fears. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-algorithm/202503/the-rise-of-job-insecurity-handling-layoff-fears

Shockley, K. M., & Singla, N. (2011). Reconsidering work–family interactions: A meta-analysis of the reciprocal relationships between work–family conflict and job and life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 25–38.

Short, R. (2024). When stated values and lived culture don’t match. Workplace Peace Institute. https://www.workplacepeaceinstitute.com/post/when-stated-values-and-lived-culture-don-t-match-navigating-values-misalignment-at-work

Shrivastava, R. (2022). A study on impact of leadership styles on employee’s work stress and wellbeing. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 24(3), 24–34. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol24-issue3/Ser-3/B2403032434.pdf

Sikora, P., Moore, S., & Greenberg, E. (2008). Downsizing and alcohol use: A longitudinal study of U.S. workers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 1–13.

Sippio. (2025). The future of voice in 2025: Predictions and innovations. https://www.sippio.io/blog/the-future-of-voice-in-2025-predictions-and-innovations

Sloan Management Review. (2022). Toxic culture is driving the Great Resignation. MIT Sloan article

Slocum, J. W., et al. (1999). Downsizing and organizational performance. U.S. Department of Labor.

Sonnentag, S., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2006). After work is done: Psychological perspectives on recovery from work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500513855

Speakap. (2025, April 10). Avoiding information overload: A step-by-step guide. Speakap Insights

Spector, P. E., & O’Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the prediction of job stress symptoms. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 67(1), 1–11.

Stewart, J. (2023). Drowsy driving fatalities. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved from NHTSA’s official report

Sutton, J. (2025). 16 causes of workplace stress and how to prevent its effects. Positive Psychology. https://positivepsychology.com/workplace-stress/

Talkspace. (2024). The negative effects of stress in the workplace. https://business.talkspace.com/articles/the-negative-effects-of-stress-in-the-workplace

Tang, W.-G., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Role overload and work performance: The role of psychological strain and leader–member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 691207. Frontiers article

Tarafdar, M., & Stich, J.-F. (2021). Virtual work, technology and wellbeing. In T. Wall, C. L. Cooper, & P. Brough (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational wellbeing (pp. 159–171). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529757187.n11

Team DILAN. (2025, January 31). Why leaders must master emotional intelligence in 2025. DILAN Consulting. https://dilanconsulting.com/why-leaders-must-master-emotional-intelligence-in-2025

Together Platform. (2023, December 5). 6 ways to avoid digital overload and keep employees engaged. Together Blog

Travis, D. J. (2013). Catalyst studies on unwritten rules to advancement. Catalyst Research Center for Corporate Practice.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Teleworking trends in the private sector: 2021–2022. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/telework.pdf

Umbra, R., & Fasbender, U. (2025). The daily relations between workplace anger, coping strategies, work outcomes, and workplace affiliation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1538914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1538914

Van Yperen, N. W., & Hagedoorn, M. (2003). Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040627

Webber, A. M. (1998). Danger: Toxic company. Fast Company, 14, 152.

Weisinger, H. (1998). Emotional intelligence at work: The untapped edge for success. Jossey-Bass.

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.

Welbourne, T. M., & Andrews, A. O. (1996). Predicting performance of initial public offering firms: Should HRM be in the equation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 891–919. https://doi.org/10.5465/256717

Weler, K. (2008). Emotion and product experience: Understanding loyalty through affective response.

Widmer, J. (1993). Occupational stress and role overload. Human Resource Management Journal, 3(1), 45–58.

Wilcox, L. (2025, January 9). Future of work: Emotional intelligence is your greatest competitive leadership advantage. Forbes Coaches Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbescoachescouncil/2025/01/09/future-of-work-emotional-intelligence-is-your-greatest-competitive-leadership-advantage

Williamson, T. (2025). Understanding stress and mental health. Psychreg.

Wisenfeld, B. M., Brockner, J., & Martin, C. (2001). How to make layoffs less damaging: The role of self-affirmation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1–23.

Workhuman. (2024). Unwritten rules and employee trust.

WorkLife Digital. (2025, May 2). The critical role of autonomy in workplace wellbeing.

Workplace Mental Health. (2024). Workplace stress and mental health. https://workplacementalhealth.org/Mental-Health-Topics/Workplace-Stress

Workplace Strategies for Mental Health. (2024). Coping with change. https://www.workplacestrategiesformentalhealth.com/resources/coping-with-change

World Population Review. (2023). Countries with the longest work weeks. Retrieved March 27, 2025, from https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/longest-work-weeks

Woxday. (2025). Navigating the digital deluge: Strategies to combat communication overload. Woxday Blog

Wurtman, R. J., & Wurtman, J. J. (1988). Do carbohydrates affect food intake via neurotransmitter activity? Appetite, 11(Suppl 1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(88)80045-X

YAROOMS. (2022, May 24). Tackling communication overload in the digital workplace. YAROOMS Blog

Yoo, W. S., Park, J., & Back, K.-J. (2025). Editorial: Analysing emotional labor in the service industries: Consumer and business perspectives, Volume II. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1600934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600934

Zapf, D. (2006). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.001

Zurnamer, G. (2025). Styles of communications: The ultimate workplace guide. Vouch. https://vouchfor.com/blog/styles-of-communications-workplace-guide

    Media Attributions

    • 4957465295_43e0e86cd4_w

    License

    Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

    THRIVE 2025: Teamwork, Harmony, Resilience, Innovation, Vision, & Empathy: Organizational Communication Open Text Copyright © 2025 / 2023 / 2017 / 2010 by [Author removed at request of original publisher] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.