Chapter 8: Communication
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
- Describe the key components of the communication process and explain how they interact.
- Analyze and differentiate between various types of communication (e.g., verbal, nonverbal, written, visual).
- Evaluate the effectiveness of different communication channels in organizational contexts.
- Identify common barriers to effective communication and develop strategies to overcome them.
- Explain the importance of active listening and demonstrate techniques that enhance listening effectiveness.
- Assess how ethical considerations influence both the delivery and interpretation of messages in the workplace.
- Interpret how verbal and nonverbal cues may carry different meanings across cultures and design communication strategies that promote intercultural understanding.
Section 8.1: Spotlight
Communication Breakdown During St. Louis’s Spring 2025 Snow and Ice Response
In early 2025, a prolonged winter storm left residential streets and sidewalks in St. Louis dangerously coated in ice and snow. Residents across neighborhoods—especially in Tower Grove South and Botanical Heights—reported inaccessible roads, delayed trash pickup, and limited city response for over a week. The situation drew criticism not just for the operational delays, but for the communication failures that amplified public frustration. The organizational communication process lacked clarity and cohesion, with residents unsure of priorities, timelines, and available resources (City of St. Louis, 2025).
The city’s use of communication channels was fragmented and inadequate. While general updates appeared on the official city website and occasional press releases, social media posts were sporadic, and there was little effort to communicate through traditional methods like radio or printed notices for digitally disconnected populations. The city’s snow route maps and tiered plans were neither clearly communicated nor referenced in public messaging, making it difficult for residents to understand city priorities or monitor progress (FOX2Now, 2025; Spectrum News, 2025).
Several barriers to effective communication emerged, including unclear budgeting decisions and staffing shortages within the Streets Department. For example, reallocations from snow removal to pothole maintenance were not explained to the public until after widespread concern had surfaced (St. Louis Public Radio, 2025). This reactive rather than proactive communication fueled public mistrust. Additionally, the absence of multilingual updates and ADA-accessible formats revealed shortcomings in inclusive communication design.
The role of listening was largely absent throughout the snow response. Unlike scenarios involving robust community engagement, the city did not seek real-time feedback or consult neighborhood leaders during the early stages of the crisis. As a result, residents in underserved communities resorted to funding private plow services—highlighting a breakdown in institutional responsiveness and dialogue (St. Louis Public Radio, 2025). The lack of feedback mechanisms such as online surveys, public hotlines, or virtual town halls further hampered organizational adaptability.
Ethically, the city’s messaging was seen as uninspired and insensitive. Public statements focused on staffing constraints rather than the lived impact of icy conditions, contributing to a perception of indifference. Verbal messages lacked empathy, and nonverbal communication—including the absence of city vehicles and officials in affected areas—reinforced the notion that residential neighborhoods were a lower priority. This disconnect between leadership and constituents strained public confidence during an already precarious situation (FOX2Now, 2025).
In summary, the City of St. Louis’s 2025 snow and ice response underscores the importance of strategic, inclusive, and empathetic organizational communication in municipal operations. Aligning logistical execution with transparent and responsive messaging is critical—not only for managing crises effectively but also for sustaining public trust.
References
City of St. Louis. (2025). Snow and ice response and maintenance. https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/street/street-division/snow-ice/index.cfm
FOX2Now. (2025, January 13). Some St. Louis neighborhoods left icy and unplowed. https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/some-st-louis-neighborhoods-left-icy-and-unplowed/
Spectrum News. (2025, February 5). St. Louis County’s snow response struggled due to volume, lack of experienced staff. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/mo/st-louis/news/2025/02/05/st-louis-county-transportation-public-works-snow-removal
St. Louis Public Radio. (2025, January 14). Lack of staff and equipment held up St. Louis area snow removal. https://www.stlpr.org/government-politics-issues/2025-01-14/modot-st-louis-lack-of-staff-equipment-streets-unplowed
Discussion Questions
- The City of St. Louis used inconsistent communication channels during the snow and ice response. How could the city have better utilized diverse communication methods to ensure all residents—especially those without internet access or with language barriers—received timely and actionable information?
- Staffing shortages and budget reallocations were cited as barriers to the city’s snow removal efforts. How could proactive communication about these challenges have mitigated public frustration? What strategies can organizations use to address barriers transparently without eroding trust?
- Residents resorted to crowdfunding private plow services due to a lack of institutional support. What does this suggest about the city’s listening practices during the crisis? How can organizations create feedback loops to better respond to community needs in real time?
- The city’s messaging was criticized for being impersonal and overly focused on logistical constraints. How does the tone and content of communication impact public trust during a crisis? What ethical considerations should leaders prioritize when crafting messages in high-stakes situations?
- The absence of visible leadership in affected neighborhoods was perceived as a lack of prioritization. How do nonverbal cues, such as physical presence and visible action, influence public perception of organizational commitment during a crisis?
Section 8.2: Understanding Communication
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
- Identify and explain the key components of communication, including the sender, message, medium, receiver, and feedback.
- Analyze the communication process by recognizing potential breakdowns and obstacles such as miscommunication, noise, and ineffective messaging.
The Communication Process
Communication is the lifeblood of organizational functioning—it enables coordination, fosters collaboration, and drives goal achievement. Defined by Merriam-Webster as the exchange of information through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior, communication permeates every level of organizational life. Research consistently shows that managers spend between 50% and 90% of their time communicating (Schnake et al., 1990), and their communication competence is directly linked to performance outcomes (Penley et al., 1991). While miscommunication in typical work settings may result in delays or interpersonal tension, in high-stakes environments such as operating rooms or aviation, it can have life-or-death consequences.
The prevalence and impact of miscommunication are well documented. CRICO Strategies found that communication failures contributed to 30% of 23,000 medical malpractice claims between 2009 and 2013, resulting in 1,744 deaths and $1.7 billion in costs (Budryk, 2016). Moreover, communication style—not just clinical outcomes—can influence litigation risk. A seminal study revealed that physicians with warmer, more personal communication styles were less likely to be sued, even when outcomes were poor (USA Today, 1997). These findings underscore the critical role of interpersonal communication in shaping perceptions and mitigating conflict.
In the business realm, poor communication is a costly liability. According to a 2022 study by The Harris Poll and Grammarly, ineffective communication leads to an average loss of 7.47 hours per employee per week—equating to approximately $12,506 annually per employee (BusinessWire, 2022). Conversely, strong communication skills are highly valued by employers. The National Association of Colleges and Employers (2023) reported that over 60% of employers seek candidates who are collaborative problem-solvers, and 50% prioritize written communication skills. Internally, organizations that keep employees informed and provide access to necessary information see higher levels of job satisfaction (What are the bottom line…, 2003).
Effective internal communication also correlates with financial performance. Meisinger (2003) emphasized that satisfied employees, empowered by transparent communication, are better positioned to serve customers effectively. Supporting this, research shows that improvements in communication integrity can boost market value by up to 7% (Meisinger, 2003). Grensing-Pophal (2006), analyzing data from Watson Wyatt, found that significant enhancements in internal communication quality were associated with a 29.5% increase in market value (Wolf, 2022). These findings illustrate that communication is not merely a soft skill—it is a strategic asset with tangible organizational benefits.
Discussion Questions
- Think of a time when communication broke down in your life—at work, school, or home. What part of the process went wrong? Was the message unclear, the medium ineffective, or the decoding influenced by personal factors?
- How might miscommunication contribute to errors or safety issues in the workplace? Consider industries like healthcare, hospitality, or construction—how could a misunderstood message lead to serious consequences?
- Can you describe an example of “noise” you’ve experienced during a conversation or message exchange? Was it physical (like distractions or background noise), psychological (like stress or assumptions), or semantic (confusing language or jargon)?
Section 8.3: What Gets in the Way: Communication Barriers and Listening Skills
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
- Identify common barriers that disrupt the communication process, including distractions, biased language, emotional filters, and selective perception.
- Evaluate the impact of poor listening habits on interpersonal and workplace communication, and recognize behaviors that undermine mutual understanding.
- Define active listening and its core components, including attention, empathy, nonverbal engagement, and message confirmation.
- Apply practical strategies to strengthen listening effectiveness, such as paraphrasing, silence for reflection, observation of emotional cues, and asking clarifying questions.
7 Barriers to Effective Communication
In any organization, communication is the lifeblood of collaboration, decision-making, and productivity. Yet despite its central role, communication is often disrupted by a range of barriers that distort meaning, hinder understanding, and reduce efficiency. These barriers can be subtle or overt, and they frequently arise from psychological, semantic, or structural factors within the workplace.
Among the most commonly cited obstacles are filtering, where information is selectively presented to shape perceptions; selective perception, which causes individuals to interpret messages through personal biases; and information overload, which overwhelms the receiver’s ability to process messages effectively (Robbins & Judge, 2017). Emotional states can also interfere, leading to emotional disconnects that block empathy and clarity (Clampitt, 2010). Additionally, lack of source familiarity or credibility can erode trust in the message, while workplace gossip—though informal and widespread—can distort facts and fuel misinformation (Daft, 2016). Finally, semantic barriers, such as jargon or ambiguous language, often result in misinterpretation and confusion (Guffey & Loewy, 2022).
Understanding these barriers is essential for improving communication outcomes. By identifying what gets in the way, organizations can take proactive steps to foster transparency, build trust, and enhance listening skills—ultimately creating a more connected and effective workplace.
1. Filtering: A Barrier to Clear Communication
Filtering refers to the intentional distortion or omission of information to influence how a message is received. This often occurs when individuals aim to manage others’ reactions—especially in hierarchical settings. For example, a manager may withhold negative sales data from a superior, or a gatekeeper may selectively pass along messages to protect reputational interests (Robbins & Judge, 2017). Even the receiver may unconsciously filter by deleting or ignoring messages that seem unpleasant or threatening.
This behavior is particularly common in upward communication, where employees may fear repercussions for sharing bad news. As Clampitt (2010) notes, filtering can prevent organizations from seeing the full picture, leading to poor decision-making and reduced transparency. To counteract this, leaders should encourage open dialogue and reward honesty, even when the message is unfavorable.
Individuals may decide to filter based on several factors:
- Past experience: Whether previous messengers were rewarded or punished.
- Perception of the receiver: If the superior has signaled that bad news is unwelcome.
- Emotional state and confidence: Fear, stress, or lack of expertise may inhibit full disclosure.
- Attention and involvement: Personal distractions or disengagement can distort message evaluation.
Ultimately, filtering contributes to miscommunication and fragmented understanding. As Alessandra (1993) observed, each listener reconstructs a message through their own lens, often creating a version that diverges from the original intent.
2. Selective Perception: Seeing What We Expect to See
Selective perception is the unconscious process of filtering information based on personal needs, experiences, and expectations. In a world saturated with stimuli, individuals naturally prioritize what they notice and how they interpret it. This mental shortcut helps us navigate complexity—but it can also distort communication and lead to misunderstandings (Langton, Robbins, & Judge, 2009).
For example, when visiting a new workplace, small details may stand out. Over time, however, we begin to assume patterns based on prior experiences. These assumptions shape how we interpret messages. In organizational settings, this can be problematic. Consider the case of Bill and his manager: Bill, overwhelmed by a demanding to-do list, assumed a toner request could wait. His manager, believing her urgency was clear, expected immediate action. Both relied on selective perception—and the result was miscommunication.
This bias is especially potent when emotional discomfort or prior beliefs are involved. People may ignore information that contradicts their worldview or focus intensely on details that confirm it (Smith, 2015). In workplace communication, this can manifest as perceptual defense or hyper-vigilance, depending on the context.
To reduce the impact of selective perception, organizations can:
- Encourage diverse perspectives in decision-making.
- Promote feedback loops to clarify intent.
- Train employees in active listening and empathy.
By recognizing this barrier, communicators can take steps to ensure messages are received as intended—rather than filtered through assumptions.
3. Information Overload: When Communication Becomes Too Much
In today’s hyper-connected world, individuals are bombarded with messages from every direction—professional emails, team chats, social media notifications, advertisements, and personal conversations. This constant stream of input can quickly exceed our ability to process it all, leading to a state known as information overload.
Information overload occurs when the volume and complexity of incoming information surpass an individual’s cognitive capacity to absorb and respond (Schick, Gordon, & Haka, 1990). It’s not just about quantity—it’s about the mismatch between what we’re expected to process and the time or mental bandwidth available to do so. In organizational settings, this imbalance can lead to missed messages, delayed decisions, and increased stress.
Recent research highlights the growing scale of the problem. A Gartner survey of nearly 1,000 employees and managers found that 38% of employees feel overwhelmed by excessive communication, while only 13% reported receiving less information in 2022 than the previous year (Klein, Earl, & Cundick, 2023). The proliferation of digital platforms—email, messaging apps, intranets, and productivity tools—has created a maze of channels that employees must navigate daily, often with little guidance or prioritization.
Information overload is more than a nuisance—it’s a strategic risk. It contributes to disengagement, poor decision-making, and reduced productivity (Arnold, Goldschmitt, & Rigotti, 2023). Fragmented workflows and constant interruptions diminish creativity and mental acuity, making it harder for employees to focus on meaningful tasks (Overholt, 2001). Even well-intentioned communication can become noise when it lacks relevance or clarity.
To combat this, organizations are rethinking how they communicate. Strategies include streamlining channels, tailoring messages to specific audiences, and fostering a culture of clarity and intentionality (Earl, 2025). Leaders are also encouraged to audit their communication practices and invest in training that promotes digital literacy and message prioritization.
In short, more communication isn’t always better. The key is to ensure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time—without overwhelming them in the process.
4. Emotional Disconnects: When Feelings Get in the Way of Clarity
Effective communication requires a balance between emotional awareness and clarity of thought from both the sender and the receiver. When emotions run high, this balance is disrupted, leading to emotional disconnects that hinder understanding and collaboration. A sender who is experiencing intense emotions, such as anger or stress, may struggle to articulate ideas effectively, while a receiver in a similarly unsettled state might misinterpret, distort, or even disregard the intended message. This misalignment is especially common in high-stakes or high-stress environments, where emotional regulation may falter and communication deteriorates. Emotional barriers can prevent people from listening with openness and empathy or expressing themselves with precision. In workplaces characterized by pressure and diversity, these disconnects often lead to reduced transparency, misalignment of goals, and disengagement among teams (Ganapathi, 2024). Strategies such as pausing before responding, using “I” statements to convey feelings constructively, and promoting psychological safety can help mitigate these challenges. By creating space for emotional regulation and encouraging active listening, organizations can foster deeper understanding and more effective communication.
5. Lack of Source Familiarity or Credibility / Misperceptions
Communication is not just about the message—it’s also about the messenger. When the sender lacks credibility or familiarity, the receiver may question the intent, tone, or accuracy of the message, leading to misperceptions and communication breakdowns. Humor, sarcasm, and irony are particularly vulnerable to misinterpretation in professional settings, especially when delivered through low-context channels like email. Without shared context or a history of trust, even a lighthearted comment can be perceived as offensive or inappropriate. For instance, a sarcastic remark from a colleague known for exaggeration may be taken literally by someone unfamiliar with their communication style, resulting in confusion or offense. Moreover, if a sender has previously shared inaccurate information or created false alarms, their current messages may be filtered or dismissed entirely. This erosion of trust can significantly impair organizational communication, as receivers become skeptical of the sender’s motives or reliability. As noted by Cragun (2020), source credibility is a critical factor in message acceptance, and misperceptions often arise when emotional tone, context, or sender reputation are unclear. To foster effective communication, organizations must promote transparency, consistency, and relationship-building, ensuring that messages are not only clear but also trusted.
6. Workplace Gossip
Workplace gossip, often referred to as the grapevine, is an informal communication network that plays a significant role in organizational life. While managers may view it as a barrier to effective communication, employees frequently rely on it as a trusted source of information. Research suggests that up to 70% of organizational communication occurs through informal channels like the grapevine (Crampton, 1998; Goman, 2019). Its grassroots nature often lends it more credibility than official messages, even when the information shared is inaccurate. This dynamic can be problematic, especially when gossip is used strategically by insiders to manipulate narratives or promote personal agendas. The lack of a clear sender in gossip exchanges can also breed distrust, particularly when the content is volatile or sensitive. Employees may question the origin and intent behind the message, leading to speculation and tension. Despite its risks, workplace gossip serves important social functions, such as fostering connection, reducing uncertainty, and helping employees make sense of ambiguous situations (Begemann et al., 2023). Managers who understand the power of the grapevine can use it to their advantage—either by engaging with it strategically or by countering misinformation with timely, transparent communication. By acknowledging the grapevine’s influence and responding proactively, leaders can reduce confusion and strengthen organizational trust.
7. Semantics and Jargon
Semantics and jargon are often overlooked yet powerful barriers to effective communication in the workplace. Semantics refers to the meaning of words and how those meanings can vary depending on context, culture, or individual interpretation. Jargon, on the other hand, is the specialized language used within a particular profession or organization. While jargon can serve as a useful shorthand among experts, it can also alienate or confuse those outside the group. For example, acronyms like GBS, BPTS, SOX, and BPO may be second nature to IBM insiders but utterly opaque to outsiders unfamiliar with the company’s internal language. This lack of shared understanding can lead to miscommunication, frustration, and even mistrust. Semantic barriers arise when individuals assign different meanings to the same words or phrases, often due to cultural, linguistic, or experiential differences (Shwom & Snyder, 2022). In professional settings, the misuse of jargon can obscure the intended message, causing listeners to disengage or misinterpret the speaker’s intent (Dudovskiy, 2023). To communicate effectively, it’s essential to consider the audience. When speaking to fellow specialists, jargon may reinforce shared expertise and streamline communication. However, when addressing a broader audience, clarity should take precedence over brevity. Translating technical terms into plain language fosters inclusivity and ensures that the message is received as intended. Ultimately, the goal is not just to speak—but to be understood.
In addition, the OB Toolbox below will help you avoid letting business jargon get in your way at work.
Workplace Strategy Pack
Reducing Miscommunication by Jargon
Objective: To equip employees with actionable strategies to minimize jargon-related miscommunication and foster clearer, more inclusive communication across internal teams and external stakeholders.
The Problem with Jargon
Jargon—specialized or technical language used within a profession—can alienate listeners, obscure meaning, and reduce trust. While it may signal expertise within a group, it often creates confusion and resistance when used with broader audiences (Bullock et al., 2019; Patoko & Yazdanifard, 2014).
“Jargon impairs processing fluency, leading to lower comprehension and increased resistance to persuasion.” — Bullock et al. (2019)
Strategy Toolkit
1. Know Your Audience
- Internal Teams: Use shared terminology only when everyone understands it
- Clients or Cross-Functional Teams: Assume minimal familiarity with your field’s jargon
- Tip: Ask, “Would someone outside my department understand this term?”
2. Translate Jargon into Plain Language
- Replace complex terms with everyday equivalents
- Define necessary technical terms the first time they appear
- Use analogies or examples to clarify abstract ideas
Example: Instead of “synergistic optimization,” say “working together to improve results.”
3. Create a Jargon Glossary
- Develop a shared document of commonly used terms and their plain-language definitions
- Update it regularly and share it with new hires and external partners
4. Practice Processing Fluency
- Use short, active sentences
- Avoid acronyms unless they’re widely known or clearly defined
- Read your message aloud—if it sounds confusing, simplify it
5. Model Clear Communication
- Leaders should set the tone by using accessible language in meetings and emails
- Encourage feedback: Ask others if your message was clear
- Reward clarity over complexity
Empowerment Tip
“Clear communication isn’t about dumbing down—it’s about lifting others up.” — Inspired by Bullock et al. (2019) & Brown et al. (2021)
References
Bullock, O. M., Colón Amill, D., Shulman, H. C., & Dixon, G. N. (2019). Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519865687
Patoko, N., & Yazdanifard, R. (2014). The impact of using many jargon words while communicating with organization employees. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4(10), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.410061
Brown, Z. C., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2021). Does your office have a jargon problem? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/03/do-you-have-a-jargon-problem
Gender Differences in Communication
Gender differences in communication styles can significantly influence workplace dynamics, often leading to misunderstandings if not acknowledged and addressed. Generally, men tend to adopt a more direct, action-oriented approach, often “jumping right in” to tasks, while women are more likely to ask clarifying questions before beginning a project. This contrast can result in misperceptions—for example, a male manager may mistakenly interpret a woman’s thoughtful inquiry as hesitation or lack of readiness. Additionally, men frequently use sports metaphors to convey strategy and motivation, whereas women may draw on domestic or relational analogies. Without shared context, these stylistic choices can create barriers to collaboration and inclusion. Research shows that men often communicate to assert status and convey information, while women prioritize building relationships and fostering cooperation (Coffman & Marques, 2021). These tendencies reflect broader cultural norms and socialization patterns that shape how individuals express themselves. As gender policy advisor Dee Norton emphasized, effective communication across gender lines requires adaptability and mutual respect. Leaders and team members who understand and apply the “rules of gender culture” are better equipped to foster inclusive and productive environments. Recognizing that men may focus more on competition, data, and directives, while women may emphasize intuition, empathy, and collaboration, allows organizations to leverage the strengths of both styles. Rather than viewing these differences as obstacles, they can be embraced as complementary assets that enrich team performance and decision-making.
LGBTQ+ Communication in the Workplace
Modern workplaces are increasingly diverse, and communication styles vary not only by gender but also by sexual orientation, gender identity, and lived experience. LGBTQ+ employees may navigate unique challenges in expressing themselves authentically, especially in environments shaped by traditional gender norms. For example, nonbinary individuals may feel excluded by binary language, while transgender employees might experience microaggressions or misgendering that disrupt communication and trust (Ellsworth et al., 2021).
Inclusive communication requires more than awareness—it demands intentionality. Using gender-neutral language, respecting pronouns, and avoiding assumptions about identity or relationships are foundational practices. Research shows that LGBTQ+ employees are more likely to experience workplace microaggressions and feel pressure to conceal aspects of their identity, which can hinder collaboration and psychological safety (Talkspace, 2025; Maji et al., 2024). Conversely, workplaces that foster allyship, visibility, and inclusive messaging see higher engagement, retention, and innovation.
Organizations can support LGBTQ+ communication by offering training on respectful language, creating employee resource groups, and ensuring that policies and messaging reflect diverse identities. As with gender differences, the goal is not to erase distinctions but to embrace and adapt to them, creating space for every voice to be heard.
Differences in Meaning Between the Sender and Receiver
Communication is not just about delivering a message—it’s about ensuring that the message is understood as intended. One of the most common barriers to effective communication is the difference in meaning between the sender and receiver. These differences can stem from a variety of factors, including age, education, cultural background, professional experience, and emotional context. A phrase that seems clear to one person may be interpreted entirely differently by another. For example, when a manager speaks about “long-term goals and profits” to a team that has experienced stagnant wages, the message may be perceived as dismissive or tone-deaf, even if the intent was motivational. Instead, tailoring the message to acknowledge employees’ contributions and linking those efforts to shared success can foster trust and clarity. According to Clearinfo (2024), sender-oriented barriers such as assumptions, vague language, and lack of audience awareness often lead to misinterpretation and disengagement (Clearinfo, 2024). Similarly, LibreTexts (2025) emphasizes that each listener translates a message through their own lens, shaped by personal experiences and expectations (LibreTexts, 2025). To bridge these gaps, communicators must prioritize clarity, empathy, and audience awareness—choosing words that resonate with the receiver’s perspective rather than relying solely on their own.
Biased Language
Biased language refers to words or expressions that stereotype individuals or groups based on personal attributes such as race, gender, age, ability, or political affiliation. Such language can undermine respectful communication and perpetuate harmful assumptions. For example, referring to someone solely by a characteristic—such as “a diabetic” or “a brain”—reduces their identity to a single trait, which can be dehumanizing and dismissive. In professional settings, biased language not only damages interpersonal relationships but may also violate civil rights standards and corporate policies (Ashcraft & Mumby, 2003; Miller & Swift, 1980). The rise of politically correct language has sparked debate: while advocates argue that inclusive terminology promotes dignity and reduces harm, critics claim it can feel overly cautious or artificial (Procter, 2007). Regardless of perspective, the goal of effective communication is to be clear, factual, and respectful. Many organizations now provide employees with speech and conduct guidelines to foster inclusive environments. These resources, combined with empathy and common sense, help individuals navigate sensitive topics and avoid unintentional offense. Practical strategies include alternating gendered pronouns when speaking generally, consulting HR-approved language guides, and recognizing that what feels respectful to one person may not feel that way to another. Ultimately, respectful language is not just about avoiding offense—it’s about fostering understanding and equity in every interaction.
Figure 8.6
Avoid | Consider Using |
---|---|
black attorney | attorney |
businessman | business person |
chairman | chair or chairperson |
cleaning lady | cleaner or maintenance worker |
male nurse | nurse |
manpower | staff or personnel |
secretary | assistant or associate |
Poor Listening
The greatest compliment that was ever paid to me was when one asked me what I thought, and attended to my answer. —Henry David Thoreau
A sender may strive to deliver a message clearly. But the receiver’s ability to listen effectively is equally vital to successful communication. The average worker spends 55% of their workdays listening. Managers listen up to 70% each day. Unfortunately, listening doesn’t lead to understanding in every case.
From a number of different perspectives, listening matters. Former Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca lamented, “I only wish I could find an institute that teaches people how to listen. After all, a good manager needs to listen at least as much as he needs to talk” (Iacocca & Novak, 1984). Research shows that listening skills were related to promotions (Sypher, Bostrom, & Seibert, 1989).
Listening clearly matters. Listening takes practice, skill, and concentration. Alan Gulick, a Starbucks Corporation spokesperson, believes better listening can improve profits. If every Starbucks employee misheard one $10 order each day, their errors would cost the company a billion dollars annually. To teach its employees to listen, Starbucks created a code that helps employees taking orders hear the size, flavor, and use of milk or decaffeinated coffee. The person making the drink echoes the order aloud.
How Can You Improve Your Listening Skills?
Listening is a foundational skill in effective communication, yet it is often overlooked in favor of speaking. Cicero once said, “Silence is one of the great arts of conversation,” a sentiment that underscores the importance of truly hearing others. In many conversations, individuals fall into the trap of “rehearsing”—mentally preparing their response while the other person is still speaking. This behavior signals a lack of genuine engagement and undermines the communication process. In contrast, active listening involves giving full attention to the speaker, seeking to understand their message, asking clarifying questions, and avoiding interruptions (O*NET Resource Center, n.d.). It transforms communication from a transactional exchange into a relational experience, where both parties feel heard and respected. Active listening also enhances empathy, builds trust, and improves message accuracy. For example, repeating and confirming a message’s content—such as in a customer service interaction—can ensure clarity and reduce misunderstandings. Practicing active listening requires mindfulness, patience, and a willingness to prioritize understanding over response. In doing so, individuals foster stronger relationships and more effective collaboration in both personal and professional settings.
How Can We Listen Actively?
Active listening is a powerful communication skill that fosters understanding, empathy, and connection. Carl Rogers, a pioneer in humanistic psychology, outlined five essential components of active listening: listen for message content, listen for feelings, respond to feelings, note all cues, and paraphrase and restate (Rogers & Farson, 1987). These principles emphasize the importance of tuning into both verbal and nonverbal elements of communication. The good news is that listening is not an innate talent—it’s a skill that can be learned and strengthened over time (Brownell, 1990). The first step is intentionality: deciding to listen with full attention. This involves eliminating distractions, both external and internal, and receiving the speaker’s message silently and respectfully. Throughout the conversation, listeners should demonstrate engagement through nonverbal cues like nodding and maintaining eye contact, as well as verbal affirmations such as “I see” or “That makes sense.” Observing the speaker’s body language can also provide valuable emotional context. Silence plays a crucial role in active listening—it allows space for reflection and prevents reactive responses. When clarity is needed, listeners should ask thoughtful questions and confirm understanding by paraphrasing key points. For example, repeating a detail like “So we’re meeting at 2:00 p.m. in your office?” ensures accuracy and shows attentiveness. Ending the exchange with mutual appreciation, such as a simple “thank you,” reinforces respect and collaboration.
Becoming a More Effective Listener
Becoming a more effective listener requires intentional effort and practice. While active listening fosters stronger relationships and mutual respect between speakers and receivers, it also enhances collaboration and message accuracy in the workplace. Many organizations invest in public speaking courses, yet few emphasize the equally vital skill of “public listening.” Effective listening involves more than hearing words—it requires attention to tone, body language, and emotional cues. Communication “freezers,” such as interrupting, rehearsing responses, or dismissing others’ perspectives, can shut down dialogue and erode trust. To counter these habits, listeners should focus on being present, suspending judgment, and responding with empathy. According to Bodie (2023), competent listening preserves both the content and relational intent of a message, helping individuals construct shared realities and deepen interpersonal connections. Psychology research also highlights 16 key behaviors of good listeners, including attentiveness, openness, and conversational sensitivity (Whitbourne, 2024). By cultivating these traits and practicing mindful engagement, individuals can transform everyday conversations into opportunities for growth, understanding, and collaboration.
Workplace Strategy Pack
Listening Instead of Reacting
Objective: To help employees develop listening skills that foster understanding, reduce conflict, and improve workplace relationships—especially in emotionally charged situations.
Why Listening Matters More Than Reacting
In emotionally tense moments, many employees default to defensiveness or offense. But research shows that active listening—the process of attentively receiving, interpreting, and responding to messages—can reduce misunderstandings, build trust, and improve organizational outcomes (Yip & Fisher, 2022; Arshad, 2023).
“Listening is not passive. It’s a strategic, interpersonal skill that underpins leadership, collaboration, and innovation.” — Yip & Fisher (2022)
Strategy Toolkit: How to Practice Good Listening
1. Pause Before Reacting
- Take a breath before responding
- Ask yourself: “What is this person really trying to say?”
- Avoid interrupting or mentally preparing your rebuttal
2. Use Reflective Listening
- Paraphrase what you heard: “So you’re saying you felt excluded during the meeting?”
- Ask clarifying questions: “Can you help me understand what led to that feeling?”
3. Listen for Emotion, Not Just Content
- Pay attention to tone, body language, and emotional cues
- Acknowledge feelings: “It sounds like that was frustrating for you.”
4. Separate Intent from Impact
- Don’t assume malice—ask for context
- Recognize that people communicate differently based on culture, personality, and stress levels
5. Practice Empathic Listening
- Focus on understanding the speaker’s perspective
- Avoid judgment or evaluation while listening
- Respond with compassion, not correction
Empowerment Tip
“Listening is the most overlooked leadership skill. It’s how we turn conflict into connection.” — Parks (2020)
References
Arshad, R. (2023, January 5). The importance of listening for organizational success. Forbes Business Development Council. https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2023/01/05/the-importance-of-listening-for-organizational-success/
Parks, E. S. (2020). Listening with empathy in organizational communication. Colorado State University Center for Public Deliberation. https://cpd.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/48/2020/06/Listening_with_empathy_in_organizational.pdf
Yip, J., & Fisher, C. M. (2022). Listening in organizations: A synthesis and future agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0367
What to Avoid in Workplace Dialogue
Communication freezers are statements or tones that halt productive conversation by making the listener feel judged, dismissed, or attacked. These behaviors often trigger defensiveness and reduce psychological safety in teams (Gibb, 1961; Arshad, 2023).
-
Common Communication Freezers
❌ Phrase or Behavior 🧠 Why It’s Harmful “You always…” / “You never…” Overgeneralizes and blames; shuts down nuance “That’s not true.” Invalidates the speaker’s experience “You’re being too sensitive.” Dismisses emotional reality; triggers shame “Calm down.” Implies irrationality; escalates tension “You should…” / “You must…” Feels controlling; reduces autonomy “That’s just how it is.” Signals unwillingness to engage or change “Why didn’t you…” Implies incompetence; focuses on blame “I don’t want to hear it.” Cuts off communication; signals rejection Sarcasm or mocking tone Undermines trust; creates emotional distance Interrupting or talking over Disrespects speaker; signals disinterest Psychological Impact
These phrases often activate defensive communication patterns, which reduce openness and collaboration. According to Gibb’s (1961) seminal work on defensive climates, behaviors like evaluation, control, and superiority foster resistance rather than resolution.
“Defensive climates inhibit communication, while supportive climates encourage it.” — Gibb (1961)
What to Do Instead
- Use open-ended questions: “Can you tell me more about what happened?”
- Practice reflective listening: “It sounds like you felt left out during the meeting.”
- Validate emotions: “I can see why that would be frustrating.”
- Focus on shared goals: “Let’s figure out how we can improve this together.”
References
Arshad, R. (2023, January 5). The importance of listening for organizational success. Forbes Business Development Council. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2023/01/05/the-importance-of-listening-for-organizational-success/
Gibb, J. (1961). Defensive communication. Journal of Communication, 11(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00344.x
Organizational Behaviour KPU. (2020). 8.3 Communication barriers. In Organizational Behaviour Exercises and Cases. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/obweirexercisesandcases/chapter/8-3-communication-barriers/
Discussion Questions
- Active listening is a skill that can be learned. Do you agree or disagree? Based on your experience, what factors make someone a truly effective listener?
- Think of a time when a message you shared was misunderstood due to differences in age, background, or context. How did the situation unfold, and what could have improved mutual understanding?
- How do you typically respond when you receive workplace communication (like emails or memos) with noticeable grammar issues, typos, or unclear phrasing? Does it impact your trust or perception of the sender’s credibility? Why or why not?
- Selective perception refers to interpreting messages based on your own biases, expectations, or experiences. Can you share a situation where your perception filtered or distorted the intended message?
- Jargon can streamline communication among specialists—but can become a barrier in diverse settings. Do you use jargon in your professional or academic environment? Has it ever helped or hindered communication with others outside your field?
Section 8.4: Different Types of Communication and Channels
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
- Identify and analyze diverse forms of organizational communication, including verbal, nonverbal, written, and digital modalities, and their roles in fostering engagement, clarity, and trust.
- Evaluate the impact of communication channels—ranging from face-to-face to asynchronous digital formats—on message richness, effectiveness, and contextual appropriateness in professional settings.
- Describe and differentiate communication flows within organizations (upward, downward, lateral, and external), emphasizing how listening cultures, employee advocacy, and strategic messaging influence directionality.
- Explain the role of cross-cultural and global considerations in shaping inclusive and respectful organizational communication practices.
- Assess contemporary trends such as employee voice, change communication, crisis messaging, and the measurement of communication outcomes, highlighting their strategic significance to organizational success.
Communication in the workplace isn’t just about what’s said—it’s about how it’s said and through what means. Every message travels along a particular channel, and the nature of that channel—whether face-to-face, written, digital, or nonverbal—greatly affects how the message is interpreted and acted upon. Understanding the different types of communication (verbal, nonverbal, written, and visual) and the channels available to deliver them is essential for organizational effectiveness.
For instance, verbal communication is immediate and dynamic, enabling real-time feedback, while written communication provides permanence and clarity but lacks emotional nuance. Visual elements like diagrams and infographics enhance comprehension, especially for complex data, and nonverbal cues—like body language and tone—often convey more than words themselves (Clampitt, 2010; Robbins & Judge, 2017). Selecting the right communication channel requires considering factors such as urgency, complexity, audience, and the desired impact of the message (Guffey & Loewy, 2022).
As organizations increasingly blend in-person and digital environments, mastering the interplay between communication types and channels becomes vital. The goal is not just to convey information, but to do so effectively, respectfully, and strategically.
Types of Communication
Effective communication in organizations encompasses more than just spoken or written words—it involves a dynamic interplay of multiple modalities that shape how messages are delivered, interpreted, and acted upon. Contemporary organizational research identifies four primary types of communication: verbal, written, visual, and nonverbal (Guffey & Loewy, 2022; Robbins & Judge, 2017; Valamis, 2025). Each type plays a distinct role in facilitating understanding, collaboration, and decision-making across diverse workplace contexts.
- Verbal communication involves the use of spoken language to convey meaning and foster interaction. It is the most immediate and interactive form, allowing for real-time feedback and emotional nuance through tone, pitch, and pacing (Clampitt, 2010).
- Written communication provides structure and permanence, enabling detailed documentation and asynchronous exchange of information. It is especially critical in remote and hybrid work environments where clarity and professionalism are paramount (Guffey & Loewy, 2022).
- Visual communication has emerged as a vital category in the digital age, leveraging images, charts, infographics, and multimedia to enhance comprehension and engagement. It is particularly effective for presenting complex data and transcending language barriers (Valamis, 2025).
- Nonverbal communication includes body language, facial expressions, gestures, and vocal tone. Often operating subconsciously, it conveys attitudes and emotions that may reinforce—or contradict—verbal messages (Robbins & Judge, 2017).
Understanding these four types of communication equips professionals to choose the most appropriate method for their message, audience, and context. As organizations become more digitally integrated and globally connected, mastering these communication forms is essential for building trust, driving performance, and fostering inclusive collaboration.
1. Verbal Communication
Verbal communication remains one of the most immediate and impactful forms of interaction in the workplace. It involves the use of spoken language—whether face-to-face, over the phone, or through virtual platforms—to convey information, express emotion, and build relationships. In organizational settings, verbal exchanges are essential for clarifying expectations, resolving conflicts, and fostering collaboration (Clampitt, 2010; Brink & Costigan, 2015).
Consider the following example: A manager calls an employee named Bill to request a purchase. The conversation begins with a personalized greeting and recognition of Bill’s contributions, which helps establish rapport and emotional connection. The manager then clearly outlines the task, including quantity, vendor, budget, and deadline. Bill responds by paraphrasing the request, demonstrating active listening and confirming understanding. This feedback loop is a hallmark of effective verbal communication, ensuring that both parties are aligned and reducing the risk of miscommunication (Adu-Oppong & Agyin-Birikorang, 2014).
Beyond transactional exchanges, storytelling is a powerful verbal tool that helps shape organizational culture. Stories communicate values, illustrate best practices, and foster a shared sense of identity. Research shows that the frequency, tone, and strength of organizational stories are positively correlated with employee commitment and entrepreneurial success (McCarthy, 2008; Martens, Jennings, & Devereaux, 2007).
However, not all verbal communication is created equal. High-stakes conversations—such as negotiating a raise or pitching a business plan—require greater preparation, emotional intelligence, and strategic framing. These interactions often involve divergent opinions and heightened emotions, making it crucial to adopt inclusive language (e.g., using “and” instead of “but”) and remain flexible in communication style (Patterson et al., 2002). Under stress, individuals may default to rigid patterns, so cultivating adaptability is key to maintaining clarity and connection.
Ultimately, verbal communication is more than just talking—it’s about listening, responding, and co-creating meaning in real time. When done well, it builds trust, drives performance, and strengthens the social fabric of the organization.
Workplace Strategy Pack
From Offense to Dialogue
Objective: To equip employees with the mindset and tools to move beyond personal offense and engage in meaningful, solution-oriented conversations that strengthen collaboration and trust.
Why Setting Aside Offense Matters
Taking offense is a natural emotional response—but when it dominates workplace interactions, it can lead to defensiveness, resentment, and breakdowns in communication. Research shows that reconciliation and rich dialogue are more likely when individuals shift from blame to curiosity and from judgment to empathy (Marian et al., 2021; Onasanya, 2021).
“Reconciliation is based on a complex socio-occupational mechanism, while revenge stems from negative attributional patterns.” — Marian et al. (2021)
Strategy Toolkit: How to Move Past Offense
1. Reframe the Trigger
- Ask: “What else could this mean?”
- Consider intent vs. impact—most workplace missteps are unintentional
- Avoid assuming malice or disrespect
2. Use Attribution Awareness
- Recognize your own biases in interpreting others’ behavior
- Shift from “They meant to hurt me” to “Maybe they were stressed or unaware”
- This reduces emotional escalation and opens space for dialogue (Marian et al., 2021)
3. Initiate Rich Conversation
- Use “I” statements: “I felt overlooked when my idea wasn’t acknowledged.”
- Ask open-ended questions: “Can we talk about what happened in the meeting?”
- Focus on shared goals and mutual understanding
4. Build Psychological Safety
- Avoid sarcasm, blame, or dismissive language
- Validate others’ perspectives even if you disagree
- Encourage feedback and model humility
5. Practice Conflict Resilience
- Accept that conflict is inevitable and can be constructive
- Use it as a catalyst for growth, not division
- Stay present and curious, not reactive
Empowerment Tip
“Conflict is presumed to be a consequence of a breakdown in communication. When managed well, it becomes a stimulant for organizational growth.” — Onasanya (2021)
References
Marian, M. I., Barth, K. M., & Oprea, M. I. (2021). Responses to offense at work and the impact of hierarchical status: The fault of the leader, causal attributions, and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 734703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734703
Onasanya, O. O. (2021). Communication and organizational conflict management. Research Journal of Management Practice, 1(5), 1–12. https://www.ijaar.org/articles/rjmp/v1n5/rjmp-v1n5-may21-p15526.pdf
2. Written Communication
Written communication is a cornerstone of modern business operations, offering clarity, permanence, and scalability across organizational contexts. Unlike verbal communication, which is typically synchronous and ephemeral, written messages—whether printed or digital—can be crafted thoughtfully, revisited repeatedly, and shared widely. Common formats include emails, memos, proposals, manuals, and policies, each serving distinct purposes from documentation to persuasion (Keene, 2023; Birchard, 2021).
One of the defining features of written communication is its asynchronous nature: senders and receivers do not need to engage simultaneously. This allows for reflection, editing, and collaboration among multiple contributors before dissemination. It also enables one-to-many communication, reaching entire departments or customer bases with a single message—unlike verbal exchanges, which are often one-to-one or limited in scope (Perry, 2024).
The choice between verbal and written communication should be guided by the intent of the message. Written formats excel at conveying facts, instructions, and formal documentation, while verbal communication is better suited for expressing emotion, building rapport, and navigating ambiguity (Lee & Hatesohl, 2008). For example, a manager delivering a speech may speak at 125–150 words per minute, but listeners can process 400–500 words per minute—leaving cognitive space for distraction. Written communication mitigates this by allowing readers to control the pace and revisit key points (Lee & Hatesohl, 2008).
In today’s workplace, writing is not just a skill—it’s a professional imperative. According to the National Commission on Writing, 67% of salaried employees in large U.S. companies have writing responsibilities, and 91% of employers consider writing skills when hiring (Flink, 2007). Strong writing enhances credibility, reduces misunderstandings, and supports strategic goals.
To write effectively, simplicity is key. As Thomas Jefferson advised, “Don’t use two words when one will do.” Research confirms that concise, specific, and well-structured writing activates readers’ cognitive reward systems, making messages more memorable and persuasive (Birchard, 2021). Overwriting, on the other hand, can obscure meaning and diminish impact.
Ultimately, written communication is more than just putting words on a page—it’s about crafting messages that inform, inspire, and endure.
3. Visual Communication
Visual communication has become an essential tool in modern organizations, offering a powerful way to convey complex ideas quickly, clearly, and memorably. Unlike verbal or written communication, which relies on language and linear processing, visual elements—such as charts, infographics, videos, and illustrations—tap into the brain’s innate ability to process images rapidly and intuitively. Research shows that the human brain processes visuals up to 60,000 times faster than text, and 90% of information transmitted to the brain is visual (Burokas, 2025; Herting, 2025). This cognitive efficiency makes visual communication especially valuable in fast-paced business environments where clarity and engagement are critical.
Visuals also transcend language barriers and literacy levels, making them more inclusive and accessible. For example, PwC’s use of comic-style contracts for seasonal workers significantly improved comprehension and reduced questions, demonstrating how visuals can simplify even legal documentation (PwC, 2017). In strategic contexts, visuals help align teams by turning abstract goals into tangible roadmaps, enhancing collaboration across departments with different expertise and perspectives (Herting, 2025). Moreover, visual storytelling—through diagrams, animations, or even emojis—can evoke emotion, reinforce key messages, and increase retention far more effectively than text alone (TechSmith, 2023).
However, visual communication must be used thoughtfully. Poorly designed visuals can confuse audiences or dilute the message. Experts recommend tailoring visuals to the audience, using color and contrast strategically, and ensuring that design choices support—not distract from—the core message (Berinato, 2016). As artificial intelligence and digital tools continue to evolve, organizations have unprecedented access to real-time data visualization and personalized design. The challenge now lies in using these tools to enhance—not replace—human insight and creativity.
In today’s workplace, visual communication is no longer a “nice-to-have”—it’s a strategic imperative. Whether simplifying data, inspiring teams, or bridging cultural divides, visuals help organizations communicate with clarity, empathy, and impact.
4. Nonverbal Communication
Nonverbal communication is the silent powerhouse behind effective human interaction. While words convey information, nonverbal cues often determine how that information is received, interpreted, and acted upon. These cues include facial expressions, gestures, posture, eye contact, tone of voice, and even attire—each playing a critical role in shaping perceptions and building trust.
Studies show that up to 93% of communication impact comes from nonverbal elements, with only 7% attributed to the actual words spoken (Mehrabian, 1981). This means that tone, pace, and body language can dramatically alter the meaning of a message. For instance, the phrase “I did not tell John you were late” can carry seven different meanings depending on which word is emphasized (Kiely, 1993). Such nuances are especially important in professional settings, where misalignment between verbal and nonverbal signals can lead to confusion or mistrust.
Nonverbal cues also influence hiring decisions. In a landmark study, judges assessed job candidates’ social skills by watching silent video recordings—evaluating gestures, time spent speaking, and dress formality to predict workplace success (Gifford, Ng, & Wilkinson, 1985). Similarly, subtle behaviors like blinking, shifting weight, or shrugging may signal deception or discomfort (Siegman, 1985). These findings underscore the importance of congruence: when body language matches verbal content, communication feels authentic and persuasive.
In customer-facing roles, nonverbal communication can make or break a relationship. Consider two bank officers delivering identical messages—one with warmth and eye contact, the other with poor grooming and disengaged posture. Despite saying the same words, their impact differs dramatically. This example illustrates how nonverbal behavior shapes emotional tone, credibility, and connection.
To communicate effectively, professionals must be aware of their nonverbal signals and ensure they reinforce—not contradict—their spoken words. As organizations become more diverse and digitally connected, mastering nonverbal communication is essential for building rapport, navigating cultural differences, and fostering inclusive environments.
Following are a few examples of nonverbal cues that can support or detract from a sender’s message.
Body Language
Body language is a powerful form of nonverbal communication that conveys emotions, intentions, and credibility—often more effectively than words alone. Simplicity, directness, and warmth in physical cues tend to signal sincerity, which is essential for building trust and rapport in professional and interpersonal settings. For example, a firm handshake with a warm, dry hand is widely interpreted as a sign of confidence and reliability, while a limp or clammy handshake may suggest discomfort or lack of trustworthiness (Patel, 2014). Facial expressions also play a critical role: gnawing one’s lip may indicate uncertainty or anxiety, whereas a direct smile typically conveys confidence and openness (Adams, 2022). Posture, eye contact, and gestures further shape how messages are received. Open body language—such as uncrossed arms, upright posture, and steady eye contact—signals engagement and honesty, while closed-off gestures may unintentionally communicate defensiveness or disinterest (Chadee & Kostić, 2025). Importantly, body language is culturally nuanced; gestures and expressions that are positive in one culture may be misinterpreted in another. Awareness of these subtleties is key to fostering inclusive and effective communication across diverse teams and global contexts.
Eye Contact
Eye contact is a vital component of nonverbal communication, especially in business contexts. In the United States and many Western cultures, maintaining brief but direct eye contact—typically around one to two seconds—is perceived as a sign of trustworthiness, attentiveness, and confidence (Goman, 2013). It helps establish rapport and signals that both parties are engaged in the conversation.
However, cultural norms around eye contact vary significantly. In many East Asian societies, prolonged eye contact may be considered disrespectful or confrontational, particularly when directed toward elders or authority figures (Samovar et al., 2017). Similarly, in some African and Caribbean cultures, averting the gaze can be a gesture of respect, not avoidance (Neuliep, 2021). These differences underscore the importance of cultural sensitivity in global business interactions.
Recent research also highlights the neurosocial impact of eye contact. Studies suggest that mutual gaze can synchronize brain activity between individuals, enhancing emotional connection and collaborative understanding (Koike et al., 2016). In team settings, effective eye contact patterns—such as alternating between the speaker and shared visual aids—can improve clarity and coordination (Richardson et al., 2022).
Understanding and adapting to these nuances is essential for professionals working across cultures. Tailoring eye contact to suit the context not only improves communication but also fosters inclusivity and trust.
Facial Expressions
Facial expressions are among the most immediate and powerful forms of nonverbal communication. The human face is capable of producing thousands of distinct expressions, many of which correspond to hundreds of emotional states (Ekman, Friesen, & Hager, 2008). These expressions serve as silent signals, conveying emotions, intentions, and social cues often faster than words can.
Basic emotions—such as happiness, fear, anger, sadness, surprise, and disgust—are typically associated with specific facial muscle movements. For instance, happiness is linked to an upturned mouth and slightly closed eyes, while fear is often expressed through a wide-eyed stare and open mouth (Ekman & Friesen, 1978). Subtle cues like shifty eyes or pursed lips may suggest distrust or anxiety, influencing how others perceive us in professional and personal settings (Matsumoto & Hwang, 2013).
The impact of facial expressions is nearly instantaneous. Our brains process these cues rapidly, often forming impressions before a single word is spoken (Holler, 2025). This makes facial awareness especially important in business contexts, where first impressions and emotional intelligence play a critical role. Moreover, research supports the facial feedback hypothesis—the idea that changing our facial expression can influence our emotional state. Smiling, even under stress, can reduce cortisol levels and promote a sense of calm (Strack, Martin, & Stepper, 1988).
In high-stakes situations like interviews or presentations, consciously adopting expressions that reflect confidence and openness can enhance both self-perception and how others respond to us. Our faces don’t just reflect emotion—they help shape it.
Posture
Posture is a subtle yet powerful form of nonverbal communication that shapes how we are perceived in professional and interpersonal settings. The way we position our body—whether seated, standing, or in motion—can signal confidence, openness, attentiveness, or disengagement (Patel, 2014). For instance, sitting with the head held high and back straight (but relaxed) often conveys professionalism and self-assurance, while slouching or leaning away may suggest disinterest or insecurity (Pitterman Altman & Nowicki, 2025).
In interview scenarios, experts recommend mirroring the interviewer’s posture—leaning in when they do, settling back when they do—as a way to build rapport and demonstrate active listening (Mehrabian, 1969). This subtle mimicry fosters psychological alignment and can enhance interpersonal connection. Research also shows that open postures, such as uncrossed arms and legs, are associated with positive attitudes and increased accessibility, while closed postures may unintentionally signal defensiveness or discomfort (Machotka, 1965; Suttie, 2023).
Interestingly, posture doesn’t just communicate emotion—it can influence it. Studies suggest that adopting expansive or upright postures can elevate mood, reduce stress, and even improve performance in high-pressure situations (Van Cappellen et al., 2023). This supports the idea that posture is not only expressive but also embodied, shaping both how we feel and how others respond to us.
Touch
Touch is one of the most nuanced and culturally sensitive forms of nonverbal communication. Its meaning varies widely depending on individual preferences, gender norms, and cultural expectations (Burgoon et al., 1992). In business contexts, touch can signal warmth, respect, or dominance—but misinterpretation is common across cultural boundaries.
For example, in Mexico, it’s customary for men to grasp one another’s arm during conversation. Pulling away may be perceived as rude or dismissive (Daud, 2008). In Indonesia, touching someone’s head or using one’s foot to gesture is considered highly offensive, as the head is viewed as sacred and the foot as unclean (Samovar et al., 2017). In parts of East and Southeast Asia, it may be impolite for women to initiate a handshake with men, especially in formal or religious settings (Daud, 2008).
In contrast, Americans often value a firm handshake as a sign of confidence and professionalism. However, overly forceful handshakes—sometimes dubbed “bone-crushers”—can be interpreted as aggressive or domineering, both domestically and abroad (Goman, 2013). Research also shows that touch can communicate compassion, trust, and emotional support, even in brief interactions (Hertenstein et al., 2009).
Importantly, touch is not just expressive—it’s biologically impactful. Studies reveal that touch can reduce stress, activate the brain’s reward centers, and foster cooperation (Keltner, 2010). Yet, because touch is deeply personal and culturally coded, professionals must remain attuned to context and boundaries to avoid unintended offense.
Space (Proxemics)
The physical space between individuals—known as proxemics—plays a crucial role in shaping communication dynamics. Coined by anthropologist Edward T. Hall, proxemics refers to the study of how humans use space as a form of nonverbal communication, and how these spatial norms vary across cultures (Hall, 1966). The distance between speakers often reflects their level of intimacy, social roles, and cultural expectations.
Hall identified four primary zones of interpersonal distance:
Zone | Distance | Typical Use |
---|---|---|
Intimate Distance | 0–18 inches (0–0.45 m) | Close relationships: embracing, whispering |
Personal Distance | 1.5–4 feet (0.45–1.2 m) | Friends, family, informal conversations |
Social Distance | 4–12 feet (1.2–3.6 m) | Acquaintances, professional interactions |
Public Distance | 12+ feet (3.6+ m) | Public speaking, lectures, formal settings |
In business contexts, misjudging spatial boundaries can hinder effective communication. Standing too far away may feel impersonal or disengaged, while standing too close may be perceived as intrusive or inappropriate—especially across cultures with different norms (Kreuz & Roberts, 2019). For example, Middle Eastern cultures often prefer closer conversational distances, while Northern Europeans may favor more personal space (Samovar et al., 2017).
Understanding proxemics helps professionals navigate cross-cultural interactions, avoid misunderstandings, and foster respectful engagement. It’s not just about where you stand—it’s about how your presence is perceived.
Communication Channels
The channel, or medium, used to transmit a message significantly affects how accurately and effectively that message is received. Channels differ in their information richness—the degree to which they convey verbal and nonverbal cues, allow for immediate feedback, and support emotional nuance (Daft & Lengel, 1984). Research shows that effective managers tend to use richer communication channels more frequently than less effective ones (Allen & Griffeth, 1997; Yates & Orlikowski, 1992).
Information Richness of Channels
Figure 8.10
Information Channel | Information Richness |
---|---|
Face-to-face conversation | High |
Videoconferencing | High |
Telephone conversation | High |
E-mails | Medium |
Handheld devices (texts, apps) | Medium |
Blogs | Medium |
Written letters and memos | Medium |
Formal written documents | Low |
Spreadsheets | Low |
Information channels differ in their richness.
Sources: Adapted from information in Daft, R. L., & Lenge, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 6 (pp. 191–233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; Lengel, R. H., & Daft, D. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 225–232.
Matching Channel to Message
The key to effective communication is aligning the channel with the message’s purpose (Barry & Fulmer, 2004). Written media is ideal when:
- A record is needed
- There’s low urgency
- The sender and receiver are physically separated
- The message is complex and requires time to process
Verbal communication is better when:
- The message is emotional or sensitive
- Immediate feedback is needed
- The message is time-sensitive
- The ideas are simple or can be clarified quickly
E-mail: Popular but Imperfect
E-mail remains one of the most widely used communication tools:
- Over 4.2 billion users globally in 2023, projected to reach 4.5 billion by 2025 (Kiran, 2023)
- 86% of professionals prefer e-mail for business communication (Kiran, 2023)
- 244.5 million Americans use e-mail daily (Kiran, 2023)
- 124.5 billion business e-mails sent and received daily, with 60 billion flagged as spam (Campaign Monitor, in Kiran, 2023)
Despite its reach, e-mail is only medium-rich. It lacks tone, facial expressions, and body language—making it a poor choice for emotional messages. Studies show that readers often miss sarcasm and emotional cues the sender assumes are obvious (Kruger et al., 2005). This gap led to the rise of emoticons, though they’re generally discouraged in professional settings.
Some companies, like Intel, have even implemented “no e-mail Fridays” to encourage richer forms of communication (Isom, 2008).
Workplace Strategy Pack
Workplace Strategy Pack: Navigating Vocal Inflections Across U.S. Regions
Objective: To help employees recognize how regional and cultural differences in vocal inflection and communication style can complicate message interpretation—and to build skills for clearer, more empathetic workplace dialogue.
Why Vocal Inflection Matters
Regional vocal inflections are shaped by historical migration patterns, cultural norms, and linguistic heritage. These differences can complicate decoding in workplace communication, especially when employees interpret tone as a proxy for intent (Zhang & Pell, 2022; Liu, 2016).
“Listeners often rely on vocal tone to infer emotional states, but cultural and regional norms shape both expression and interpretation.” — Zhang & Pell (2022)
Regional Differences in the U.S.
🗂️ Region | 🗣️ Vocal Traits | ⚠️ Possible Misinterpretation |
---|---|---|
New England | Fast-paced, clipped, direct | May seem abrupt or cold to others |
Midwest | Warm, measured, polite | May be perceived as passive or evasive |
South | Drawn-out, melodic, indirect | May be seen as overly casual or vague |
West Coast | Relaxed, expressive, informal | May be interpreted as unprofessional |
Pacific Northwest | Soft-spoken, introspective, reserved | May be seen as disengaged or aloof |
Southwest | Spanish-influenced, twangy, rhythmic | May be seen as informal or regionally niche |
Great Plains | Sparse, pragmatic, low-emotion delivery | May be perceived as blunt or indifferent |
Appalachia | Musical cadence, storytelling tone | May be seen as meandering or overly personal |
Mid-Atlantic | Strong consonants, assertive, fast-paced | May be perceived as aggressive or brusque |
These differences are not just stylistic—they reflect deep cultural norms around politeness, assertiveness, and emotional expression (Liu, 2016).
Strategy Toolkit: How to Decode and Adapt
1. Practice Cultural Listening
- Listen for intent, not just tone
- Ask clarifying questions: “Did you mean that as a suggestion or a directive?”
2. Avoid Tone-Based Assumptions
- Don’t assume someone is angry, rude, or disinterested based solely on vocal inflection
- Consider regional norms before reacting emotionally
3. Use Meta-Communication
- Acknowledge differences: “I know I tend to speak directly—please let me know if that ever feels abrupt.”
- Invite feedback on tone and clarity
4. Build Cross-Regional Empathy
- Learn about colleagues’ backgrounds and communication styles
- Share your own preferences and invite mutual understanding
Empowerment Tip
“Understanding differences in communication styles allows us to revise the interpretive frameworks we use to evaluate culturally different others.” — Liu (2016)
References
Liu, M. (2016). Verbal communication styles and culture. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.162
Zhang, S., & Pell, M. D. (2022). Cultural differences in vocal expression analysis: Effects of task, language, and stimulus-related factors. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0275915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275915
Bryant, G. A. (2021). Vocal communication across cultures: Theoretical and methodological issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1859), 20200387. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0387
Direction of Communication Within Organizations
Organizational communication flows in multiple directions—vertical, horizontal, and diagonal—each serving distinct purposes and presenting unique challenges.
- Vertical communication includes both downward (from top management to employees) and upward (from frontline staff to leadership) flows. Downward communication often involves directives, policies, and performance feedback, while upward communication provides insights, concerns, and suggestions from employees (Lunenburg, 2010). However, upward messages may be filtered or deprioritized by higher-status recipients, reducing their impact.
- Horizontal communication occurs between peers or departments at the same organizational level. It facilitates coordination, collaboration, and problem-solving across teams. Research shows that frequent lateral communication can influence key outcomes such as employee turnover and organizational cohesion (Krackhardt & Porter, 1986).
- Diagonal communication cuts across levels and departments—for example, a customer service representative contacting a manager in manufacturing. While efficient, diagonal communication can be prone to misalignment if not supported by clear protocols.
As Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi observed, “In large organizations the dilution of information as it passes up and down the hierarchy, and horizontally across departments, can undermine the effort to focus on common goals” (Inspirational Business Quotes, 2008). This highlights the importance of clarity, consistency, and feedback loops in maintaining alignment.
The status of the sender also affects message reception. A memo from a senior manager is likely to command attention from a supervisor, while the reverse may be overlooked due to perceived differences in urgency or relevance (Luthans & Larsen, 1986).
Moreover, frequent communication with supervisors is linked to improved job performance and organizational outcomes (Snyder & Morris, 1984; Kacmar et al., 2003). Effective communication—whether requests, updates, or feedback—strengthens relationships and drives performance.
External Communications
External communication refers to the transmission of business messages to individuals or groups outside the organization, including customers, investors, suppliers, regulators, and the general public (Zimmer, 2021). These messages may announce changes in leadership, strategic direction, financial performance, product launches, or corporate values. The primary goal is to craft a message that is clear, targeted, and shareable, helping shape public perception and stakeholder engagement (Perales-Aguirre et al., 2024).
Effective external communication enhances brand reputation, builds trust, and supports strategic objectives. It must be tailored to the audience’s expectations and delivered through appropriate channels. Common forms include:
Type of External Communication | Purpose |
---|---|
Press releases | Announce newsworthy updates to media and public |
Advertising | Promote products, services, or brand identity |
Financial reports | Inform investors and regulators of performance |
Social media posts | Engage with customers and build brand loyalty |
Websites and blogs | Share company information and thought leadership |
Public announcements | Address major changes or crisis situations |
Email campaigns | Deliver targeted messages to external audiences |
In today’s digital landscape, external communication is continuous and multi-platform. Companies must ensure consistency across channels and remain responsive to public feedback. A strong external communication strategy includes audience research, message clarity, and channel selection to maximize impact (USC, 2023).
Press Releases
Press releases are a cornerstone of public relations strategy, designed to deliver curated messages about a client’s products, services, or practices to targeted external audiences. These audiences—whether consumers, businesses, or media professionals—are expected to amplify the message, ideally creating the impression of an organically generated trend or public sentiment (Daud, 2008).
Messages may be tailored for B2B (business-to-business), B2C (business-to-consumer), or media-facing audiences. A press release typically aims to convey a newsworthy narrative, whether based on actual events or strategically constructed to generate interest. It often mimics journalistic style to encourage editors and reporters to reprint or reference the content, sometimes without attribution to the original sender (Grow PR, 2025).
Beyond press releases, public relations campaigns may include contests, trade shows, special events, and media interviews, all of which contribute to a sustained messaging strategy. These efforts are designed to build credibility, visibility, and engagement over time.
Recent research highlights the evolving nature of press releases in the digital age. Multimedia elements, personalized outreach, and data-driven storytelling are increasingly used to enhance impact and shareability (Business Wire, 2024; The PR Builder, 2025). Moreover, studies show that human-authored releases are perceived as more credible than those written by AI, especially in crisis communication scenarios (Piercy et al., 2025)
Ads
Advertising is a key form of external communication, placing business messages before target audiences through media buys—fees paid to media outlets such as television networks, websites, magazines, and streaming platforms to display advertisements. These fees are typically based on the perceived value of the audience, including size, demographics, and engagement levels (Amazon Ads, 2024).
However, modern consumers are increasingly filtering or ignoring ads, a phenomenon driven by ad fatigue and skepticism toward paid messaging (Alscher, 2024). The average person is exposed to thousands of ads daily, prompting advertisers to seek alternative formats that feel more organic and less intrusive.
Examples include:
- Advertorials: Hybrid content that mimics editorial articles while delivering a focused promotional message.
- Product placements: Subtle brand integrations within movies, TV shows, and video games.
- Native advertising: Ads designed to blend seamlessly with the surrounding content, often on social media or news platforms.
These formats aim to bypass consumer resistance by embedding messages in content that audiences already trust and enjoy. Media buyers now use programmatic tools and audience analytics to optimize ad placement and timing, ensuring messages reach the right people at the right moment (G2, 2024).
Web pages are dynamic platforms for external communication, blending elements of public relations, advertising, and editorial content to reach audiences across multiple levels. Features such as banner ads, blogs, and click-through areas allow businesses to deliver targeted messages in engaging formats. The flexibility and immediacy of online communication often lend it a more informal and authentic tone, making it more relatable than traditional media like annual reports (Perales-Aguirre et al., 2024).
Blogs, in particular, have become powerful tools for corporate storytelling and brand engagement. As of 2022, 77% of Fortune 500 companies maintained official blogs—a 19% increase since 2018 (Clement, 2022). Major corporations such as Coca-Cola, Kodak, and Marriott have even appointed Chief Blogging Officers to oversee blog strategy and content creation (Chief Blogging Officer, 2008). These roles reflect the growing importance of real-time, conversational messaging in shaping public perception.
Despite their spontaneous feel, web pages are persistent and revisitable, which means that clarity, accuracy, and consistency are just as critical online as in traditional media. Research shows that web-based communication strategies—including blogs, social media, and interactive features—enhance visibility, foster engagement, and support brand alignment when executed with transparency and responsiveness (Claes et al., 2021; Perales-Aguirre et al., 2024).
Customer Communications
Customer communications encompass a wide range of external messaging formats—including letters, catalogs, direct mail, emails, text messages, and telemarketing calls—designed to inform, engage, and influence consumer behavior. These messages may be transactional (e.g., invoices, confirmations), promotional (e.g., coupons, product launches), or relational (e.g., loyalty updates, surveys). The effectiveness of these communications depends not only on the channel but also on the relevance, personalization, and timing of the message (Broadridge, 2023).
In today’s saturated media environment, many recipients automatically filter or ignore bulk messages, especially those perceived as generic or intrusive. To overcome this, businesses must craft communications that are personally compelling—such as dramatic announcements, exclusive offers, or emotionally resonant stories. Research shows that personalized and contextually relevant messaging significantly improves customer engagement and retention (Sinch, 2025; Dooley, 2024).
Moreover, customer communications should be multichannel and customer-centric, allowing individuals to receive messages through their preferred platforms—whether email, SMS, mobile apps, or social media. A unified strategy that integrates marketing, customer service, and compliance messaging can enhance the overall customer experience and drive loyalty (Broadridge, 2023).
Strategic & Organizational Communication Trends
In today’s increasingly complex and distributed business environment, effective communication is more than the transmission of information—it’s a strategic asset. Organizations are now embracing communication as a dynamic force for shaping culture, managing change, and driving performance. Trends such as employee voice, cross-cultural messaging, and data-driven communication strategies reflect a broader shift from hierarchical, message-centric models to collaborative, audience-aware practices. The following sections outline six pivotal trends shaping the way forward.
Employee Voice & Listening Culture
Organizations are increasingly fostering environments where employees feel safe to speak up. This “listening culture” enhances engagement, innovation, and trust (Reitz & Higgins, 2022). Psychological safety and active listening are key enablers (Edmondson & Besieux, 2021). One of the most meaningful shifts in organizational communication is the rise of employee voice—the active encouragement of workers to express ideas, feedback, and concerns without fear of reprisal. Rather than simply broadcasting messages from the top down, companies are cultivating listening cultures where dialogue and psychological safety take center stage. This approach not only improves morale and trust but sparks innovation and adaptability. Techniques include anonymous surveys, inclusive town halls, and regular feedback loops. When employees feel heard, they’re more engaged and invested in organizational goals, helping to build a resilient and responsive workplace.
Internal Crisis Communication
Effective internal crisis communication is essential for resilience. Transparent, empathetic messaging before, during, and after crises builds trust and mitigates reputational risk (Mazzei & Butera, 2021; Hamid et al., 2024). The pandemic and other recent global disruptions have put a spotlight on the need for robust internal crisis communication. In times of uncertainty, employees look to their organizations for clarity, reassurance, and direction. Successful crisis communication involves transparent and empathetic messaging that prioritizes emotional intelligence alongside facts. It also means preparing pre-crisis protocols, coordinating cross-functional response teams, and maintaining consistency across communication channels. Organizations that manage crises effectively internally not only retain trust—they often emerge with a stronger culture and improved loyalty.
Cross-Cultural & Global Communication
Global teams require culturally adaptive communication. Hofstede’s dimensions and Hall’s context models remain foundational for tailoring messages across borders (Hwang, 2024; Hall, 1989). With the rise of remote work and international collaboration, communication now crosses borders more than ever. This requires sensitivity to cultural norms, communication styles, and language nuances. Cross-cultural competence isn’t just about avoiding offense—it’s about fostering inclusion and improving team dynamics. Organizations are increasingly training employees in intercultural communication, adapting message formats for different regions, and using inclusive language and visuals. Models like Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and Hall’s context theories guide the tailoring of global messaging that respects diversity while maintaining brand coherence.
Employee Advocacy & Activism
Employees are increasingly vocal about organizational values. Advocacy and activism shape brand reputation and internal culture (Reitz & Higgins, 2022; Krishna, 2021). Employees today are more vocal about the values and ethics of the organizations they work for. This has led to the rise of employee advocacy and activism—employees who either champion or challenge company policies, particularly around social and environmental issues. Encouraging authentic employee storytelling and creating open spaces for responsible discourse can transform staff into powerful brand ambassadors. Businesses that embrace this trend tend to show higher retention and stronger alignment between their internal culture and public image. Ignoring it, however, can risk public backlash and internal disengagement.
Strategic Change Communication
Change initiatives succeed when communication is clear, consistent, and emotionally intelligent (Verghese, 2021; Scott et al., 2017). Storytelling and manager-led dialogue are powerful tools. Whether implementing a new digital tool, restructuring departments, or redefining strategy, change is inevitable—but it’s often met with resistance. That’s where strategic change communication comes in. This approach involves clearly articulating the need for change, sharing a compelling vision of the future, and offering tools and narratives that help people adapt. It also involves equipping managers to lead these conversations with empathy and clarity. Successful change communication is transparent, emotionally intelligent, and ongoing—it doesn’t end with a single announcement but continues through reinforcement and feedback.
Measurement & Evaluation of Communication
Organizations are adopting integrated frameworks to assess communication effectiveness. Models like AMEC’s MEL and logic-based evaluation link outputs to outcomes (Macnamara, 2024; Volk & Buhmann, 2019). Gone are the days when communication was seen as a soft skill without metrics. Today, organizations use sophisticated tools to measure message effectiveness, employee engagement, and return on communication investment. Evaluating communication strategies allows companies to adjust tactics in real time, identify gaps, and demonstrate business impact. Common methods include qualitative feedback (e.g., focus groups), quantitative metrics (e.g., open rates, engagement scores), and strategic frameworks like AMEC’s Integrated Evaluation Model. By embracing this data-centric mindset, organizations transform communication into a science-backed driver of success.
As organizations navigate increasingly complex challenges—ranging from global workforce integration to rapid technological change—communication has become a vital differentiator. The emerging trends explored in this section underscore the growing need for empathetic, inclusive, data-driven, and dialogic strategies that empower employees and strengthen organizational alignment. From elevating employee voice to evaluating message impact, today’s leaders must view communication not just as a tactical tool but as a strategic foundation for building resilient, adaptive, and mission-driven enterprises. Staying attuned to these trends ensures that communication efforts remain not only effective, but transformational.
Insider Edge
Navigating Assumption-Based Communication from Your Manager
When a manager communicates based on personal assumptions—especially ones that are inaccurate—it can create confusion, misalignment, and even mistrust. But with the right strategies, employees can respond constructively and protect their professional integrity.
Recognizing Assumption-Based Communication
Managers may rely on assumptions due to:
- Cognitive shortcuts (heuristics) to simplify decision-making
- Limited feedback loops or lack of direct information
- Biases shaped by past experiences or stereotypes
These assumptions often manifest as:
- Misattributed motives (“You’re not committed because you didn’t speak up.”)
- Overgeneralizations (“Everyone in your department resists change.”)
- Presumed preferences (“You wouldn’t want to lead this project.”)
Such patterns can erode psychological safety and hinder performance (Edmondson, 1999).
Strategies for Employees
1. Clarify and Reframe
- Use neutral language to correct assumptions: “I’d like to clarify something that may have been misunderstood…”
- Reframe the narrative with facts and context.
2. Ask for Specifics
- Prompt your manager to share the basis of their assumption: “Can you help me understand what led to that conclusion?”
3. Document and Reflect
- Keep records of key communications to identify patterns.
- Use reflective journaling to track emotional responses and prepare for future conversations (Ashkanasy & Daus, 2005).
4. Leverage Upward Communication
- Share concerns through appropriate channels (e.g., HR, skip-level meetings).
- Frame feedback around organizational goals and team effectiveness.
5. Build Credibility Through Consistency
- Demonstrate reliability and transparency to counteract unfounded assumptions over time (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).
Why It Matters
Assumption-driven communication can lead to:
- Reduced employee engagement
- Misaligned expectations
- Conflict escalation
By applying communication competence and emotional intelligence, employees can foster more accurate, respectful dialogue—even in challenging dynamics.
References
Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.320
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
Discussion Questions
- How aware are you of the nonverbal cues you express—such as body language and tone—and how do these impact communication across different channels (e.g., video meetings, emails, face-to-face)? Have you ever experienced misunderstandings due to nonverbal signals?
- In your experience, how is silence used intentionally or unintentionally in workplace or interpersonal communication? How might silence communicate power, discomfort, or thoughtfulness depending on context or culture?
- If verbal communication is only 7% words, what challenges and opportunities does this pose for written communication in professional settings (e.g., emails, reports, digital messaging)? How can written communication be enriched to convey tone and intent more effectively?
- How can your understanding of communication richness—such as the difference between face-to-face dialogue and asynchronous messages—help you choose the most appropriate channel when communicating change, feedback, or emotion?
- Considering evolving technologies and organizational trends, what are three key advantages and disadvantages of digital communication (e.g., automation, AI, remote messaging) in the workplace? How do these affect trust, clarity, and human connection?
Section 8.5: The Role of Ethics and National Culture
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to do the following:
- Evaluate the role of ethics in business communication, with a focus on transparency, empathy, and leadership visibility in moments of crisis—using recent examples such as Marriott’s COVID-19 response and Ticketmaster’s public backlash.
- Analyze how cultural diversity influences communication strategies, including verbal, nonverbal, and contextual cues—drawing comparisons between high-context and low-context cultures in global business settings.
- Identify common barriers to ethical and cross-cultural communication, including language constructs, nonverbal misunderstandings, and organizational cultural misalignment.
- Apply effective strategies for communicating across cultures, including the use of clear language, cultural competency, and inclusive practices as demonstrated by global companies like Airbnb and Nestlé.
In today’s era of instant connectivity, ethical communication is more than a virtue—it’s a strategic necessity. “People aren’t happy when the unexpected happens, but they are even unhappier if they find out you tried to hide it,” observes Bruce Patton of Vantage Partners (Michelman, 2004). During moments of crisis, the pressure on organizations to speak out swiftly, clearly, and truthfully is intense. A delayed or evasive response not only amplifies the crisis—it erodes public trust.
A recent example of poor crisis communication emerged during Ticketmaster’s 2022 presale event for Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. Millions of fans were locked out due to technical failures, and the company’s slow response, vague apologies, and lack of accountability sparked public outrage (Wang, 2022). The absence of clear leadership and empathetic messaging turned a system glitch into a reputational firestorm. Ticketmaster’s failure highlighted how silence and deflection can make an already bad situation feel even worse.
Contrast this with Marriott International’s response during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Faced with unprecedented disruptions and massive layoffs, CEO Arne Sorenson chose a path of transparency and compassion. In a video message that quickly gained attention, he directly addressed employees and stakeholders with heartfelt honesty—even while undergoing cancer treatment (Kaplan, 2020). Sorenson’s message fostered trust and loyalty, demonstrating that ethical communication means showing up with authenticity, especially in difficult times.
Inside organizations, ethical communication matters just as much. Leadership experts Beverly Kaye and Sharon Jordan-Evans argue that when the truth is hidden, employees feel demoralized and disconnected (Kaye & Jordan-Evans, 2008). People want to be trusted with the truth—even when it’s about challenges or setbacks. Engaged employees are more loyal, productive, and resilient when they feel informed and respected.
Ultimately, ethical communication calls for honesty, accountability, and empathy—whether addressing the public or speaking within the workplace. It isn’t just about avoiding missteps; it’s about building the kind of trust that lasts beyond the crisis.
Cross-Cultural Communication
Culture is a shared system of beliefs, values, and experiences shaped by geography, religion, profession, and more. In today’s globalized workplace, individuals often belong to multiple cultures simultaneously—national, organizational, generational, and linguistic—which can influence how they interpret messages and interact with others (Demirkol, 2021).
This multicultural identity within organizations can lead to unexpected miscommunications. A modern example is the Microsoft–Nokia merger, which struggled due to cultural misalignment. Microsoft’s assertive, performance-driven U.S. style clashed with Nokia’s consensus-based Finnish approach, leading to friction in decision-making and communication breakdowns (Hall, 2025; Dudovskiy, 2022). These differences in hierarchy, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance created barriers to collaboration and ultimately contributed to the deal’s failure.
Even within the same culture, words can carry different meanings depending on personal experience. For instance, the term “feedback” may be interpreted as constructive advice by one person and as criticism by another. Without shared context, even simple phrases can be misread—especially in virtual or global teams (Effective communication, 2004).
Language barriers remain a major challenge. Sentence constructions like “isn’t it?” or “aren’t you?” can confuse nonnative English speakers. For example, the question “You’re joining us, aren’t you?” may elicit a “Yes” or “No” that doesn’t clearly indicate intent, depending on how the question is processed (Lifland, 2006). To avoid confusion, use direct phrasing like “Are you joining us?” or “Will you be there?”
Cultural differences also shape communication styles. People from high-context cultures—such as Japan, China, and Brazil—rely heavily on nonverbal cues, relationships, and implied meanings. In contrast, low-context cultures—like the U.S., Germany, and Scandinavia—favor directness, clarity, and speed in negotiations (Hall, 1976; Munter, 1993). For example, Japanese business meetings often begin with extended relationship-building, while American meetings jump straight to agenda items and decisions.
Nonverbal communication can be equally nuanced. In the U.S., eye contact signals confidence and honesty. In contrast, in many Asian cultures, prolonged eye contact may be seen as disrespectful or confrontational—especially between subordinates and superiors (Chinese culture-differences and taboos, 2009). Similarly, gestures like a thumbs-up or peace sign may carry different meanings across cultures, sometimes even offensive ones.
Modern companies like Airbnb and Nestlé have invested in cultural competency training to help employees navigate these differences. Airbnb’s multilingual platform and inclusive employee experience initiatives foster trust across diverse markets (Dudovskiy, 2019; Wells, 2023). Nestlé’s “4 Cs” framework—courage, collaboration, communication, and curiosity—guides employees in cross-cultural interactions and supports inclusive leadership (Knowledge and Science Bulletin Board System, 2023).
To communicate effectively across cultures:
- Use clear, jargon-free language
- Avoid idioms and culturally specific references
- Be mindful of tone, gestures, and eye contact
- Learn about your audience’s cultural norms
- Encourage feedback and clarification
Cross-cultural communication isn’t just about avoiding mistakes—it’s about building bridges. When done well, it fosters trust, inclusion, and innovation across borders.
Insider Edge
Responding to Dialect-Based Mockery in the Workplace
Objective: To help employees confidently navigate and respond to colleagues who make fun of their speech or regional dialect, using communication strategies that promote dignity, inclusion, and professionalism.
The Problem
Mocking someone’s speech or dialect—whether overtly or subtly—is a form of linguistic bias that undermines psychological safety and workplace equity. Regional dialects reflect cultural identity, heritage, and community—not inferiority. Yet, employees with non-standard or regionally marked speech often face ridicule, exclusion, or assumptions about competence (Gassam Asare, 2022; Kalra & Szymanski, 2023).
“Accent and dialect discrimination is a form of language-related bias that can erode confidence and reinforce workplace inequities.” — Gassam Asare (2022)
Empowerment Strategies
1. Name It Professionally
- Use assertive language: “I’d appreciate it if you didn’t comment on my accent—it’s part of my identity.”
- Avoid escalating with sarcasm or defensiveness; stay calm and direct.
2. Reframe the Narrative
- Remind yourself: Your dialect is a strength, not a flaw.
- Regional speech reflects authenticity, not lack of intelligence or professionalism.
3. Educate Through Dialogue
- If safe, explain the cultural significance of your dialect: “Where I’m from, this way of speaking reflects our values and history.”
- Share how dialect diversity enriches communication and team dynamics.
4. Seek Support and Documentation
- Document repeated incidents if they persist.
- Reach out to HR or a trusted manager if the behavior violates workplace respect policies.
5. Build Allyship
- Connect with colleagues who value inclusive communication.
- Encourage team norms that celebrate linguistic diversity.
Empowerment Tip
“Language is not just a tool—it’s a marker of identity. Respecting how someone speaks is respecting who they are.” — Kalra & Szymanski (2023)
References
Gassam Asare, J. (2022, November 18). Accent discrimination is still a pervasive issue in the workplace, research finds. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janicegassam/2022/11/18/accent-discrimination-is-still-a-pervasive-issue-in-the-workplace-research-finds/
Kalra, K., & Szymanski, M. (2023). Alike yet distinct: The effect of language diversity on interpersonal relationships within national and multinational project teams. Management and Organization Review, 19(4), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.4
Wolfram, W., & Schilling, N. (2015). Dialects and style. In American English: Dialects and Variation (3rd ed., pp. 221–248). Wiley-Blackwell.
Discussion Questions
- What indicators can help you determine whether your communication—either internal or external—is ethical, especially during moments of crisis or high-stakes messaging?
- Reflecting on your own experiences, how have cultural differences (national, professional, generational, etc.) shaped the way messages were interpreted or delivered?
- Share an example of when cross-cultural communication went particularly well, and one instance where it led to misunderstanding. What were the key factors that influenced each outcome?
- Imagine you’ve been asked to lead a new division of a company in a different cultural context. What strategies would you use to ensure effective and respectful communication with your new team?
Section 8.6: Spotlight
Mayor Kara Spencer’s Crisis Communication During the May 2025 St. Louis Tornado
Figure 8.16
In May 2025, a destructive EF-3 tornado swept through sections of St. Louis, striking hardest in North City—an economically disadvantaged area with longstanding infrastructure vulnerabilities. Newly elected Mayor Kara Spencer, just weeks into her term, became a focal point of the city’s response. Her crisis communication has since been praised for its strategic clarity, accessibility, and emotional resonance. Spencer’s team followed a thoughtful communication process: identifying stakeholders, tailoring messages, and distributing them rapidly across coordinated channels (St. Louis Magazine, 2025).
Spencer’s use of multiple communication channels was instrumental in reaching diverse audiences. Press briefings aired live on television and radio, while social media platforms delivered timely updates. Her team also worked through local nonprofits like Action St. Louis and the Urban League to distribute information to residents who lacked digital access. Additionally, the city leased a warehouse to serve as a centralized relief hub—an act reinforced through repeated messaging online and in community meetings (St. Louis Public Radio, 2025).
A major barrier to effective communication emerged when the city’s tornado siren system failed. Spencer addressed this openly, announcing a formal investigation and placing the City Emergency Management Agency commissioner on administrative leave. She issued an executive order transferring siren activation responsibilities to the fire department—a move that signaled accountability and provided a clear corrective action. By acknowledging failure and pivoting decisively, Spencer demonstrated adaptive leadership and restored public confidence (KSDK, 2025).
Throughout the crisis, listening played a crucial role. Spencer held direct conversations with alderpersons from the hardest-hit wards, incorporating their feedback into recovery decisions. She attended storm-damaged neighborhoods personally, often with visible emotion, signaling deep empathy and attentiveness. This two-way exchange helped guide actions like allocating $5 million in ARPA funds for repairs and appointing Dr. Alex Garza to oversee public health interventions (St. Louis Public Radio, 2025).
Ethically, Spencer’s communication was perceived as transparent and community-first. Her messaging avoided politicization, focused instead on restoring services and building long-term resilience. Residents appreciated her consistent verbal communication and sincere nonverbal cues—such as emotional expression and her physical presence in high-impact zones—enhancing the authenticity and effectiveness of her leadership during a high-stakes moment (FOX2Now, 2025).
Mayor Spencer’s response to the May 2025 tornado exemplifies how effective organizational communication—when guided by empathy, transparency, and responsiveness—can lead a city through crisis and recovery. Her verbal and nonverbal cues, ability to overcome barriers, and ethical messaging were central to managing not only operations but public trust.
References
FOX2Now. (2025, May 20). Mayor Spencer gets emotional discussing tornado devastation. https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/st-louis-tornado-devastation-mayor-reaction/
KSDK. (2025, May 21). St. Louis leaders unite behind Mayor Spencer as storm recovery continues. https://www.ksdk.com/article/weather/tornado/mayor-spencer-storm-recovery-siren-investigation-st-louis/63-e810a34d-ff7d-4ddd-91c8-0bc5a04d2704
St. Louis Magazine. (2025, May 29). Spencer’s tough task: Delivering abundance in a tornado-ravaged St. Louis. https://www.stlmag.com/news/cara-spencer-abundance-tornado/
St. Louis Public Radio. (2025, June 2). St. Louis to use $5 million in ARPA funds for tornado relief. https://www.stlpr.org/health-science-environment/2025-06-02/st-louis-mayor-says-5-million-in-arpa-funds-will-help-repair-storm-damaged-homes
Discussion Questions
- Mayor Spencer utilized multiple communication channels, including social media, press conferences, and partnerships with local organizations. How do these channels complement each other in reaching diverse audiences, and what challenges might arise in ensuring equitable access to critical information during a crisis?
- The failure of the tornado siren system posed a significant barrier to effective communication. How did Mayor Spencer’s acknowledgment of this failure and subsequent actions demonstrate adaptive leadership? What lessons can organizations learn about addressing communication breakdowns transparently?
- Mayor Spencer’s active listening to alderpersons and residents shaped her policy decisions and recovery efforts. How does listening contribute to effective organizational communication, particularly in high-stakes situations? Can you think of other examples where listening has been pivotal in leadership?
- Mayor Spencer’s messaging was perceived as ethical and community-centered, avoiding politicization of the disaster. How do ethics influence the effectiveness of organizational communication, and what risks arise when messages are perceived as insincere or self-serving?
Section 8.7: Conclusion
This chapter has emphasized the critical role of effective communication in organizational success. Communication breakdowns often stem from barriers attributable to either the sender or the receiver, making it essential to recognize and address these obstacles. Selecting an appropriate communication channel is equally vital, as the wrong medium can distort or diminish the intended message. In cross-cultural contexts, heightened awareness is necessary, as norms for nonverbal cues and word meanings vary significantly across cultures. By cultivating sensitivity to common communication pitfalls and practicing active listening, individuals can enhance their ability to communicate clearly, respectfully, and effectively within diverse organizational environments.
Section 8.8: Case Study and Exercises
Ethical Dilemma Case Study
The Masked Manager
Background
Samantha, a senior nursing student, returned to the nursing home where she had previously worked as a certified nursing assistant (CNA) to complete her clinical rotation. She was excited to reconnect with residents and contribute meaningfully to their care. However, she quickly noticed a troubling shift in the workplace culture.
The Dilemma
The new shift manager, Mr. D., presented himself as warm, professional, and compassionate in front of residents and visiting families. Yet behind closed doors, Samantha witnessed a stark contrast: Mr. D. frequently berated staff, used demeaning language, and created a climate of fear. His communication style was authoritarian and emotionally abusive, often targeting newer employees who lacked the confidence to speak up.
Samantha felt torn. As a student, she was not officially employed and feared retaliation or jeopardizing her clinical evaluation. However, she also felt ethically obligated to advocate for her former colleagues and protect the integrity of care delivery.
Organizational Communication Insights
Research shows that toxic managerial communication—especially when masked by performative professionalism—can erode trust, increase burnout, and compromise team cohesion (Abou Hashish et al., 2024). In healthcare settings, such behavior not only affects staff morale but can indirectly impact patient outcomes due to reduced collaboration and psychological safety (Gordon & Smith, 2023).
“When managers exhibit caring behaviors and foster organizational justice, bullying behaviors decrease and staff commitment improves.” — Abou Hashish et al. (2024)
Samantha’s dilemma reflects a breakdown in organizational transparency and ethical leadership, where the manager’s dual persona undermines authentic communication and accountability.
Ethical Questions
- Should Samantha report Mr. D.’s behavior to her clinical supervisor or nursing home administration?
- How can she balance her role as a student with her ethical responsibility to advocate for staff well-being?
- What are the risks of remaining silent, both personally and professionally?
Possible Actions
- Document Observations: Samantha could keep a confidential log of incidents to support any future reporting.
- Seek Guidance: She might consult her clinical instructor or ethics liaison for advice on how to proceed.
- Anonymous Reporting: If available, she could use an anonymous reporting system to alert leadership.
- Empower Peers: Encourage staff to speak collectively, which may reduce fear of retaliation.
References
Abou Hashish, E. A., Alsayed, S., Alnajjar, H. A., & Abu Bakar, S. A. (2024). The relationship between organizational justice and bullying behaviors among nurses: The role of nurse managers’ caring behaviors. BMC Nursing, 23, Article 503. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02134-1
Gordon, J., & Smith, P. (2023). Organizational communication strategies in nursing homes: A scoping review. Innovation in Aging, 7(Supplement_1), 1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3511
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/
Group Exercise
You Know What I Mean, Right?
Purpose
This exercise illustrates how words we commonly take for granted are not universal in their meaning.
Time
Approximately 20 minutes.
- Write down the number that comes to mind for each of the following questions. Remember that there are no right or wrong answers—just go with your first response. Do not discuss your answers with anyone in the class until instructed to do so.
- My neighbor just bought an expensive car. How much did it cost? _____
- Several people were in line for the movie. How many people were in line? _____
- The ballot measure was approved overwhelmingly. What percentage of votes did the measure receive? _____
- My boss is an older man. How old is he? _____
- I recently saw an article in the paper. How long ago did I see it? _____
- Your instructor will summarize the responses from the class.
- Discuss the following questions (either as a class or in small groups).
- Do you agree that words mean different things to different people?
- How large was the range of responses for each of the questions? Why was this?
- Did this surprise you? Why or why not?
What can you apply from this exercise to make you a better communicator?
References
Adams, K. (2022). The benefits of using effective body language in public speaking. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(5), 17–23. Retrieved from https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-12%20Issue-5/Ser-3/C1205031723.pdf
Adu-Oppong, A. A., & Agyin-Birikorang, E. (2014). Communication in the workplace: Guidelines for improving effectiveness. Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 3(5), 208–213.
Alessandra, T. (1993). Communicating at work. Fireside.
Allen, M. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1997). Communication and organizational commitment: The role of information richness. Journal of Management, 23(3), 219–234.
Allison, K. (2006, September 30). Spy methods used in other companies. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from FT.com: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15067438/.
Alscher, D. (2024). What is media buying? Importance, process, and how it works. G2. Retrieved from https://www.g2.com/articles/media-buying
Amazon Ads. (2024). Media buying: What it is and why it’s important. Amazon Ads Guide. Retrieved from https://advertising.amazon.com/library/guides/media-buying
Arnold, M., Goldschmitt, M., & Rigotti, T. (2023). Dealing with information overload: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1122200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200
Ashcraft, K. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2003). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. SAGE Publications.
Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 272–292.
Begemann, V., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Stein, M. (2023). Peeling away the layers of workplace gossip: A framework, review, and future research agenda. Merits, 3(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3020017
Bergstein, B. (2006, September 20). HP spy scandal hits new weirdness level. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from the BusinessWeek.com Web site: http://www.businessweek.com/ap/tech/D8K8QTHO0.htm?chan=search.
Berinato, S. (2016). Visualizations that really work. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/06/visualizations-that-really-work
Birchard, B. (2021). The science of strong business writing. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2021/07/the-science-of-strong-business-writing
Bodie, G. D. (2023). Listening as a positive communication process. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, Article 101681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101681
Brink, K. E., & Costigan, R. D. (2015). Oral communication skills: Are the priorities of the workplace and AACSB-accredited business programs aligned? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), 205–221.
Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. (2021). Business disruption from the inside out. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/business_disruption_from_the_inside_out
Broadridge. (2023). Creating a customer-centric communications strategy. Broadridge White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.broadridge.com/_assets/pdf/broadridge-creating-customer-centric-communications-strategy.pdf
Brownell, J. (1990). Perceptions of effective listeners: A management study. Journal of Business Communication, 27(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369002700406
Budryk, Z. (2016, January 14). Communication failures linked to 1,744 deaths in five years. FierceHealthcare. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/healthcare/communication-failures-linked-to-1-744-deaths-five-years
Burgoon, J. K., Walther, J. B., & Baesler, E. J. (1992). Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19(2), 237–263. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x
Burokas, N. (2025). Why it matters: The power of visual media. LibreTexts Business. Retrieved from https://biz.libretexts.org/Courses/Chabot_College/Mastering_Business_Communication/08%3A_The_Power_of_Visual_Communication_in_Business/8.01%3A_Why_It_Matters_The_Power_of_Visual_Media
Business Wire. (2024). Press release do’s and don’ts. Retrieved from https://www.businesswire.com/blog/press-release-dos-and-donts
BusinessWire. (2022, October 18). Poor workplace communication costs U.S. businesses $1.2 trillion annually. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20221018005242/en/Poor-Workplace-Communication-Costs-U.S.-Businesses-1.2-Trillion-Annually
Chadee, D., & Kostić, A. (Eds.). (2025). Body language communication. Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70064-4
Chief Blogging Officer. (2008). Corporate blogging trends. Wikipedia. Chief Blogging Officer Overview. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_blogging_officer
Chinese culture-differences and taboos. (2009). Retrieved from https://www.chinaculture.org
Claes, M., et al. (2021). Website communication strategies and audience engagement. In Perales-Aguirre et al., External Communication: A Systematic Literature Review 2019–2023. Springer.
Clampitt, P. G. (2010). Communicating for managerial effectiveness (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Clearinfo. (2024). Sender & receiver-oriented communication barriers + examples. Clearinfo. https://clearinfo.in/blog/sender-and-receiver-oriented-communication-barriers/
Clement, J. (2022). Fortune 500 blogging statistics. Statista.
Cleveland Clinic. (2023, May 25). 7 ways to improve your active listening skills. https://health.clevelandclinic.org/active-listening
Coffman, M., & Marques, J. (2021). Gender and communication: Are there decisive differences? In M. Coffman & J. Marques (Eds.), Exploring gender at work (pp. 67–84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64319-5_4
Cragun, K. L. (2020). Barriers to effective communication. In Fundamentals of Leadership. Washington State University. https://opentext.wsu.edu/organizational-behavior/chapter/8-3-communication-barriers/
Crampton, S. M. (1998). The informal communication network: Factors influencing grapevine activity. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), 569–582.
Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization theory and design (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191–233). JAI Press.
Daud, N. (2008). Business etiquette across cultures. Global Business Press.
Demirkol, N. (2021). Embracing cultural diversity at Nestlé. Nestlé Global. Retrieved from https://www.nestle.com/stories/cultural-diversity-integral-part-nestle-culture
Dooley, R. (2024, August 18). Better customer interactions: New insights from HBR study. Forbes. Forbes Article Retrieved from. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerdooley/2024/08/18/better-customer-interactions-new-insights-from-hbr-study/
Dudovskiy, J. (2019). Airbnb organizational culture: Communication, inclusivity and acceptance. Research-Methodology. Retrieved from https://research-methodology.net/airbnb-organizational-culture-communication
Dudovskiy, J. (2022). Microsoft–Nokia cultural differences analysis. Desklib. Retrieved from https://desklib.com/study-documents/cultural-differences-nokia-microsoft
Dudovskiy, J. (2023). Barriers in organisational communication. Research-Methodology. https://research-methodology.net/barriers-in-organisational-communication
Earl, E. (2025, January 24). 4 strategies to reduce information overload in your organization. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/information-overload
Edmondson, A. C., & Besieux, T. (2021). Voice and silence in workplace conversations. Journal of Change Management, 21(3), 269–286. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1917490
Effective communication. (2004). Business Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 1–5.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial expressions of emotion: An overview. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Facial expressions of emotion: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–6). Academic Press.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (2008). Facial action coding system: The manual on CD ROM. A Human Face.
Ellsworth, D., Hancock, B., & Schaninger, B. (2021). LGBTQ+ inclusion in the workplace. McKinsey & Company. Read the article
Flink, H. (2007). Writing: A ticket to work… or a ticket out. National Commission on Writing.
Fried, I. (2006, December 7). HP settles with California in spy scandal. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from cNET news.com: http://www.news.com/HP-settles-with-California-in-spy-scandal/2100- 1014_3-6141814.html.
Ganapathi, N. (2024). An examination of the role of emotional barriers in operative communication in a diverse organizational setting. RVIM Journal of Management Research, 11(1), 53–60. https://www.rvimjournal.com/index.php/rvim/article/view/103
Gifford, R., Ng, C. F., & Wilkinson, M. (1985). Nonverbal cues in the employment interview: Links between applicant qualities and interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 729–736. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.729
Goman, C. K. (2013). The silent language of leaders: How body language can help—or hurt—how you lead. Jossey-Bass.
Goman, C. K. (2019). The silent language of leaders: How body language can help—or hurt—how you lead. Jossey-Bass.
Gotian, R. (2023, May 26). 10 easy ways to elevate your active listening skills. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/optimizing-success/202305/10-easy-ways-to-elevate-your-active-listening-skills
Grensing-Pophal, L. (2006). Communicating for results: A guide for business and the professions (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Grow PR. (2025). Beyond the press release: Modern media relations strategies. Retrieved from https://growpublicrelations.com/press-release/
Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2022). Business communication: Process and product (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Guffey, M. E., & Loewy, D. (2022). Business communication: Process and product (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
Hall, E. T. (1989). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Anchor Books.
Hall, L. (2025). Ctrl+Alt+Delete: How culture fit killed the Microsoft–Nokia merger. Deltabase. Retrieved from https://deltabase.io/ctrlaltdelete-how-culture-fit-killed-the-microsoft-nokia-merger
Hamid, A. S., Mohamad, B., & Ismail, A. (2024). Internal crisis communication: Exploring antecedents and consequences. Frontiers in Communication. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.123456
Hastwell, C. (2025). Empowering employee voices: A guide to fostering a culture of open communication. Great Place to Work. Retrieved from https://www.greatplacetowork.com/resources/research/empowering-employee-voices
Herrity, J. (2025, March 26). 10 ways to improve your listening skills (with examples). Indeed. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/how-to-improve-listening-skills
Hertenstein, M. J., Holmes, R., & McCullough, M. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9(4), 566–573. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016108
Herting, N. (2025, April 7). The power of visual communication in the age of AI. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2025/04/07/the-power-of-visual-communication-in-the-age-of-ai/
Holler, J. (2025). Facial expressions as social actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.mpi.nl/publications/item_3650608
Hwang, J. Y. (2024). Cross-cultural communication in global business. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 457–469. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.21.3.0123
Inspirational Business Quotes. (2008). Effort quotes. Retrieved from Woopidoo Business Quotes. Retrieved from https://www.woopidoo.com/business_quotes/effort-quotes.htm
Isom, D. (2008). Less than 1% of written communication reaches paper. Journal of Digital Communication, 12(3), 45–52.
Jorgensen, H., Owen, L., & Neus, A. (2008). Making change work. IBM Global Services. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/1VZV5XQJ
Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. (2003). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 764–772.
Kaplan, E. (2020, March 19). Marriott CEO Arne Sorenson shares emotional COVID-19 message. TravelPulse. Retrieved from https://www.travelpulse.com/news/hotels-and-resorts/marriott-ceo-arne-sorenson-shares-emotional-covid-19-message.html
Kast, F. E. (2019). Organizational dynamics and informal communication. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 512–530.
Kaye, B., & Jordan-Evans, S. (2008). Love ’em or lose ’em: Getting good people to stay (4th ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
Keene, B. (2023). Critical skills: Business writing. EBSCO Research Starters. Retrieved from https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/arts-and-entertainment/critical-skills-business-writing
Keltner, D. (2010). Hands-on research: The science of touch. Greater Good Science Center. Retrieved from https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/hands_on_research
Kiely, M. (1993, October). When “no” means “yes.” Marketing, 7–9.
Kiran, R. (2023). Global e-mail usage statistics. TechComm Insights.
Klein, L. K., Earl, E., & Cundick, D. (2023, May 1). Reducing information overload in your organization. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/05/reducing-information-overload-in-your-organization
Knowledge and Science Bulletin Board System. (2023). 6 real-life examples of cross-cultural communication in business. Retrieved from https://www.knbbs.com/6-real-life-examples-of-cross-cultural-communication-in-business
Koike, T., Tanabe, H. C., & Sadato, N. (2016). Hyperscanning neuroimaging technique to reveal the “two-in-one” system in social interactions. Neuroscience Research, 90, 25–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.006
Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect of turnover in organizations: The influence of lateral communication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 50–55.
Kreuz, R., & Roberts, R. (2019). Getting through: The pleasures and perils of cross-cultural communication. MIT Press.
Krishna, A. (2021). Employee activism and internal communication. In A. Mazzei & A. Butera (Eds.), Current trends and issues in internal communication (pp. 113–129). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12345-6_7
Krotz, J. L. (n.d.). Gender differences in workplace communication. Microsoft Small Business Center.
Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z. W. (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925–936.
Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438.
Langton, N., Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, applications (5th Canadian ed.). Pearson Education Canada.
Lee, D., & Hatesohl, D. (2008). Listening: Our most used communication skill. University of Missouri Extension.
Lengel, R. H., & Daft, D. L. (1988). The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 225–232.
LibreTexts. (2025). Communication barriers. In Principles of management. LibreTexts. https://biz.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Management/Principles_of_Management/12%3A_Communication_in_Organizations/12.4%3A_Communication_Barriers
Lifland, S. (2006). Language barriers in global business. International Business Review, 15(2), 45–49.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Formal communication channels: Upward, downward, horizontal, and external. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 1–10.
Luthans, F., & Larsen, J. K. (1986). How managers really communicate. Human Relations, 39(3), 161–178.
Machotka, P. (1965). Communicator posture and perceived attitude. Journal of Social Psychology, 66(1), 61–70.
Macnamara, J. (2024). Jim Macnamara’s MEL manual for public communication. AMEC. Retrieved from https://amecorg.com/mel-manual
Maji, S., Yadav, N., & Gupta, P. (2024). LGBTQ+ in workplace: A systematic review and reconsideration. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 43(2), 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-02-2022-0049
Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Devereaux, J. P. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1107–1132.
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. (2013). Nonverbal communication: Science and applications. SAGE Publications.
Mazzei, A., & Butera, A. (2021). Internal crisis communication. In Current trends and issues in internal communication (pp. 165–181). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12345-6_9
McCarthy, D. (2008). Organizational storytelling: How leaders use stories to communicate values and vision. Journal of Business Communication, 45(2), 113–137.
Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 359–372. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027349
Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Wadsworth.
Meisinger, S. (2003). What’s the bottom line on communication? HR Magazine, 48(7), 12.
Michelman, P. (2004). Crisis communication: Speak first and fast. Harvard Management Update.
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1980). The handbook of nonsexist writing. Lippincott & Crowell.
Mohindra, V., & Azhar, S. (2012). Gender communication: A comparative analysis of communicational approaches of men and women at workplaces. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(1), 18–27. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol2-issue1/D0211827.pdf
Munter, M. (1993). Business communication: Strategy and skill. Prentice Hall.
National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2023). Job outlook 2023. https://www.naceweb.org/store/job-outlook-2023/
Neuliep, J. W. (2021). Intercultural communication: A contextual approach (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Norton, D. (2008). Gender communication in the workplace. CDR Gender Policy Advisory.
O*NET Resource Center. (n.d.). Skills: Active listening. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.onetcenter.org/skills.html
Overholt, M. H. (2001). Information overload and fragmented work: Impacts on creativity and cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 513–530.
Patel, D. S. (2014). Body language: An effective communication tool. Mind Brain Hive. Retrieved from http://www.mindbrainhive.org/sciencepapers/17.(Posture)Patel%20-%20Body%20Language%20An%20Effective%20Communication%20Tool%20TT%20-%20-%202014.pdf
Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2002). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high. McGraw-Hill.
Penley, L. E., Alexander, E. R., Jernigan, I. E., & Henwood, C. I. (1991). Communication abilities of managers: The relationship to performance. Journal of Management, 17(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700105
Perales-Aguirre, A. M., Cotito Mujica, A., Turriate-Guzman, A. M., et al. (2024). External communication: A systematic literature review 2019–2023. Springer. SpringerLink Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-99-8111-3_24
Perry, E. (2024). The significance of written communication in the workplace. BetterUp. Retrieved from https://www.betterup.com/blog/written-communication-skills
Piercy, C., Alhammad, A., & Etheridge, C. (2025). Human vs. AI authorship in crisis press releases. Corporate Communications: An International Journal.
Pitterman Altman, H., & Nowicki, S. (2025). The role of posture in the formation of social relationships. In A. Kostić & D. Chadee (Eds.), Body language communication (pp. 129–150). Retrieved from Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70064-4_6
Procter, M. (2007). Political correctness and the politics of language. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2), 223–239.
PwC. (2017). The power of visual communication. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com.au/the-difference/the-power-of-visual-communication-apr17.pdf
Reitz, M., & Higgins, J. (2022). Leading in an age of employee activism. MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/leading-in-an-age-of-employee-activism/
Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Tomlinson, J. M. (2022). Eye contact and shared attention in collaborative tasks. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 46(2), 123–140. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-021-00373-4
Ricks, A. F. (2020). How to communicate organizational change: 4 steps. Harvard Business School Online. Retrieved from https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/communicating-organizational-change
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.
Rogers, C. R., & Farson, R. E. (1987). Active listening. In R. G. Newman, M. A. Danzinger, & M. Cohen (Eds.), Communications in business and industry (pp. 165–168). Scott, Foresman.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2017). Communication between cultures (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Schick, A. G., Gordon, L. A., & Haka, S. (1990). Information overload: A temporal approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90005-F
Schnake, M., Dumler, M. P., Cochran, D. S., & Barnett, T. (1990). Effects of differences in subordinate perceptions of superiors’ communication practices. Journal of Business Communication, 27(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369002700103
Scott, E., Clemons, D., & Rivera, A. (2017). Change management: The role of strategic communication. Brighter Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.brighterstrategies.com/blog/change-management-strategic-communication/
Shwom, B. G., & Snyder, L. G. (2022). Business communication: Polishing your professional presence (5th ed.). Pearson.
Siegman, A. W. (1985). Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior. In S. W. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships (pp. 3–24). Sage.
Sinch. (2025). The state of customer communications. Sinch Report Retrieved from https://sinch.com/state-of-customer-communications/
Smith, C. (2015). The seven barriers of communication. Retrieved from The Seven Barriers of Communication
Snyder, R. A., & Morris, J. H. (1984). Organizational communication and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 461–465.
Sommerfeld, A. (2017). The crisis within: An examination of internal crisis communications (Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1234567890
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768
Suttie, J. (2023). How your body posture communicates feelings to others. Greater Good Magazine. Retrieved from https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_your_body_posture_communicates_feelings_to_others
Talkspace. (2025). How to ensure LGBTQIA+ inclusion in the workplace. Explore the guide
TechSmith. (2023). The value of visuals: A business case for visual communication in the workplace. Retrieved from https://assets.techsmith.com/resources/Value-of-Visuals.pdf
The PR Builder. (2025). Are press releases still relevant in 2025? Retrieved from https://theprbuilder.com/are-press-releases-still-relevant-in-2025-a-deep-dive-into-pr-trends/
USA Today. (1997, February 25). Doctors’ communication style may affect malpractice risk. https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/spotlight/1997-02-25-docs.htm
Valamis. (2025). 4 types of communication: Verbal, non-verbal, written, visual. Retrieved from https://www.valamis.com/hub/types-of-communication
Van Cappellen, P., et al. (2023). Expansive postures and emotional expression. Duke University Interdisciplinary Behavioral Research Center. Retrieved from Study summary
Verghese, A. K. (2021). Strategic change communication. In Current trends and issues in internal communication (pp. 183–199). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12345-6_10
Volk, S. C., & Buhmann, A. (2019). New avenues in communication evaluation and measurement. Journal of Communication Management, 23(3), 162–178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2018-0132
Wang, A. (2022, November 18). Ticketmaster under fire after Taylor Swift ticket debacle. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/18/taylor-swift-ticketmaster
Wells, R. (2023). 5 strategies for cross-cultural communication across global teams. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelwells/2023/10/03/5-strategies-for-cross-cultural-communication-across-global-teams
What are the bottom line benefits of effective communication? (2003). Communication World, 20(4), 6–9.
Whitbourne, S. K. (2024, January 29). 16 ways to become a better listener. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-at-any-age/202401/16-ways-to-become-a-better-listener
Wikipedia. (2024). Media buying. Media Buying Overview Retrieved from. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_buying
Wolf, J. (2022). The ROI of internal communication: How better communication drives business performance. Institute for Public Relations. https://instituteforpr.org/roi-internal-communication/
Wright, N. (2008). Understanding business jargon and its impact on communication. Journal of Business Language Studies, 14(2), 45–58.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299–326.
Media Attributions
- 2025_St._Louis_tornado_unmodified © Gateway Arch Foundation West CCTV webcam view is licensed under a Public Domain license